By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General Discussion - Mafia Round 36 - Suikoden II

theprof00 said:
Linkzmax said:
prof, did you protect your sibling night one or vice-versa?

I protected my sibling.

Then I'd wager the no kill night one was either an elaborate plan by you and your "sibling" or he was targeted due to his lack of anything except defending you day one. The latter is more likely especially given you'd be a 3-man team WITH a day kill choosing simply not to kill. The third option is he had his buddies choose no kill to confirm himself town in your eyes, still don't find that probable given a day kill.



Around the Network

prof, why so disbelieving of my day-time ability? http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4333664



theprof00 said:
Linkzmax said:
theprof00 said:
Linkzmax said:
Anyway, prof you can blame yourself for constantly pushing me day two to come at you. And you can excuse me for not trusting your claim at just face value. The way I see it, confirmation would make 4 people I wouldn't even consider lynching today. And with my reads on radish and spurge it would be either Noctis or Vette to hang.

No, it's more like, you tried to kill me, giving no reasoning. Then gave very weak reasoning, and have continued your weak reasoning ever since I told you to bring it.

It's just a poor game that most people here are noobs, or play like noobs and buy into your horseshit. :D

Get over it dude.

And yeah, I'm not going to waste my time writing a lengthy post that nobody is going to read fully. Except maybe for you, but if I'm going that far then your rebuttal isn't really going to make a difference to me.

Get over what? Your scummy attempts to kill me disguised as responding to my goading? What's there to get over?

stop tunneling :P



Wonktonodi said:
theprof00 said:
Linkzmax said:
theprof00 said:
Linkzmax said:
Anyway, prof you can blame yourself for constantly pushing me day two to come at you. And you can excuse me for not trusting your claim at just face value. The way I see it, confirmation would make 4 people I wouldn't even consider lynching today. And with my reads on radish and spurge it would be either Noctis or Vette to hang.

No, it's more like, you tried to kill me, giving no reasoning. Then gave very weak reasoning, and have continued your weak reasoning ever since I told you to bring it.

It's just a poor game that most people here are noobs, or play like noobs and buy into your horseshit. :D

Get over it dude.

And yeah, I'm not going to waste my time writing a lengthy post that nobody is going to read fully. Except maybe for you, but if I'm going that far then your rebuttal isn't really going to make a difference to me.

Get over what? Your scummy attempts to kill me disguised as responding to my goading? What's there to get over?

stop tunneling :P


Tell him that. We start the day and it's all OOoOOH Prrooofoff how I LLOOOOOve you, Let's TAaAlKKkK BabBbYY I NEeEeEd To TAAAAAlAaaALK about ProOoOoOFFF. OoOoOH YeeAeaAH!1!1!



Linkzmax said:
prof, why so disbelieving of my day-time ability? http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4333664

It's fairly explained right there. Which you later explain is actually basically a friendly neighbor or something.

Maybe this is also what you're digging for, but to extrapolate, I found it hard to believe that there'd be a pair of siblings AND another type of confirming role along with a cop. Your Friendly neighbor reasoning just didn't and doesn't feel right with me and sibling in the game.



Around the Network
Linkzmax said:
theprof00 said:
Linkzmax said:
prof, did you protect your sibling night one or vice-versa?

I protected my sibling.

Then I'd wager the no kill night one was either an elaborate plan by you and your "sibling" or he was targeted due to his lack of anything except defending you day one. The latter is more likely especially given you'd be a 3-man team WITH a day kill choosing simply not to kill. The third option is he had his buddies choose no kill to confirm himself town in your eyes, still don't find that probable given a day kill.

Care to explain the bolded?



theprof00 said:
Linkzmax said:
prof, did you protect your sibling night one or vice-versa?

I protected my sibling.


so with no kill night 1 and you protecting your sibling. You concluded scum didn't target him. While only scum and the mod would know that.

Then last night you ask for the doc to protect you yet you had him protect you as well?

While it is possible scum do not know who your sibling is, since ff wasn't it. They very well could know who he is, now if you would please let the town know so we can more on it would really be appreciated.



FF recap:
first Baal was not scanned.
NIVed Wonk, assuming this is true then he would also have gone with him in the event of a tie. It's weird though that he says he thinks spurge was investigated.
not spurge Unless FF was trying to get the investigation "doubled" up, this does rule out spurge.
as prof pointed out says Wonk lynch wouldn't happen.

So Wonk's word is gospel. There's room for error in his opinions, but no room to distrust any of them.



theprof00 said:
Linkzmax said:
prof, why so disbelieving of my day-time ability? http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4333664

It's fairly explained right there. Which you later explain is actually basically a friendly neighbor or something.

Maybe this is also what you're digging for, but to extrapolate, I found it hard to believe that there'd be a pair of siblings AND another type of confirming role along with a cop. Your Friendly neighbor reasoning just didn't and doesn't feel right with me and sibling in the game.

No no no, I'm not talking about disbelieving a self-watcher. You made a big stink about it being daytime too, when you've got a daytime ability yourself.



Especially with the godfather down, we can assume that there aren't any other potential roles that may come up as innocent even if they are guilty.



Money can't buy happiness. Just video games, which make me happy.