Linkzmax said:
Screw quotes...
1. One it would be odd if Stefl made a table of 11 players, excluding FF after he had given him a role. And two there's no way he rerolled everyone after correcting the table. You guys go ahead and do whatever you want about FF, but I'm not going to suspect him anytime soon.
2. I put prof at L-1 momentarily, and had I not refreshed before posting, moreno could have voted without noname's unvote and it would have been a hammer instead. There was a 2 minute gap between their votes as has been mentioned.
Yay radish is going to follow a game of Mafia that he's playing in. I didn't mention this last round as to why radish wasn't targeted night one, but most scumteams aren't going to kill him because he's prone to rash hammering and/or not making good cases against mafia. That doesn't mean he should be lynched as a liability, but good townies need to recognize his shortfalls.
I suspect the better items are player bound for what it's worth. The non-player bound items certainly should be interesting though.
|
I'm back and quoting as a read, sorry if I bring back old stuff.
1. Just to be clear, you're basing your FF observations on the OP table in this thread and not the sign-up list? I didn't notice the OP changing but if that's so then you may be on to something.
2. Your sentence makes no sense. No matter how many times you refreshed your page, noname's unvote would always have taken place before moreno's vote unless your browser has the ability to alter the space-time continuum. I'm guessing, what you were trying to say is that if you hadn't refreshed your page AND if noname didn't unvote you could have hammered prof.