I was notified that he was town and that he had a piece of paper, because I misinterpreted my original message I thought I would also receive that piece of paper. I probably should have cleared things up with Stefl before hand, but the important thing is that I got it right now. Thus, we should move on and focus on what really matters.

Correct, and I cannot lose my item.

Not fully. An item that both keeps the user alive and gives out some important information seems too powerful.(meta) I do think if it is legit that it is more likely to implicate Trucks as the killer than otherwise, as there's zero reason to include him on the piece of paper besides that. If it's just a random name that flips to being too cruel of an item.(again meta)

Do not buy, not one bit.. lynch all liars. Not so much the going back on what was originally said part, but there is no chance you didn't know you had an item and it was player bound from the start.

Vote: supermario128

This doesn't mean prof must be scum as well, but it's hard to see why he'd defend a town prof without latching onto the claim and voting trucks.(Or did he? VOTALS!?!?!)

Don't know, perhaps they're not sure how player bound items work. Perhaps mario forgot it's not roles, but items that cause the actions and his scummates quickly told him to fix his mistake. Whatever the case, he's lying about it.

Furthermore, I'd venture to guess that if the lie is based on reality, he's some kind of flavor/role(as in item) cop.

I already said I messed up and should have clarified with Stefl. I admit this does look very suspicious and I don't blame anyone for thinking so, but lynching the cop because he made a silly/ stupid mistake is a terrible idea. I haven't lied about what I have said so far and did not mean to misinform anybody. If people don't believe I am the cop then let me scan someone tonight so I can report my findings at the start of the day. This will confirm I am the cop since I will also be able to tell you what item they have, not just alliance.

I could maybe understand being confused about learning what item a player holds at the time of the scan. Not knowing you hold a player bound item doesn't fly though.

As for your bargain, no thanks. Not interested in a claim tomorrow that still wouldn't prove your alliance.

Well, I'm off to bed and won't be back online until Wednesday night around 10pm.

If the town comes to a conclusion on who to lynch; I want to remind the doctor to protect me tonight.

If people really don't believe me, good luck winning without the cop.

Btw, I still think Trucks is our best option at this point and we should act on that. If not him then we should consider Nen or Linkz.

F OS @ Proff & his fortune cookie......wait that didnt sound right.

Now that makes more sense, I thought it was clear that items define the roles hence why there is no (role) field in the game table.

The only thing that bothers me is that you have both the abilities of a normal cop & a flavor cop. 

I mean getting an innocent read on a player is enough, but knowing the item he hold is a over powering (especially in a game with cookie jars).

Stefl really is messing with us in this game.

Will do votals in an hour... sorry for not keeping you up-to-date... my vita is robing my life (WAHAHAHA!!!)