supermario128 said:
Didn't you already answer your own question? Linkz: "I'm not voting yet, but if I were to I'd vote for spurge, radish, or the super serial Mario.(And so that there's no misreading that, I mean his serious attitude)" Obviously, if I didn't say I was going to play more serious ahead of time people would think I am changing my play style for a different reason. I'm pretty sure I already mentioned I would play more serious before the game even started, but if I didn't say so directly then I meant to and it should be obvious as to why. Anyways, this is a bit funny. I get lynched for being too care free and obnoxious and now you are saying you would vote for me because I am being too serious. |
I see two things wrong with your behavior. Announcing a change in-game more often comes from scum than town. You may have mentioned something in the post-game after last round, and if so I will retract that point.
The second thing is now you're pre-defending a proposed positive change in behavior. Someone calls you out for not being as jokey, and the natural thought should be that you got lynched for it. As someone trying to improve their play, doing something that is less likely to get you lynched is a good thing. That alone would be a horrible metric to judge your alignment.