mantlepiecek said:
I was thinking of following you but you stumped yourself.
And I didn't discredit Linkz's assessment. Linkz said things that pointed at him being NOT the cop. Did you not see it?
I will remember what you said, but I will point out that I did indeed try and help linkz out. I did say he was looking like town all the time to help him in his argument.
Although remember that investigative roles can also mean scum role cops and scum flavour cops. I can't go around being 100% sure of linkz just because I got an investigative inspection.
I didn't undermine his assessment of Nen as much as you think. If I was any more obvious I might as well have role-claimed.
So tell me prof, why is it that after linkz flipped cop, you yourself didn't know exactly whom he targeted? Nen/stefl? It's because it wasn't that clear and I am not sure why you think it was so clear linkz being sure of Nen. The only difference between me and you is that you knew he was investigative a bit later, on day 3. Whereas I knew it on day 2.
|
Answering questions first.
"...at him being NOT the cop. Did you not see it?" So despite your own evidence, Linkz understandably trying to go undetected and speak subtly led you to believe he was not the cop...
"So prof tell me why...." Because he was ambiguous on who he cleared. Why is it that you had a problem with nen, but not with stefl?
Tell me this. In your opinion how would mafia have acted had they had your role and night results?