By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics - What happens if ObamaCare is overturned?

HesAPooka said:

...and yet their health care system is great. I'd know, I lived there, and there's plenty of data to back it up.

The ISSUE is your health care system in the states is terrible and needs to be fixed by either changing to a system like Canada, Norway, or Denmark who have a great system in place. Or Look to other countires that have a health care system in place like the one you Americans love (I.E switzerland) and learn from it. Michael Moore is not the issue and I dont understand why you're talking about him. I simply used the youtube clip as an example of a publicly funded system that works great and is superior to the American system. 

There's a funny thing about statistics... often times people use imperefect data without filtering out extranious variables.

 

Including the above of course... since they use a quicker regression method that equalizes "Fatal injury rate" rather then spend a decade looking at  exactly how the age of the people who died. (Hence why some countries life expectancy actually drops in the second chart, they have exceedingly low accidental fatale injury rates/murder/accident rates.)

Point is though... the numbers used are full of flaws.



Around the Network

Oh and as for Norway and it's prisons... it's a totally different culture.

Which more or less changes everything,

Take all the people from Norway and replace them with everybody from Alabama... keep the same laws, and I guarantee you the crime rate would increase and shit over there wouldn't work nearly as well. (Alabama being used because it's roughly the same population.)

The United States is a much more individualistic culture, which has it's own strengths and weaknesses. There is a reason why Scandinavian Style reforms mostly failed in the 90's and early 00's when tried by other European governments.

They had an interesting conversation about that the other day on NPR (well 2 months ago) about why Norway welfare work in Norway but don't work in France. The conclusion? Norwegians buy into the social contract more.



spaceguy said:
Jexy said:
What Kasz216 said.

Also, el oh el to the guy who trusts the government to regulate things over the private sector.



Yea because a company that has waste won't dump it into your drinking water if they don't regulate him to not do so. So yes the government is there to stop those things. There is a lot of good regulation and bad regulation. This is not a all or nothing, there is a grey area. GOV. plays a major role. sorry you don't think so. People die off of unregulated companies all the time. If you didn't know that you are not informed but you go ahead and trust a person who see's profits over people.

except that in a free market, a company wouldnt be successful at all if they poisened their consumers.

its not it the best interest of a company to harm their consumers, they will/would quickly go out of business if they did because everyone woul switch to the other competing company that isnt killing them.

there is little to no need for the government to regulate companies.

self regulation by the market will do it wayyy more effectively.



killerzX said:
spaceguy said:
Jexy said:
What Kasz216 said.

Also, el oh el to the guy who trusts the government to regulate things over the private sector.



Yea because a company that has waste won't dump it into your drinking water if they don't regulate him to not do so. So yes the government is there to stop those things. There is a lot of good regulation and bad regulation. This is not a all or nothing, there is a grey area. GOV. plays a major role. sorry you don't think so. People die off of unregulated companies all the time. If you didn't know that you are not informed but you go ahead and trust a person who see's profits over people.

except that in a free market, a company wouldnt be successful at all if they poisened their consumers.

its not it the best interest of a company to harm their consumers, they will/would quickly go out of business if they did because everyone woul switch to the other competing company that isnt killing them.

there is little to no need for the government to regulate companies.

self regulation by the market will do it wayyy more effectively.


No it won't and the 1800 show that. lets wait until people die. Do you know how many companies I can name that are killing people right now and no one is doing a fucking thing. This site is full of, you guessed it, smart guys. Poisesn don't just kill people. Sometimes it takes years. So who is going to notice, until it's to late. How many products can you think of that have been banned that stuck around for 100's of years. Lead paint, cancerious polution and many other things. 

What about the guy down stream from a corporation that dumps chemicals in the water or into the ground. This also cause's cancer but hey they will go out of business. .

I'm done with this thread for a while. You people are something else. Maybe when this country is a smoking pile of sh-t you will actually wake up to intelligence.

There is a sayin that goes around my college, don't even talk to the guy that watch's fox news, He's to stupid to even understand common sense. What makes you think he could understand Politics. This is very much the truth.

