M.U.G.E.N said:
crissindahouse said:
M.U.G.E.N said:
crissindahouse said:
M.U.G.E.N said:
@Criss: yep and I guessed exactly what your post will be like as well :P Typical
|
that's possible, now what i the bigger joke? i still believe wondering about that is better than being one of the "fighters" (but yeah, always wondering about it is stupid as well)
but when i read just as example that:
M.U.G.E.N said:
lol so many MS balls
and no they are still building while now sony already have a solid infrastructure and it's mainly aimed at gaming. MS have yet to show anything of the like. This is PR nonsense as usual.
And to the guy who said about cloud saves, sony have it too you know. iirc they brought it first to ps3, before ms did for xbox |
i wonder why you have to even say that? andrespetmonkey asked a question and that guy answered it, why do you think "omg now i have to say sony has it as well for a long time because...no clue..."
as if he was saying something against sony, he just asnwered a question.
|
you drunk or something? Your first part of the reply is a bunch of jibberish
as for part two
facepalm. At least try to comprehend what you read. My response was to show that even THAT use of cloud has been done before by Sony, hence the whole catch up scenario does not apply to them.
I did not attack the guy, I just pointed something out. Me and thranx, and me and sales, none of us are fighting here. It has been a perfectly reasonable discussion from different points of view. If you are so narrow minded and have nothing contribute, please just buzz off. And if you do have something to say to someone, stop being a chicken and say so upfront without snarky ambiguous comments.
I do not care what your opinion about me, or anyone else is. Just stop jumping to conclusions based on your preconcieved notions. It makes for a rather stupid set of comments. The only reason I even bothered to reply to you is because this is not the first time you did this.
|
yes because i always wonder about fanboys, that's why i post it sometimes. btw you didn't quote my full text (i edited it at the same time)
and i didn't say you attacked the guy...but he just answered a question to someone who asked if microsoft has cloud service for xbox yet and that sony has cloud service for playstation. he said to andres that microsoft has cloud service and then you have to say him "sony has it as well you know" when andrespetmonkey already said that and he only answered andres's question? you see? it makes no sense what you did!
and with fighting, i don't really mean fighting^^ just "oh something "against"" sony, i have to clear that up.
i'm not "narrow minded", but you are talking about pr nonsense and things like that which has simply nothing to do with the topic, so learn to understand what you read or you should stop posting. you just talk about something in op which isn't in op...so yeah, maybe you didn't really read op but next time you contribute to a topic learn first to understand the topic before you say somebody else that he is narrow minded. but if it makes you happy to call people like that gratz for that.
|
you are definitely narrow minded and already have showed that clearly. I have read the OP. The one here acting clueless is you. My and thranx discussion has nothing to do with the ramblings you are making. Not sure why you are so butt hurt about that. You invested in MS or something? I really don't understand your issue here. SO far the discussion/argument has been about cloud, playinc catch up and the focus of each company. You are the one who came in whining about oh noez someone said something, I kidna knew, not gonna tell who cuz I'm just like that bla bla bla. If you have an issue with someones post man up and just say so up front. No need to hide behind a rant
'MY' comment has nothing to do with andre, my comment was aimed at the guy who said that to tell him that he is right but even that can not be used to defend this PR. If that part was not clear to you for some reason you could have just asked without jumping to conclusions. But like I said you are narrow minded and already made up your mind when you saw my comment due to your previous ill concieved notions. Can't help that, especially if you can't even accept you are in the wrong. Whatever makes you feel good I suppose'
Like I said if whining and bitching is all you could do, could you at least stay away from other people's discussions? neither me, nor thranx and ironically even Sales is 'defending' a company here. We have been perfectly on topic until you came in with your vague and stupid comment. You have managed to derail a thread with your ignorance. Congrats
|
no i'm not narrow minded. i'm pretty sure i'm very much the opposite of that but still thx! and no, i have no investments in microsoft and i don't care if this news is about microsoft or general motors and when did i say something about your dicussion with tranx? i don't even know why you always have to talk about that discussion when i never said something about that.
and i believe you still don't get it, andres said playstation+ uses cloud and asked if microsoft uses it yet and the guy responded to him and said "mcirosoft uses it for some time now". why exactly do you have to say him sony uses it too if he already knows it? he didn't say anything else and even if he wouldn't have known it, he read it in andres his post where he alrady said it. and you still don't stop talking about that "pr" in op but it isn't pr. do you understand what i try to say you all the time? you say it is pr when an analyst and the guy from mastertronic/ukie talk about microsoft...it's like i would have said yesterday that pachter is a pr guy for sony because he was talking about sony yesterday.
i like how you try to tell me that i don't want to accept that i am wrong when you clearly still don't get what i even talk about and that you still talk about pr in op which isn't pr.
so please, if i am wrong all the time and i can't accept that i am wrong, please explain me why i am wrong. if i am wrong you have to be right. so please explain me why it is pr? if you really understood op you should easily explain me why i am wrong saying it isn't pr and why you are right.
