morenoingrato said:
theprof00 said:
So then why are you trying to convince people that your non-vote was similar to a no-lynch vote?
Seems like you're just trying to smooth over accusations. Either you wanted a lynch or you didn't.
Don't tell me "Well, the main thing I wanted is to have the day finished at some point, and I not casting a vote on anyone is not the same as no-lynch, but it's also simmilar." and then a minute, when I show you just how wrong you are, you say "oh well it really wasn't that at all"....
..You know what, it doesn't matter. You 're freakin' mafia, I can smell it off of ya
|
I am not voting, therefore, I am not lynching anyone myself.
|
requoting myself. Maybe you'll read it this time despite having already responded to it.
"Except, had you read the rules, you would have known (as someone also brought up) that by the time limit, any non-votes are thrown out, thereby, you not voting is equal to the vote pool only being 11, meaning that it only takes 6 to lynch instead of 7. So really, you are casting a vote for the popular lynch without looking like you're casting a vote.
No, that's not similar to no lynch at all, especially given that no lynch only had one vote, and a couple users were at 3, pushing 4."