So in conclusion, the 1800's was exactly what you all want to so bad. it was a horrible time in america and corporations destroyed dreams, hopes and lifes. The free market does not just run on it's own, it can but do you think you or I can survive it. No. The free market is a stupid idea. Almost all bizz would get destroyed in a free market and only the most corrupt and the most evil will survive. I will say it again america has a bunch of stupid fucks that like to take all of there info from the guy fucking them in the ass.



spaceguy said:
killerzX said:
spaceguy said:
Jexy said:
What Kasz216 said.

Also, el oh el to the guy who trusts the government to regulate things over the private sector.



Yea because a company that has waste won't dump it into your drinking water if they don't regulate him to not do so. So yes the government is there to stop those things. There is a lot of good regulation and bad regulation. This is not a all or nothing, there is a grey area. GOV. plays a major role. sorry you don't think so. People die off of unregulated companies all the time. If you didn't know that you are not informed but you go ahead and trust a person who see's profits over people.

except that in a free market, a company wouldnt be successful at all if they poisened their consumers.

its not it the best interest of a company to harm their consumers, they will/would quickly go out of business if they did because everyone woul switch to the other competing company that isnt killing them.

there is little to no need for the government to regulate companies.

self regulation by the market will do it wayyy more effectively.


No it won't and the 1800 show that. lets wait until people die. Do you know how many companies I can name that are killing people right now and no one is doing a fucking thing. This site is full of, you guessed it, smart guys. Poisesn don't just kill people. Sometimes it takes years. So who is going to notice, until it's to late. How many products can you think of that have been banned that stuck around for 100's of years. Lead paint, cancerious polution and many other things. 

and how would government regulation fix this problem, are they going to find out about it before people. like I said it requires a free market, and like kaz said it requires a honest and transparent media and government to report on it. that requires a smaller government that gets out of the business of business. becuase that means thes "evil corporations' wont have any lobbying power in the first place. government has pushed for many things and regulated things that they thought were good for us just for it to be found out they were all wrong years later. ethonal is a prime example, government really pushed for subsidies for it, it now turns out its less effiecient and worse for the environment, and increases corn (food) costs.


What about the guy down stream from a corporation that dumps chemicals in the water or into the ground. This also cause's cancer but hey they will go out of business. .

I'm done with this thread for a while. You people are something else. Maybe when this country is a smoking pile of sh-t you will actually wake up to intelligence.

There is a sayin that goes around my college, don't even talk to the guy that watch's fox news, He's to stupid to even understand common sense. What makes you think he could understand Politics. This is very much the truth.

So in conclusion, the 1800's was exactly what you all want to so bad. it was a horrible time in america and corporations destroyed dreams, hopes and lifes. The free market does not just run on it's own, it can but do you think you or I can survive it. No. The free market is a stupid idea. Almost all bizz would get destroyed in a free market and only the most corrupt and the most evil will survive. I will say it again america has a bunch of stupid fucks that like to take all of there info from the guy fucking them in the ass.


no, technology does. it has nothing to do with regulations. do you really think, if we had the rules and regulations we do today bad thing wouldnt happen back in 1800. No, they would either completely ignore them or industry would have been completely halted. every advancement would screech to a complete stop.

what what would happen if applied our regulations to places like indonesia or somalia?

here's a good graph showing my point, time and technology is the answer, not regulations



Around the Network
spaceguy said:

No it won't and the 1800 show that. lets wait until people die. Do you know how many companies I can name that are killing people right now and no one is doing a fucking thing (1). This site is full of, you guessed it, smart guys. Poisesn don't just kill people. Sometimes it takes years. So who is going to notice, until it's to late. How many products can you think of that have been banned that stuck around for 100's of years. Lead paint, cancerious polution and many other things.

So, despite the FDA, EPA, DOH, and the hundreds, if not thousands of other federal, state, and local agencies who's goal is to protect human health and the environment, shit's still going down. Really, how is this an argument for your point? Some of these agencies , for all intents and purposes, have close to ultimate power, and nigh-on limitless funds, and yet you can still list all of these companies? Here's a hint: regulatory bodies do not work.

Also, it is true that many harmful chemicals have been used in products for centuries. But, here's the problem: for most of the chemicals, the dangers were not known or fully understood until recent decades. You cannot blame any institution, public or private, for allowing a chemical in use if the long-term effects were not fully known. Some of these problems take decades to emerge, and a significant body of data needs to be collected before anything is proven. There will be chemicals that we use today, that we believe to be totally harmless, that will probably show evidence of being harmful in the future. We cannot blame the businesses for using them.

