By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General Discussion - Mafia Round 36 - Suikoden II

Linkzmax said:
Vetteman94 said:
Linkzmax said:
Vetteman94 said:
Take your votes off me, one of you wouldn't like the end result.

I do find it quite ridiculous that the game has only been back on for 4 hours and yet I am being cried at for lack of participation. Seriously 4 hours?

Overreact much?

I know day two included most of the weekend, but you seriously consider 2 posts stellar participation?

WTF?

I am refering to people complaining that I havent been in here since the game has been back on.  For a whopping four hours.  I know I didnt participate much the previous day, I dont know where you get that I thought it was "stellar participation".     Overreact much?

There are a whopping 2 votes on you, and they are from the people you probably most have to fear hastily hammering.(prof would be a third :P wuv ewe)

Nobody has been complaining that you haven't been in here since day. See anyone crying for Noctis's lynch? The complaint is you've been quite absent in general. Your defense is that day's only been up for 4 hours, but your lack of participation was 2 posts in the entirety of day two. The 8 posts from day one(which I'd say is a lot for you relative to the overall activity) are not as memorable to some.

Well those 2 votes are half of what is needed to lynch. So it could end quickly,  not for me,  but the day would end quickly.

And thats fine and I accept that.  I know I have a low amount of posts, Its more of a choice thing than an availability thing.



Around the Network
Linkzmax said:
And I didn't even mention "one of you wouldn't like the end result."

Vette, how many mafia do you think are left?


2,  which is the other reason why I dont like that I have 2 votes on me,  since I only 2 more are needed for a lynch.



Noc looks like a good candidate.
i went back and looked at his posts and in the one about his suspect nearly all of them are people i would say are town ( except now with vettes weird posts making me rethink him.)
Please continue on vette, i am by no means trying to shift focus.
Vote noc



8 alive means 5 are needed for lynch.



Linkzmax said:
8 alive means 5 are needed for lynch.


Why the hell do you have a confirmed character name in the OP? Shouldnt that only be there for dead people



Around the Network
theprof00 said:
Noc looks like a good candidate.
i went back and looked at his posts and in the one about his suspect nearly all of them are people i would say are town ( except now with vettes weird posts making me rethink him.)
Please continue on vette, i am by no means trying to shift focus.
Vote noc

Come on,  you didnt think you were the only one allowed to have weird posts?

But my "weird "comments are there for good reason.



  l-4 l-3 l-2 l-1 lynch
noctis prof        
vette spurge radish      

vette: spurge, radish
noctis: prof

With 8 players 5 votes are required to lynch



Vetteman94 said:
Linkzmax said:
8 alive means 5 are needed for lynch.


Why the hell do you have a confirmed character name in the OP? Shouldnt that only be there for dead people

So you not only choose not to post, but not to read?



Linkzmax said:
Vetteman94 said:
Linkzmax said:
8 alive means 5 are needed for lynch.


Why the hell do you have a confirmed character name in the OP? Shouldnt that only be there for dead people

So you not only choose not to post, but not to read?

OK,  so instead of simply answering the question you decide to post this stupid question.

Fine I will assume it had something to do with the random visitation you recieved and for some reason the mod felt it was ok to confirm your name.  

Anything else you got for me?



Vetteman94 said:

Well those 2 votes are half of what is needed to lynch. So it could end quickly,  not for me,  but the day would end quickly.

So you're saying you wouldn't be lynched and someone else would die in your place?

Well given your role,(and I'm not saying it has to be what I'm guessing) what do you make of prof's claim?