Or a more lengthy explanation of his question: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4336172

When you bold a vote on a separate line it counts as your vote to lynch, as I've been telling you.

Heck even if it wasn't bolded, just by having it on a line by itself means it's a lynch vote. If you're talking about who you want to investigate, say it just like that or call it a NIV as the rest of us have been doing.

So you did not want to vote yet or is this a misunderstanding? Should I keep your vote for now? Are you going to change it either way?

Id rather flipflop on some thant have tunnelvision.
my town reads used to be baal, radish, and mg.
but as i went back i eliminated three who might have been cleared too qyickly.
Wobk well i dont know he was scanned for sure. However his posts makr me lean more town with him since our interactionbecause hes always like this as town. You, sorry man youre illoigical. Thats a good enough reason for me.
The otgers, yes process of elimination.
vette could have easily not extended. So fucking easily and gotten away with it. To waste a free lynch to make tourself look town eveb with a fucking COP in the game able to ruin all thay effort doesnt make sense.ff seems town . He usually exposes himself as being "unsure" a lot more as mafia. Surely he could be pretending but i dont think so. Furthermore his question isabout nivs ovetlapping was a very fruitful one.had ge simply said that they wont overlao itd be different, but he asked for confirmation.

My mafia recruiting theory was flailing? It was lookong at the possibilities.
Look linkz i did it as mafia that game against vette. I claimed a similar role to yours. I am of the mibdset that such manuevering is both possible and smart.
dont think you can prove your wifom simply because i pointed out the superficiality of wonks accusation witg an example of how i play. You are overthinking and he is undertginking.
Taking someone off my list either accidebtally or purposely is not scummy behavior. Plain and simple.
my rxample was the simplest way to prove rhe superficiality of his accusation.
Yours is NOT a simple explanation but avery complicated explanation.

OK there's not a heck of a lot of time so I'm going to do something unconventional and post "in the dark" i.e. before reading completely up to date.

Unvote prof

It's a pretty audacious claim if false, which in no way means it's true. But FOR TODAY, I definitely think lynching him is too great a risk. (BTW Stefl, if it's true, I think that's a really neat role you made, nice blend of lovers/masons.)

As a result, I don't have anyone who is a huge suspect right now, so I want to lynch a lurker. Noctis is posting, so that pretty much means moreno, I think.

Vote morenoingrato.

Prof is the obvious NIV, my alternate is probably Noctis because his participation could be due to a prod by scummates.

You believe I have to be a broken mafia role instead of a confirmable town role, yet I'm the illogical one.
You lean town with Wonk and you have your vote on him, yet I'm the illogical one.
You tell me I can't use metagaming and WIFOM to explain a question you ask that is only answerable by metagaming and WIFOM, yet I'm the illogical one.

"I went into this game looking for suspects. As it turned out ive felt really good about 3 people." I assume Vette and FF are the first two, so who is the 3rd? Or are you telling me you meant Baal, radish, and mg?

I've been lovers/siblings 3 times, including last round.... If it's true it's not something Stefl created.

Wow thanks for painting a target on my back. 

I am not his sibling and I have no evidence whatsoever to indicate for or against that such roles exist let alone that prof is one. 

And seriously, I've been trying to lynch him for the longest of anyone, so moreno your suspicion that I'm the sibling is really weird unless you think I've been doing it just to try to distance us. 

Or you could just not be paying attention to the thread, except to bandwagon a likely lynch.  Guess which one I suspect.