By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Doucheongames- er, Bruceongames gets a new job

superchunk said:
I can't believe anyone still follows him.


There are a lot of blind mobile game zealots out there that do now.   But for any consoel gamers that liked him back when he bashed Wii, they don't follow him anymore.  He's burned that bridge too.  

Had 2 debates with him today because he claimed he iPad would sell better than Vita as proof that iPad was a better games platform and athat all boxed retail should be ended today.  



The rEVOLution is not being televised

Around the Network

Lol I love my last post in that thread.



Viper1 said:
Kasz216 said:
Viper1 said:
spurgeonryan said:
Viper1 said:
I get to debate this guy every day now. It's fun.


I was wondering what this was doing in my activity feed, because I did not recognize it. What do you mean you get to debate this guy every day?

I am a member of an industry only network where he is also a member.   Daily debates ensue.    It's kinda funny to hear guys from Blizzard  and otehr developers/publishers pretty much call him an idiot.

His current direction isn't just anti-Nintendo but anti-console/portable console.  


Yeah...  I remember when he'd post here.

it's not a good sign when an industry analyst gets into an arguement with random forum goers and the analyst is the one without any numbers or a comprable situation to back up his position.

Indeed.  But what's funny now is he's getting hit by game designers, QA, software support analysts, research analysts, senior programmers, company owners, CEO's, network EIC's......

And I kid you not, that's all just from today.


Nice to know, even the pros have to deal with fanboys.



Honestly, it is okay for analysts to be wrong but Bruceongames and (to a lesser extent) Pachter's big mistake is they never re-evaluate their internal model in the face of overwhelming contradictory evidence. It would be one thing if their analysis was expectations of performance in the long run (what will the industry will look like 5 to 10 years from now) because you can claim that current sales performance doesn't matter towards long term sales performance; but both these analysts were often making short term predictions (6 to 18 months away) while ignoring current sales figures.

To use a parallel situation ... I have doubts about how strong Apple will be 5 to 10 years from now, and I think that Apple stock may well be at or near its peak, but it would be moronic to assume that Apple phones and tablets will not be the dominant seller at Christmas.