By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - Sony Q4 and FY 2011 : PS3 1.9m shipped - PSV 1.8m lifetime.

Hyruken said:
cookingyourmama said:
Hyruken said:
Ps3 massively over tracked then here. It was at 63.9m shipped at end of april and shipped 1.9m meaning for those 3 months an average of 633k. So there is no way on earth it did an additional 200k in the following week as its average would be around 150k-158k a week.
Which would then mean zero stock on shelves and mass shortages which obviously isn't the case seeing as here in uk at least some stores recently have cut its price, they wouldn't do that if it's demand was as high as vgc indicates.

So we are looking at around 1m over tracked minimum for sure because to think there is anything less then 600k left on shelves is silly. But I'm sure the usual suspects will try and argue vgc is right....

Hahahahahahahaha no the ps3 is not overtracked by 1m, seriously your pro 360 agenda is getting embarrassing now.

As I said one rule for one, and a different rule for the other. If it is okay for Sony to have such little stock on shelves why is it not okay for 360 to have as little stock on shelves?

Because the tracking services tell us how much each has sold?



Around the Network
theprof00 said:
Hyruken said:
cookingyourmama said:
Hyruken said:
Ps3 massively over tracked then here. It was at 63.9m shipped at end of april and shipped 1.9m meaning for those 3 months an average of 633k. So there is no way on earth it did an additional 200k in the following week as its average would be around 150k-158k a week.
Which would then mean zero stock on shelves and mass shortages which obviously isn't the case seeing as here in uk at least some stores recently have cut its price, they wouldn't do that if it's demand was as high as vgc indicates.

So we are looking at around 1m over tracked minimum for sure because to think there is anything less then 600k left on shelves is silly. But I'm sure the usual suspects will try and argue vgc is right....

Hahahahahahahaha no the ps3 is not overtracked by 1m, seriously your pro 360 agenda is getting embarrassing now.

As I said one rule for one, and a different rule for the other. If it is okay for Sony to have such little stock on shelves why is it not okay for 360 to have as little stock on shelves?

Because the tracking services tell us how much each has sold?


What tracking services? Are you talking about Nintendos numbers? Didn't they say in their report that Sony shipped more then 2m for the past quarter and thats with only tracking a part of the market not all of it? If thats the case again like I said before who are you going to believe knows more about their own numbers Sony or Nintendo?



How ridiculous someone here said $99 Xbox with subscription fee is MS trying to sell their over-stocked 360. The purpose of this is testing if this kind of business can be suitable for gaming industry and perhaps implent in the next gen (this is explained by the analysts.)

I really don't understand the posts from those anti-xbox fans.



kowenicki said:
theprof00 said:
kowenicki said:
people are really trying to argue that the PS3 is supply constrained....? really ?



I mentioned that since they reduced numbers due to Thai flooding, then their shipments overall may be undershipped by the same percentage, richard.

red herring.

go look at the slides in their presentation.... always a good idea to check facts behind PR guff in these announcements.

 

they had a supply issue for all their electronics as ALL manufacturers did in the previous quarter as supply dipped but that has now climbed and is pretty much on with what they always try to have for all of their products... i.e. more than 50 days of supply (inventory).   If they have the usual 50 days plus of inventory then why would they be struggling to meed demand chains?

Its overtracked.

I never said it wasn't overtracked. I'm debating by how much. The 360-guy concensus is that it should be what 360 numbers are, and I don't think that's the case at all.



theprof00 said:

Price cuts are not designed to increase sales but to combat slowing sales. Overstocked is a likely scenario given the timing of announcement.

They're not pulling it out of their asses either. It is a brilliant strategy to also make it look like their live subscriptions are increasing. Remember this is only a limited time coupon. http://content.microsoftstore.com/store/xblive2yr-offer/

Use your mafia head. Why would MS offer this deal only for a limited time, only as a coupon, and only at MS stores. Apparently no other retailer ordered too much stock (or they would've dropped price), and no tracking company knows where the other shipments are. MS made it a goal to be #1 last year, shipped. Do you think, possibly, in any way, they might have over-ordered their own product in order to beat out the competition in shipments, and now have too much stock and are subsequently "dropping" the price?

