Not bad, but we're many years from that.

This is why I'm hoping that if there is ever another Mass Effect game, it ditches the Unreal Engine and uses the CryEngine.

shiny, now where is that next gen hardware i'm getting anxious for?

*Joke about PC gaming*

OT: that looks nice, but a DICE employee using CE3 to make Halo stuff is hilarious.

No cause then he will be bound to Low Quality Hardware

HE is doing that stuff with the CryEngine 3 and those screens look like it is made for PC Hardware and Settings.
He just loves to see what probably one of his favorite franchises could look like if it would be made for actual good hardware with a good engine.
And he probably wants to show what people could expect from Next Gen even though then he will already make much more beautiful stuff cause PCs are again much more superior at that time.

Why CryEngine 3 and not the FB2?
PRobably cause he thinks it suits more the Halo Universe.
And maybe he wants to see what the CE3 is capable of compared to their own engine.Those 2 are competing for best engine.Unreal Engine 4 isn't coming even close with its oil tears.

If using Cryengine 3 and making Halo 4 look like this means that there would be no CPU/memory left for computer AI, we're much better off with current Halo engine...

I mean Crysis 2 campaign was complete garbage mostly due to the non existent AI, which wasn't any better on the PC.

To the guys who really wonder: You can download the CE3 sdk for non-commercial use like the Unreal sdk, there is no Frostbite 2 sdk.