That's an awfully broad charge to defend against; other than just trying to post more I don't know what to say to that unless you get more specific.  Or maybe that's all you mean, in which case I apologize. 

How about the amount of exchange he had with (was it spurge?).

He want on an awful lot back and forth as my votals show. Spurge thought noc was mafia based on his insistence, I thought it looked town.

Given what was going on, would you say it would be stupid for mafia to garner so much attention?

1.Then, his insistence that I'm rolefishing. Would you venture to call these "little annoances" desperate attempts?

2. Further, there is something I noticed above when I mentioned that it was odd that noc had not considered me and linkz as being a scum team given my behavior today. When I mentioned that it seemed scummy to not mention the possibility of a linkz/prof scum team, one of his next posts was an HoS on Linkz.

Not only that, but (while I am not a cop), there could be the case that I am a cop, or something cop like. Why would he neither theorize that I am mafia cavorting with a teammate, nor a cop who has cleared linkz? And why would he continue to go after me with such weak analysis?

If he was mafia, would you say it looks like a pretty lazy effort? I would.

Like this. What is the implication of the post to you? Why would he regret it?

First, please address the bold, italicized, and underlined question.

1. This stuff about Stefl would all be relevant if you had mentioned anything day 2, or when I had originally made the point about rolefishing.

That is the only post of prof's of all the ones you claim to be rolefishing that I would agree with.(Some others are blatant nudges for claims, which as I said I didn't like, but it's different from rolefishing) However, it doesn't make sense to think that Stefl and prof are scummates in this case. They would have to KNOW you visited Stefl, which means one should have to be a Mafia Tracker, which followed you to Stefl. If you're investigative they're going to hope you don't claim damning info on Stefl instead of pushing you to reveal it. If you don't spill anything they can assume you're protective or something else, and possibly try to get you lynched. Either way they would be happy to kill you at night.

My second question was directly related to the first. How did you think scum Stefl was rolefishing with his first post, which he later clarified meant he was roleblocked?

2. See no. 1 as well. You made none of these points yesterday, when it actually mattered. It's easy to say you were thinking just about anything then, but nothing backs it up.

3. I appreciate you fixing the links. It's actually a bit bothersome that nobody else pointed out any of the errors, am I the only one that cared to read your post?

I mentioned it in no. 1, but that is rolefishing to me. Only makes sense as that with Stefl being town and prof being scum though. Mafia would know if they targeted Stefl and could try to pin it on someone else, or if they weren't the ones to target him they could try to figure out who was and net two town powers in one fell swoop. But I don't think asking the other mason to claim means much. There are pros and cons to making the information known, and I think in the end it benefits Town to know more than scum.

Now that post is a solid point for you. And it's a direct contradiction to what prof asked Stefl after Stefl claimed he was roleblocked. I don't think I was defending, just defining things, pointing out broken links, and explaining why I thought your theory was very unlikely or in other words what I think prof wasn't doing. I didn't explain what I thought prof was doing, and I'd like to hear that too. What's nagging me most with prof is he's avoiding a lot of the stuff asked of him. It's not enough to push him higher than you or FF on my scumspect list, but he's not moving down towards Wonk's level either.

4. Again, thanks for the fix. But you didn't answer my question, "In the end, Stefl's case was that he was blocked and it's a null tell as to my alignment... What defense is needed?"

5. I'd like to try to follow your logic as to how you think I'm preparing to vote for Stefl. Please give the links again and explain what I am saying in each one, in your opinion. Your new explanation still doesn't make sense to me. Why would scum try to divert their votes away from the claimed power?

In the practice round you didn't have me "figured out" as in you realized I was a SK. I was hostile towards you because as third-party my only chance of winning was to have you mislynched and then hope the right actions occur to let me survive until the end. Here, even if I were mafia and you were town, I'd have 3(or 2 accounting for radish's "confirmedness") other people I could push to be mislynched. There's no need for hostility in that case. If I'm hostile it's because I most likely need two correct lynches out of two chances. So if you're town, I don't want to read a wall of text with little to no point or an illogical point. I'm pushing you to prove to me that you're actually town or to crack as scum.

What is the "this" that you think mafia were hesitant to address? "by linkz"

First of I think I screwed on my sentences again. It's clear enough to my point because of my continues editing to check if I have wrong grammar before I post it. I think I accidentally deleted some sentence/s and when I edit it. I thought my other sentences is still part of the the other sentences.

Anyways, I am conveying 2 different points.

1. With stefl flipping town. The mafia doesn't want to address this anymore because maybe stefl was right that there is a  mafia roleblocker. Again with prof's rolefishing when he qouted me. If prof is scum he doesn't want to address this.

2. With stefl first response. I think the mafia's is waiting for some townies to qoute stefl. If someone will challenge it. I think the scums is hunting for more roles.

So is that clear enough?

I'll first qoute this.

1. I already explain it and I am annoyed that I have to explain it again. Linkz was right all of you didn't bother reading my whole posts. You guys don't want to bother reading all of my posts. You guys read what guys want to read so if you see your name in there. You only focused on that and ignore the other points I am trying to make.

Anyways, I can't take off the feeling of rolefishing.  Usually I follow my guts. That's what happen when I played first time as a cop. Following post and then make a theory and follow my instinct. I won't always try to meta game. I will always think outside the box. With my experience playing here. Katherine a fucking vanilla only??? Cave johnson. A fucking vanilla??  That's why I open up another possibilities that stefl brought up like Chell and cube being scum. 

You know what I think about Rad. I really don't want to post this because this is wildest theory I have so far and will make myself look bad. I am thinking he is a mafia mason. Mafia mason even though a part of the mason group doesn't know the alignment of the other guy. You thoerize that there is a possiblity that Spurge doesn't know his fellow mason on day 1 and maybe the reason is that Rad is a mafia mason. I hope Rad will now contribute more with this.

