lol black skin and white skin have different regeneration styles? I thought Black skin just meant adaptive evolving process to the sun which created a need for skin protection so the higher level of melanin production was just higher. Burn the melanin off of a black persons hand and what skin tone does he have? Secondly there is no such thing as race between humanity. We just separated and evolved to adapt to our surroundings. In the beginning we were all in one place looking exactly alike.

As for the women and men thing men are more dominant but women aren't slouches themselves. It depends on what personality each individual has within intergender trials. Theres too many variables.

The Regeneration this is very very true, also heres a quick recap of the previous topic.

1.) Black skin has larger Melanosome cells which allows them to absorb considerably more sunlight and radiation than the other races.

2.) Black skin also has considerably higher electrical resistance than its cousins.

3.) Black skin has many more and larger Fibroblasts than White Skin which makes it considerably easier to Scar the skin from simple cuts.

4.) Black Skin is generally thicker than the other races

5.) Asian & Black Skin have Thicker and more Compact Dermis than white skin - which is why Older White people (women in particular) hae FAR more wrinkles around their bodies.

6.)  Black Skin actually shed much faster than the others.

7.) Asian Skin loses 20% less water than Black Skin which loses 50% less water than White Skin.  This means That White Skin can remain MUCH cooler than its counterparts at high temperature, BUT it also means White people get Dehydrated MUCH MUCH faster than everyone else...by a long shot.

8.) White Skin cells regenerate 20% fast than Black skin and 10% faster than Asian skin.

9.) White and Asian skin are equally flexible, and each is far more flexible than Black Skin.

10.) Asian Skin can take more pressure from sharp objects before breaking open.

When you put it this way it makes more sense. It falls in line with location evolution and adaptation..

Interesting stuff... just as confirmation though, what do you mean when you say 'Asian' skin... Asia is a big place. I would guess you are referring to Middle Eastern skin rather than South Eastern Asian, (or even Indonesian, Mongolian or Russian are all arguably different enough in skin tone... though the caucasian russians will obviously be included into white skin)

Also do you mave anything on Hispanic/Mediterranian skin? I know I watched something on Bang Goes the Theory where one of the presenters who had Hispanic roots was proved to have a higher level of melanin and therefore her skin had more protection against UV light.

He meant yellow skins.

@S.T.A.G.E

Actually your supposition would be based on a classical view of natural selection, but the reality is that some traits may not have been evolved at all, but acquired from other groups of early humans. Modern studies have found that upwards of four percent of DNA in non African populations may in fact have come from populations such as the Neanderthals. A group that did share a common ancestor with modern humans, but had split off, and evolved separately for over a hundred thousand years.

The irony being that Caucasian skin may sweat more, because Neanderthals had stockier bodies, and thus needed to sweat more to regulate their body temperature. Obviously it wouldn't be necessary today, because Europeans have more skin area then Neanderthals. Yet it could have persisted in spite of environmental adaptation, because it isn't necessarily that prohibitive to survival. It isn't like Europe is bereft of plentiful water supplies.

Speaking to whether there are races of men. Well scientifically speaking the answer would seem to be yes if you agree with the current classification of Neanderthals being listed as a subspecies of Homo Sapiens. Which if the DNA evidence holds up wouldn't even be worthy of debate, because last I checked two different species cannot mate, and produce viable offspring. So if this all holds up then it is just a matter of deductive logic that the family tree outside of Africa is fundamentally different.

In that different populations outside of Africa may carry the genetic heritage of other populations more of one in particular, or none of another. So in a very real sense parts of us from different parts of the world could be up to a hundred thousand years removed from one another. While I agree with your sentiment which is as I see it a real argument against racism. I think the reality is far more humbling, and far more telling about humanity. The truth is that our ancestors don't seem to have given a fuck about who they would fuck. So why should any of us. It really doesn't seem to have hurt us at all.