By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General Discussion - Mafia Round 40. Pokemon! Gotta Catch them all!

morenoingrato said:

Wait a second... this is on the main OP.

"Anyway, Here at pokepark we have various of pokemon. Only the certified trainers are allowed inside but don't fret you can watch the whole activity. Trainers battle it out with pokemons and catch them."

Okay, this tells me that HD's theory is a big well done lie, this suggests that trainers and Pokemon are teams, and that there are some corrupts trainers and Pokemon.

Also, HD, I forgot to mention, very soon, someone will die, and when they do, we are going to see if you are lying or not. Even if it is not today.

Trainers(Mafia) are battling pokemon(Town) and trying to catch them.

If you were a pokemon you would know that pokemon=town, but you're suggesting otherwise.



Around the Network
Linkzmax said:
Vote: morenoingrato
1. Contradiction!
2. You can do that without making them into a group of could-be siblings.

Contradiction? I narrow it down, if we figure none of them is a sibling, HD is easily lynchable. If there is a sibling, he better not tell us.

But I wanted to, so we could get info from specific people.



Linkzmax said:
morenoingrato said:

Wait a second... this is on the main OP.

"Anyway, Here at pokepark we have various of pokemon. Only the certified trainers are allowed inside but don't fret you can watch the whole activity. Trainers battle it out with pokemons and catch them."

Okay, this tells me that HD's theory is a big well done lie, this suggests that trainers and Pokemon are teams, and that there are some corrupts trainers and Pokemon.

Also, HD, I forgot to mention, very soon, someone will die, and when they do, we are going to see if you are lying or not. Even if it is not today.

Trainers(Mafia) are battling pokemon(Town) and trying to catch them.

If you were a pokemon you would know that pokemon=town, but you're suggesting otherwise.

Are you supporting HD's theory of Pokemon = Town and Humans = Mafia?

I don't want to assume too many things from this sole flavor, but don't think it's all trainers Vs. all Pokemon.



Linkz, why don't you finish reading it all before jumping to conclusions?



morenoingrato said:
Linkzmax said:
Vote: morenoingrato
1. Contradiction!
2. You can do that without making them into a group of could-be siblings.

Contradiction? I narrow it down, if we figure none of them is a sibling, HD is easily lynchable. If there is a sibling, he better not tell us.

But I wanted to, so we could get info from specific people.

No. It only works if you either want the sibling to claim or want the absence of a claim so that HD is without a doubt lying scum. Narrowing the list and getting thoughts so you can figure out who isn't the sibling is only going to out the sibling even if they don't claim.

Right, so you ask us what we think without naming us as a group within which the sibling exists.



Around the Network
spurgeonryan said:
Linkz! You were on for that long just lurking? What will the ramifications of that be I wonder!


I do not even check this game. Most people are probably trying to catch up with the mountain of posts.

I didn't say I was lurking, just surprised you didn't call me one. I've been catching up with the mountain of posts during this time.



morenoingrato said:

Are you supporting HD's theory of Pokemon = Town and Humans = Mafia?

I don't want to assume too many things from this sole flavor, but don't think it's all trainers Vs. all Pokemon.

Are you claiming to be a non-pokemon townie?

I'm nearly all caught up. But I doubt there's any harm in putting you at 2 votes at this time when 10 are needed.



Linkzmax said:
morenoingrato said:

Are you supporting HD's theory of Pokemon = Town and Humans = Mafia?

I don't want to assume too many things from this sole flavor, but don't think it's all trainers Vs. all Pokemon.

Are you claiming to be a non-pokemon townie?

I'm nearly all caught up. But I doubt there's any harm in putting you at 2 votes at this time when 10 are needed.

No, I'm a Pokemon townie, but I don't want to rule out the possibility of a non-Pokemon townie.



Linkzmax said:
morenoingrato said:
Linkzmax said:
Vote: morenoingrato
1. Contradiction!
2. You can do that without making them into a group of could-be siblings.

Contradiction? I narrow it down, if we figure none of them is a sibling, HD is easily lynchable. If there is a sibling, he better not tell us.

But I wanted to, so we could get info from specific people.

No. It only works if you either want the sibling to claim or want the absence of a claim so that HD is without a doubt lying scum. Narrowing the list and getting thoughts so you can figure out who isn't the sibling is only going to out the sibling even if they don't claim.

Right, so you ask us what we think without naming us as a group within which the sibling exists.

1. Fair point.

2. I don't think it actually matters though, you're making a big deal out of nothing.



I have two other points that will be posted once I'm done with the last 100+ posts.