Which stores were offering these 199$ ps3s? I was only aware of gamestop. There was some 199$ during Christmas, but that's to be expected. I'm talkign about recently.

Not sure is serious...

Without crazy conspiracy theories and heavily biased banter there's really only the one conclusion.  PS3 is overtracked here.

I'm not saying that their might not be more stock of the 360 lying around (there is no PROOF of that, but you appear to want to believe it is a large number), and I'm not saying that some retailers might not be experiencing stocking issues with the PS3 (again, no PROOF of that, just your speculation) but without those two unproven things being true and both being a very large number, the PS3 is overtracked.

Honestly, you must just be trying to push peoples buttons here - you dont honestly believe these things...do you??



Around the Network
zhao3gold said:
How ridiculous someone here said $99 Xbox with subscription fee is MS trying to sell their over-stocked 360. The purpose of this is testing if this kind of business can be suitable for gaming industry and perhaps implent in the next gen.

I really don't understand the posts from those anti-xbox fans.

I think it's a very logical solution to the question of "if 360 is undertracked, then where are the consoles".

MS said they would be #1 shipped. They came close. And now we think there are nearly 1.5m+ on shelves. But where are those consoles? Nobody is reporting overstock or having a price drop....that is, nobody is having a price drop except MS stores. Don't tell me you don't think that's strange. I mean, c'mon.

Sure maybe it isn't the solution, but it is a logical one. And for you to just dispute a theory without giving any real argument, especially not anything logical, well...that's just typical, isn't it.



pezus said:
Hyruken said:
theprof00 said:
Hyruken said:
cookingyourmama said:
Hyruken said:
Ps3 massively over tracked then here. It was at 63.9m shipped at end of april and shipped 1.9m meaning for those 3 months an average of 633k. So there is no way on earth it did an additional 200k in the following week as its average would be around 150k-158k a week.
Which would then mean zero stock on shelves and mass shortages which obviously isn't the case seeing as here in uk at least some stores recently have cut its price, they wouldn't do that if it's demand was as high as vgc indicates.

So we are looking at around 1m over tracked minimum for sure because to think there is anything less then 600k left on shelves is silly. But I'm sure the usual suspects will try and argue vgc is right....

Hahahahahahahaha no the ps3 is not overtracked by 1m, seriously your pro 360 agenda is getting embarrassing now.

As I said one rule for one, and a different rule for the other. If it is okay for Sony to have such little stock on shelves why is it not okay for 360 to have as little stock on shelves?

Because the tracking services tell us how much each has sold?


What tracking services? Are you talking about Nintendos numbers? Didn't they say in their report that Sony shipped more then 2m for the past quarter and thats with only tracking a part of the market not all of it? If thats the case again like I said before who are you going to believe knows more about their own numbers Sony or Nintendo?

Nintendo don't report Sony shipped numbers lol. 

Exactly!

They report sold numbers i.e sold to consumers right? But as I said they only cover around 90% of the market?

So if Sony SHIPPED 1.9m last quarter (since start of the year) and Nintendo said they SOLD over 2.27m (since the start of this year) then that means 370k were SOLD from the previous shipment for the PS3 this year. And if we then say that it is missing 10% tracked we can take a rough guess that it will be 10% of that 2.27m, so at bare minimum another 200k from the start of the year. 

So if we use Nintendo's SOLD numbers they would have it at 2.47m sold from the start of the year. While PS3 shipped 1.9m for all terotories from the start of the year. Which if anything shows that there is no supply problems at all seeing as based on Nintendo's figures nearly 20% of the christmas holiday shipment was sold this year....



TRios_Zen said:

Not sure is serious...

Without crazy conspiracy theories and heavily biased banter there's really only the one conclusion.  PS3 is overtracked here.

