Okay, so not 'very good' that's all I wanted to know.

I'll have to disagree with you on the length of the game mattering at all here. This is like forgetting that you're Town really.

What is the contradiction I am defending? You didn't comprehend the logic in what he posted. I gave you the logic that explained how I comprehended his post differently.

Linkz if someone town or scum makes many mistakes in a short period of time they are more likely to be lynched than someone who does it much more spread out in the game.

one of your main suspects who just made a point about spurge that I dont think is acurate yet you agree with.....

Also to add a bit spurges post explained why he though prof was scummy and asked him some questions even if they made the accusation less strong. Yours didn't have any explanatin or change in behavios towards moren. If anything it seems like you are just trying to distance yourself from the resutls of the lynch and setting up prof for tomorrow.

" That Was a pretty scummy thing to do Prof. What if the guy got freaked out by what you said and ended up saying something stupid and get even more attention on him? Assuming he is town, you would have sabotaged a town player by your trickery. Or do you think that is just how it goes? "

First sentence is obvious. The implication of the second is obvious, though given radish's alignment was unknown it's altogether meaningless. Third, if your comprehension is assumed, means town wouldn't want to sabotage town, thus prof is scum. Fourth then makes it a less strong accusation, so it must be directed at a possible town prof. However, town prof wouldn't know radish is town thus the rest of the post falls apart.

It really only made sense if it's a manipulative post directed at a town prof. And then spurge says he's already learned that prof is willing to give up a fellow townie...

There is only ever one "very good" on day one

at the bolded why does you saying this bother me so much? hmmm....

the 4th sentence starts with Or as in bringing up a new possibility or answering the question for prof.

"You are really cool. I had a great time last night.  Do you want to do x, y and z with me? or do you not want to see me again?"

The worrisome bit to me at the time was "but you picking up the pace says town to me (if he actually does turn up mafia)", felt like setting ME up for a lynch tomorrow.(Sure the contra-positive isn't explicit) And yet here I am with my vote still on moreno even though prof(and Stefl's for that matter) are also there. If I thought moreno to be town then I'd have unvoted and it would be on Stefl or prof instead. 

I'm more inclined to think prof gave up on moreno(as scummates) and used me to also make himself look better than I am to think he used me for a mislynch. It's also possible I'm wrong on him and he's town as well.

I feel 'very good' about radish. :p

Why would that bother you? moreno made posts that should never have occured from the mindset of someone without a named character. It's like he had forgotten that when he made them.

Have to disagree with your example since the question doesn't actually change anything from the statement. It's like

"If x, then y will occur. Or do you think y will just occur because of x?"

Whatever, it's useless to argue over this. You're not even acknowledging what spurge said after the fact, which makes the whole line of questioning moot.