Finally, what about all the people that the FDA has killed because it's been over-cautious? The FDA has every incentive to regulate/ban/not license as many chemicals and pharmaceuticals as possible. Why? Because if they don't, and people start getting sick, a lot of questions about the FDA's very existence will be asked... and that's not a debate that the FDA wants. Through being over-cautious, many drugs that could be out today, and saving lives, are still going through over-zealous testing that will last months, if not years. What is not seen is all the people who are sick and dying because of this.

What about the guy down stream from a corporation that dumps chemicals in the water or into the ground. This also cause's cancer but hey they will go out of business.

Like I said before, why can't the EPA stop this? They have full power to do so under their Congressional Authority, and a budget to suit.

Here's a solution: instead of having these water sources be state property, let private citizens own them. They have a direct incentive to protect their water sources, as water is an extremely valuable resource. Maintaining a nice environment also opens them up for tourism money, and things like fishing/boating permits. As a result of this, people won't be able to get away with dumping so easily, th environment will improve, the quality of the water will improve, and it'll save the tax-payers some money, to boot.

I'm done with this thread for a while. You people are something else. Maybe when this country is a smoking pile of sh-t you will actually wake up to intelligence.

Just because somebody doesn't agree with you, doesn't mean they're not intelligent. Here's an idea, come to the UK! We have all the Government you could possibly want, probably more. And, yet, our problems are basically exactly the same as yours. We still have a health care system which rejects people with certain conditions, or provides lower quality to poorer people, we still have a shitty education system, we still have a countryside that's being destroyed, we still have poverty. In many cases, we're much worse off than the USA.

There is a sayin that goes around my college, don't even talk to the guy that watch's fox news, He's to stupid to even understand common sense. What makes you think he could understand Politics. This is very much the truth.

I think very few of the people commenting on this thread watches Fox News, or at least takes it seriously. It is possible to form opinions outside of the mainstream media. The real world isn't all Fox Vs. MSNBC.

So in conclusion, the 1800's was exactly what you all want to so bad. it was a horrible time in america and corporations destroyed dreams, hopes and lifes. The free market does not just run on it's own, it can but do you think you or I can survive it. No. The free market is a stupid idea. Almost all bizz would get destroyed in a free market and only the most corrupt and the most evil will survive. I will say it again america has a bunch of stupid fucks that like to take all of there info from the guy fucking them in the ass.

In conclusion, you've just proven that you don't even know what free markets are, you also don't know your history. Corruption is impossible in a free society, as it requires twisting the arm of somebody who holds a monopoly on violence... that somebody being somebody in the Government (that's all a Government is, btw, it's not some magical institution... it's just an organisation like any other business, the difference being that they have a monopoly on creating laws, and owning big guns. If you think that's a better model for survival, you're naive).





None of what you said proves anything about regulation. If mcdonalds was not regulated they would serve bad food and many places do. I have had food poisening many times from places, did I shut them down, no. Did I get the government in there to check on there ass, yes. So Now they know they better keep on top of there sh-t.

Regulations work because people are scared of the fines and punishment. We just have different views and this site is full of right wing nuts. So its not uncommon for me not to see eye to eye with most that post. However there is a lot here that don't even talk to you people. I have been messaged. People don't see you people as worth a fight.

Places like canada made sure that MONSANTO didn't genetically f-ck with there food but our regulatory has people like you in it, so it's fine. All these steroids have been linked to cancer and many other health issues but because the right don't want to regulate. We barely do. So when you get some f-cked up disease or condition, don't come in here whinning.

 

You know how many foods get caught by these administrations and sent back before they kill people. A lot. I like people checking my food and making sure people arn't f'ing with my water. It works, people are scared to dump oil. Also I worked at a company that was dumping oil into the ground. . So the gov came in a fined there ass and shut them down until they cealed there traps, they don't do it anymore. With out these type of people who knows how many water supplies they tainted. They are still in bizz. So there goes your logic. Have fun with water that starts on fire. Now like I said I will leave you fun guys alone. There are many things you people just can't grasp. Maybe cause your the ones sh-tting on the planet and thats why you come in pounding your chest. Cause your the asshole's that has f-cked the neighborhood pond up or many other things that wild life can't even live or drink out of because your selfish. Regulation stops this type of sh-t. Sh-t if I had control I would put up camara's to catch your ass and  put your ass in going to jail.