I'm not saying that their might not be more stock of the 360 lying around (there is no PROOF of that, but you appear to want to believe it is a large number), and I'm not saying that some retailers might not be experiencing stocking issues with the PS3 (again, no PROOF of that, just your speculation) but without those two unproven things being true and both being a very large number, the PS3 is overtracked.

Honestly, you must just be trying to push peoples buttons here - you dont honestly believe these things...do you??

What a flamer.

Try using english so I can respond to your post next time. :D

1) I didn't say ps3 wasn't overtracked.
2) It's not a conspiracy theory, it's pretty blatant logic.
-fact1: MS shipped numbers are higher than any sales tracking firm, ANY
-fact2: Nobody knows where these consoles are
-fact3: No retailer has dropped price, which would indicate overstock
-fact4: MS is having a psuedo price drop
-fact5: It is "for a limited time"

I'm not appearing to be saying anything. It is only by your own viewpoint that you abse such a decision.

We have a question of how much is ps3 overtracked. The answers thus far have been "it either is as stocked as 360", or "it is less stocked as 360, and 360 is undertracked", or "ps3 is fine", or "ps3 is overtracked somewhat".

My response answers all questions unilaterally. 360 is fine where it is, as indicated by the facts we have. ps3 is overtracked, and likely by 500k given how much stock is typical at this time of year, and also possibly slowing down the production when they are currently losing money on it as written in the Sony FY release.

You don't want to speculate using logic, then that's fine. I'll give it a shot though.



theprof00 said:
NotStan said:

Price cuts are not designed to increase sales but to combat slowing sales. Overstocked is a likely scenario given the timing of announcement.

They're not pulling it out of their asses either. It is a brilliant strategy to also make it look like their live subscriptions are increasing. Remember this is only a limited time coupon. http://content.microsoftstore.com/store/xblive2yr-offer/

Use your mafia head. Why would MS offer this deal only for a limited time, only as a coupon, and only at MS stores. Apparently no other retailer ordered too much stock (or they would've dropped price), and no tracking company knows where the other shipments are. MS made it a goal to be #1 last year, shipped. Do you think, possibly, in any way, they might have over-ordered their own product in order to beat out the competition in shipments, and now have too much stock and are subsequently "dropping" the price?

Which stores were offering these 199$ ps3s? I was only aware of gamestop. There was some 199$ during Christmas, but that's to be expected. I'm talkign about recently.

Now now, that's just going way too much into detail, so you're saying that MS is currently sitting on about ~1M xbox's in their warehouses because they purposely overshipped just to appear better in their financial results? Don't you think that's a bit far fetched? After all this is a company that was not prepared to sacrifice profits for the last 3 years and didn't bother announcing an official price cut, if anyone Sony would be capable of doing something like that, with the numerous price cuts and increased marketing effort that has been happening the last few years, pushing much harder in an attempt to achieve higher shipments than the competition. It's a far fetched theory that unfortunately doesn't hold much weight as it would be out of character.

Amazon pricematched them I believe, in UK sainsbury's, tesco, morrison's etc often have sales on PS3 too, about £159 - like £30 or so under RRP.



Disconnect and self destruct, one bullet a time.

pezus said:
smbu2000 said:
Troll_Whisperer said:
When the gap was reduced to 1.9 I knew it was too good to be true. There were no numbers backing that up (unless MS had shipped zero X360s).

But, but MS supposedly shipped 0 consoles this past quarter. Other posters here told me so... -_-

Uhm, if so they were mainly the 360 fans making jokes. Probably you included. I did not see anyone but 360 fans saying 0 consoles would be shipped.

Why, yes I did predict 0 consoles shipped for MS last quarter. Oh wait...

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4518605




starcraft: "I and every PS3 fanboy alive are waiting for Versus more than FFXIII.
Me since the games were revealed, the fanboys since E3."

Skeeuk: "playstation 3 is the ultimate in gaming acceleration"