By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - Sony still believes in 3D....

Naum on 10 June 2012

I will not bother with 3D until they free us from those damn glasses

yes I know there are 3D glassfree TV's out there but those costs way to much



If it isn't turnbased it isn't worth playing   (mostly)

And shepherds we shall be,

For Thee, my Lord, for Thee. Power hath descended forth from Thy hand, That our feet may swiftly carry out Thy command. So we shall flow a river forth to Thee And teeming with souls shall it ever be. In Nomine Patris, et Filii, et Spiritūs Sancti. -----The Boondock Saints

Around the Network
forest-spirit on 10 June 2012

I don't mind 3D but I don't want to pay extra for it.



Lafiel on 10 June 2012
Naum said:
I will not bother with 3D until they free us from those damn glasses

yes I know there are 3D glassfree TV's out there but those costs way to much

I just don't get why people are so disgusted by the glasses. Especially passive glasses can easily look as stylish as sunglasses and are very light weight, in fact I bought a pair like that (for ~10€) which I wear when I watch 3D movies at the cinema.



Gnac on 10 June 2012
Lafiel said:
Naum said:
I will not bother with 3D until they free us from those damn glasses

yes I know there are 3D glassfree TV's out there but those costs way to much

I just don't get why people are so disgusted by the glasses. Especially passive glasses can easily look as stylish as sunglasses and are very light weight, in fact I bought a pair like that (for ~10€) which I wear when I watch 3D movies at the cinema.

Some of us already wear stylish glasses, and wearing two pairs of stylish glasses at once sort of cancels out the style, and just ends up being ridiculous.



WHERE IS MY KORORINPA 3

Alby_da_Wolf on 10 June 2012
Gnac said:
Lafiel said:
Naum said:
I will not bother with 3D until they free us from those damn glasses

yes I know there are 3D glassfree TV's out there but those costs way to much

I just don't get why people are so disgusted by the glasses. Especially passive glasses can easily look as stylish as sunglasses and are very light weight, in fact I bought a pair like that (for ~10€) which I wear when I watch 3D movies at the cinema.

Some of us already wear stylish glasses, and wearing two pairs of stylish glasses at once sort of cancels out the style, and just ends up being ridiculous.

THIS!!! Not to mention that even not wearing two pairs at a time, a bunch of people all wearing sunglasses indoors is either ridiculous or damn creepy!  =8-O    



Stwike him, Centuwion. Stwike him vewy wuffly! (Pontius Pilate, "Life of Brian")
A fart without stink is like a sky without stars.
TGS, Third Grade Shooter: brand new genre invented by Kevin Butler exclusively for Natal WiiToo Kinect. PEW! PEW-PEW-PEW!   


Around the Network
SvennoJ on 10 June 2012
Lafiel said:
Naum said:
I will not bother with 3D until they free us from those damn glasses

yes I know there are 3D glassfree TV's out there but those costs way to much

I just don't get why people are so disgusted by the glasses. Especially passive glasses can easily look as stylish as sunglasses and are very light weight, in fact I bought a pair like that (for ~10€) which I wear when I watch 3D movies at the cinema.

Well with glasses you always have some cross talk as they never completely block out the other image, and they affect the color quality somewhat. Apart from that, I already wear prescription glasses, glasses on top of glasses is not comfortable at all.
Although LG is already on the ball with that problem, only for passive 3D ofcourse.

Problem with passive 3D is that you only get 1920x540 per eye.

Glasses free tv's that can lock onto your eyes so you can still move around without losing 3D will solve the final problems with cross talk and color loss. Yet you're still stuck with having to focus on a different point in space then where the image appears to be, plus it looks weird when viewing from an angle.