2. Do you think that it didn't it occur to me? Why do you think I am targeting you two? Obviously, you don't see what I am trying to do and didn't you see the post that I think linkz is defending you. You didn't even bother reading my all of lenghty post. If you did you could have point out that some of my links only links towards to the pages and not the view post or maybe you notice it but don't want to bother telling me (i don't want you thinking that it didn't occur to me aswell). Also both of you have the same suspect. FF and me. Also 2 of you are in the stefl convo and voted for baalz. Also you 2 or 3 if you count stefl (which in before I thought your scum buddy) the front runners in lynching moreno. Did you read the part were I say 2 out 3 that was involved in there could be scum? Or am I not clear enough. And in before you said that I also could you and FF. Yes you are right but I am not ruling out the possiblity that you and linkz are scum buddies.

3. At the last paragraph do you think I am very stupid to post something oh maybe prof is the cop. Didn't it ever occur to you that it already run through my head re-reading and re-reading the whole thread? I already read some post thinking you are a cop. I am just opening up possibilities and one thing I learned from the other rounds is to never trust anyone if I am a town. I should always be supicious of the other players.  

Well, since you are the one who brought up the topic. I already have a theory if you are a cop then the stefl joke theory is valid. Imagine 1 human, 1 other and 1 machine. linkz is cleared and Rad is somewhat cleared. Why do you think I even brought up the chell scum theory? Do you think I didn't covered you being a cop already? Why do you think I want to read the 999 thread were FF and wonks are scum? I want to find clue on how they play as scum together. Do you think I am not that sucpicios of wonk?

Why do you think I don't want to post that I think you are a cop? If we lycnh a mafia or worst comes to worst we agree on a no-lynch. I will give of an important info for the scum they might kill you. Sigh!!!!

And Obviously, I also don't want to rule out the possiblity that you are scum since you are a human aswell.

In any case  I am going to list my of potential scum buddies.

Prof & FF= explained

FF & wonk= explained

Links & Prof= I kinda explained it.

Wonk & links= They want to have a lynch right now. If IIRC they haven't talk about themselved a lot this day 3 phase.

And Obviously, I also don't want to rule out the possiblity that you are scum since you are a human aswell.

PS: It's either you are underestimating my line of thought or if you are a scum you are using the no 2 and 3 to make look bad and using it against me. 

I'll first qoute this.

1. I already explain it and I am annoyed that I have to explain it again. Linkz was right all of you didn't bother reading my whole posts. You guys don't want to bother reading all of my posts. You guys read what guys want to read so if you see your name in there. You only focused on that and ignore the other points I am trying to make.

Anyways, I can't take off the feeling of rolefishing.  Usually I follow my guts. That's what happen when I played first time as a cop. Following post and then make a theory and follow my instinct. I won't always try to meta game. I will always think outside the box. With my experience playing here. Katherine a fucking vanilla only??? Cave johnson. A fucking vanilla??  That's why I open up another possibilities that stefl brought up like Chell and cube being scum. 

You know what I think about Rad. I really don't want to post this because this is wildest theory I have so far and will make myself look bad. I am thinking he is a mafia mason. Mafia mason even though a part of the mason group doesn't know the alignment of the other guy. You thoerize that there is a possiblity that Spurge doesn't know his fellow mason on day 1 and maybe the reason is that Rad is a mafia mason. I hope Rad will now contribute more with this.

2. Do you think that it didn't it occur to me? Why do you think I am targeting you two? Obviously, you don't see what I am trying to do and didn't you see the post that I think linkz is defending you. You didn't even bother reading my all of lenghty post. If you did you could have point out that some of my links only links towards to the pages and not the view post or maybe you notice it but don't want to bother telling me (i don't want you thinking that it didn't occur to me aswell). Also both of you have the same suspect. FF and me. Also 2 of you are in the stefl convo and voted for baalz. Also you 2 or 3 if you count stefl (which in before I thought your scum buddy) the front runners in lynching moreno. Did you read the part were I say 2 out 3 that was involved in there could be scum? Or am I not clear enough. And in before you said that I also could you and FF. Yes you are right but I am not ruling out the possiblity that you and linkz are scum buddies.

3. At the last paragraph do you think I am very stupid to post something oh maybe prof is the cop. Didn't it ever occur to you that it already run through my head re-reading and re-reading the whole thread? I already read some post thinking you are a cop. I am just opening up possibilities and one thing I learned from the other rounds is to never trust anyone if I am a town. I should always be supicious of the other players.  

Well, since you are the one who brought up the topic. I already have a theory if you are a cop then the stefl joke theory is valid. Imagine 1 human, 1 other and 1 machine. linkz is cleared and Rad is somewhat cleared. Why do you think I even brought up the chell scum theory? Do you think I didn't covered you being a cop already? Why do you think I want to read the 999 thread were FF and wonks are scum? I want to find clue on how they play as scum together. Do you think I am not that sucpicios of wonk?

Why do you think I don't want to post that I think you are a cop? If we lycnh a mafia or worst comes to worst we agree on a no-lynch. I will give of an important info for the scum they might kill you. Sigh!!!!

And Obviously, I also don't want to rule out the possiblity that you are scum since you are a human aswell.

In any case  I am going to list my of potential scum buddies.

Prof & FF= explained

FF & wonk= explained

Links & Prof= I kinda explained it.

Wonk & links= They want to have a lynch right now. If IIRC they haven't talk about themselved a lot this day 3 phase.

And Obviously, I also don't want to rule out the possiblity that you are scum since you are a human aswell.

PS: It's either you are underestimating my line of thought or if you are a scum you are using the no 2 and 3 to make look bad and using it against me.