If anything we need more regulations, not nearly enough food gets checked. Shit this is because all these aggencies are stocked with people from the private bizz. So there is conflict of interest. So make laws to stop this and you will see sh-t change real fast. Lets not forget global warming. Before you start on this, the whole world believes in this accept dumb americans. Companies our there need to be fined more then there getting fined because they will dump sh-t in lake and the ground becuase it's cheaper to get the fine then to get rid of it properly. Guess why the fine is so low. PEople like you. GREED = YOU

Before you come with some dumb ass excuse why it does. I will not come back to this page.  



SamuelRSmith, did you just state the FDA was over cautious on approving drugs? That is news to me... Fuck the FDA, DEA, EPA, DOH.. They are all bought out. Almost all the people involved in those organizations are looking out for private enterprises (previous employed by the ones they are supposed to regulate). The government regulatory agencies are owned by private companies. Why do you think they still sell shitty anti-depressant drugs that have worse side effects than beneficial and now selling to children. Do you actually believe they have our best interest at heart when they pump kids full of prescription speed for ADHD which almost any kid could be classified as having (with their "symptoms" list). Ever been anxious before a test, excess energy, ever had any symptom of being a kid??? Take this speed is their answer. 



sethnintendo said:

SamuelRSmith, did you just state the FDA was over cautious on approving drugs? That is news to me... Fuck the FDA, DEA, EPA, DOH.. They are all bought out. Almost all the people involved in those organizations are looking out for private enterprises (previous employed by the ones they are supposed to regulate). The government regulatory agencies are owned by private companies. Why do you think they still sell shitty anti-depressant drugs that have worse side effects than beneficial and now selling to children. Do you actually believe they have our best interest at heart when they pump kids full of prescription speed for ADHD which almost any kid could be classified as having (with their "symptoms" list). Ever been anxious before a test, excess energy, ever had any symptom of being a kid??? Take this speed is their answer. 



Yep I completely agree but this is what you get when you got people in the goverment that allow conflict of interest. This should be regulated as well. No Fucks from monstanto, no people form the private orginization that are seen working deals, if so you all go to jail but with people like on this site around. This will never happen. they like to destroy these regulatory systems. Then say, see it doesn't work because we stocked the agency with our own guys and f-cked it all up. JAIL FOR ALL THESE F_CKS> O yea I was one of those people on anti-depressants.

SO what the answer put more laws in place to stop these f-cks and put them in jail.



spaceguy said:
sethnintendo said:

SamuelRSmith, did you just state the FDA was over cautious on approving drugs? That is news to me... Fuck the FDA, DEA, EPA, DOH.. They are all bought out. Almost all the people involved in those organizations are looking out for private enterprises (previous employed by the ones they are supposed to regulate). The government regulatory agencies are owned by private companies. Why do you think they still sell shitty anti-depressant drugs that have worse side effects than beneficial and now selling to children. Do you actually believe they have our best interest at heart when they pump kids full of prescription speed for ADHD which almost any kid could be classified as having (with their "symptoms" list). Ever been anxious before a test, excess energy, ever had any symptom of being a kid??? Take this speed is their answer. 



Yep I completely agree but this is what you get when you got people in the goverment that allow conflict of interest. This should be regulated as well. No Fucks from monstanto, no people form the private orginization that are seen working deals, if so you all go to jail but with people like on this site around. This will never happen. they like to destroy these regulatory systems. Then say, see it doesn't work because we stocked the agency with our own guys and f-cked it all up. JAIL FOR ALL THESE F_CKS> O yea I was one of those people on anti-depressants.

SO what the answer put more laws in place to stop these f-cks and put them in jail.

I like that sentence a lot.  You have made my day.  Monsanto is one of the worst companies in the world.  If you ever watched a documentary about how food is grown, etc then you will discover how evil Monsanto really is.  You are right that private companies stack the government agencies that are supposed to look out for the common good with people that only look out with what is good for their former/current employers.  I am sure they get good kick backs when they brush aside any law/regulation that would hamper their employer/former employer.  You hit the nail on the head that conflict of interest is a huge fucking problem.