By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General Discussion - Mafia Round 36 - Suikoden II

NoCtiS_NoX on 13 December 2011
theprof00 said:
NoCtiS_NoX said:


This is my first post on day 3. Just finish reading  the 100 new posts.  Actually, I was about to post and then I refresh my other tab and I saw 2 more posts then I saw you asking questions to me. I think I need to answer you first. Anyway I am going to post it aswell.

As for your question the about night, the normal routine for us. NiV.

This time I voted for spurge. There's a thing that bug me about his question on moreno and the way he respond to Moreno after he answered maybe it's just me being a paranoid. 

As for FF all I can think of is maybe it has anything to do with your claim. I have read Moreno post. He's trying to link you and FF.  

why did you vote for spurge when it was almost concensus to vote for me?


Consensus? What do you mean by that?  Are you talking about Wonk's and Linkz's accusations to you? As far as I know we still haven't reached a consensus  for a NiV on you. 



Around the Network
Wonktonodi on 13 December 2011
NoCtiS_NoX said:
theprof00 said:
NoCtiS_NoX said:


This is my first post on day 3. Just finish reading  the 100 new posts.  Actually, I was about to post and then I refresh my other tab and I saw 2 more posts then I saw you asking questions to me. I think I need to answer you first. Anyway I am going to post it aswell.

As for your question the about night, the normal routine for us. NiV.

This time I voted for spurge. There's a thing that bug me about his question on moreno and the way he respond to Moreno after he answered maybe it's just me being a paranoid. 

As for FF all I can think of is maybe it has anything to do with your claim. I have read Moreno post. He's trying to link you and FF.  

why did you vote for spurge when it was almost concensus to vote for me?


Consensus? What do you mean by that?  Are you talking about Wonk's and Linkz's accusations to you? As far as I know we still haven't reached a consensus  for a NiV on you. 


consider a few things. 6 people had him listed in there top 3 yesterday, including you with him in your top 2. He survived a lynch at the last minute because of a claim.

I think you are missing something with that last sentence. The investigator is dead there probably won't be any more NIV.



Wonktonodi on 13 December 2011
spurgeonryan said:
NoCtiS_NoX said:
theprof00 said:
NoCtiS_NoX said:


This is my first post on day 3. Just finish reading  the 100 new posts.  Actually, I was about to post and then I refresh my other tab and I saw 2 more posts then I saw you asking questions to me. I think I need to answer you first. Anyway I am going to post it aswell.

As for your question the about night, the normal routine for us. NiV.

This time I voted for spurge. There's a thing that bug me about his question on moreno and the way he respond to Moreno after he answered maybe it's just me being a paranoid. 

As for FF all I can think of is maybe it has anything to do with your claim. I have read Moreno post. He's trying to link you and FF.  

why did you vote for spurge when it was almost concensus to vote for me?


Consensus? What do you mean by that?  Are you talking about Wonk's and Linkz's accusations to you? As far as I know we still haven't reached a consensus  for a NiV on you. 


Well I thought more people were going to do it so I voted so that we would not just waste our time again. I guess there were only three votes for him then.


Why do you come to that conclusion?



Wonktonodi on 13 December 2011
spurgeonryan said:
Wonktonodi said:
spurgeonryan said:


Well I thought more people were going to do it so I voted so that we would not just waste our time again. I guess there were only three votes for him then.


Why do you come to that conclusion?


Well it says wonk and link, and I did it. There is 3. But prof said FF went to investigate him or someone said that so I guess that is 4.

what it?

no one today has come forward with their votes besides noc with good reason he investigator is dead so it doesn't really matter anymore. I am just curious how you could conclude based on 1 person sharing his vote that prof would have only had 3.



theprof00 on 13 December 2011
Wonktonodi said:
spurgeonryan said:
Wonktonodi said:
spurgeonryan said:


Well I thought more people were going to do it so I voted so that we would not just waste our time again. I guess there were only three votes for him then.


Why do you come to that conclusion?


Well it says wonk and link, and I did it. There is 3. But prof said FF went to investigate him or someone said that so I guess that is 4.

what it?

no one today has come forward with their votes besides noc with good reason he investigator is dead so it doesn't really matter anymore. I am just curious how you could conclude based on 1 person sharing his vote that prof would have only had 3.

I'm also very interested in this.



Around the Network
theprof00 on 13 December 2011
spurgeonryan said:
Wonktonodi said:
spurgeonryan said:
Wonktonodi said:
spurgeonryan said:


Well I thought more people were going to do it so I voted so that we would not just waste our time again. I guess there were only three votes for him then.


Why do you come to that conclusion?


Well it says wonk and link, and I did it. There is 3. But prof said FF went to investigate him or someone said that so I guess that is 4.

what it?

no one today has come forward with their votes besides noc with good reason he investigator is dead so it doesn't really matter anymore. I am just curious how you could conclude based on 1 person sharing his vote that prof would have only had 3.


Missunderstanding...

 

I thought we were still talking about last nights votes.

You seem to be talking about todays votes for something.

I'm pretty sure we ARE talking about the last night's NIV votes.

Where does it say 3?



Wonktonodi on 13 December 2011
spurgeonryan said:
Wonktonodi said:
spurgeonryan said:
Wonktonodi said:
spurgeonryan said:


Well I thought more people were going to do it so I voted so that we would not just waste our time again. I guess there were only three votes for him then.


Why do you come to that conclusion?


Well it says wonk and link, and I did it. There is 3. But prof said FF went to investigate him or someone said that so I guess that is 4.

what it?

no one today has come forward with their votes besides noc with good reason he investigator is dead so it doesn't really matter anymore. I am just curious how you could conclude based on 1 person sharing his vote that prof would have only had 3.


Missunderstanding...

 

I thought we were still talking about last nights votes.

You seem to be talking about todays votes for something.


we are talking about last nights votes. You somehow concluded that there were 3 for prof last night based on one person sharing his. I want to know how you came to that conclusion.



theprof00 on 13 December 2011

So where did you get that wonk and linkz voted for me in niv.
i presumed that i was investigated by ff, i never said he voted for me to be investigated.
How do you know that wonk and linkz did.
Fyi i did vote for myself.



Wonktonodi on 13 December 2011
spurgeonryan said:
What are you guys talking about? Didn't some one else just say it above my recent convo?

If not then never mind it was you and I who voted for you.

 

I am asking why you say something.  If you can't even explain why you yourself say something it is really quite sad.  I don't have a scum feel from you though just a very very confused townie who really doesn't understand the game.



theprof00 on 13 December 2011

That wasn't surprising to be honest.
Are you a day vigilante as well?
How many shots did you have?