By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General Discussion - Mafia Round 36 - Suikoden II

Looking through people's arguments as to why Prof should be lynched, they don't make much sense to me- so what if he changed his lynch vote? Everyone changes their minds as more evidence comes to light- it'd be far more suspicious if he didn't. The only thing that I find strange about him is the very large size of his suspicion list; most of which he hasn't really expanded on, just seemingly put them on there for the sake of it



Click this button, you know you want to!  [Subscribe]

Watch me on YouTube!

http://www.youtube.com/user/TheRadishBros

~~~~ Mario Kart 8 drove far past my expectations! Never again will I doubt the wheels of a Monster Franchise! :0 ~~~~

Around the Network

Yes it does make sense silly.
The mafia have no idea who my partner is. Had i made my sibling one of my trusted, theyd only have to pick between two people. Instead, they have to pick through at least three.
Im not skipping wonk. His accusations are really baseless but he cant even see his own accusations for what theytre worth. Hes simply convinced..and its a mistake.
Also what eould you even know about his accusations? Youve obviously not even been following the thread since you think vette was my only trusted, and youve basically just parroted what wonk said with "people just pop in and out off your list".
Yet even without knowing half the details, youre willing to lynch me after my claim.
Youre simply convinced by wonks accusations arent you. Thats a tight defense for when i flip. Blame wonk, eh?come to think of it, you gahavent posted in the town quicktopic at all have you? Too busy talking on the mafia one?
Youre scum arent you moreno?



@radish
I went into this game looking for suspects. As it turned out ive felt really good about 3 people. Adding that to my teammate there are four people i trust. That is a far better starting point than feeling that others are scum.
Of course during the arguing ive moved a trusted down to on the fence as i also did with you because people questioned my list. And made me feel like i was missing something.
Everyone on my suspect list, besides my teammate are well worth going after.even if i dont reallu have anything on them, its hard to get dirt on lurkers and noobs. Thats why i trust more on my trusted list and why ny suspect list keeps changing.



prof, assume for a moment that I am town, and I will ask you as if you are town. Do you think mafia were bright enough to figure out who targeted me and that's why mg died? You don't think they've figured out who you're sibling is? It's already narrowed down to a single individual.

I don't believe the claim though. You should not think that there's 3 mafia AND that they have some kind of strong power if two townies can die at once. You are preying on town's fears of not just a mislynch, but a double mislynch.



Youre right.
I dont believe there is three.
Had i said i believed there were two id be giving away more info avout muself and why would i do that?
No i dont think they were bright enough unless several of the mafia themselves were online and ut was really easy to narrow down.
My first inclination is that its a rolecop.
Now assuming youre town thinking im mafia.
So i killed mg and used it to nake you look so guilty that in the thread i took suspicion OFF ofyou.
That makes sense how?
Again, i frame you and then take suspicion OFF of you.
Real lack of logic this game linkz.



Around the Network

I thought two was very possible even without thinking there could be siblings. 11 players means 2, 2+1, or 3 are all feasible.

It would be EXACTLY like you as mafia to frame me and then voice you are less suspicious of me in thread, and you know it. Especially with you being a focal point of many's distrust already.



Many?
Dont make me laugh.
there are you and wonk, moreno OBVIOUSLY parroting and not following the thread ff simply because he always diatrusts me. There are just as many thinking that all the suspicions are warrantless.
and thats what i WOULD do as mafia? Thats metagaming and wifom linkz. Not evidence either for or against.

Oh so you didnt take my mafia recruiter theory as putting that out there? That there might be two looking for obe?



Your biggest suspects have been:
Radish, no reason beyond process of elimination.
Spurg, flip-flopped so often that it's laughable.
Wonk, either cop scanned or cop knows he wasn't actually scanned and thus he should have someone besides you pointing a finger.
Me, and you talk about a lack of logic.

Your staunchest town reads:
Vette, because there's no way he'd save you to make himself look clean to everyone in the event you do actually flip town, right?
FF, because there's no way that mafia would try to swing the vote back to a previously scanned person so it's a waste, right?
3rd guy, who?



theprof00 said:
Many?
Dont make me laugh.
there are you and wonk, moreno OBVIOUSLY parroting and not following the thread ff simply because he always diatrusts me. There are just as many thinking that all the suspicions are warrantless.
and thats what i WOULD do as mafia? Thats metagaming and wifom linkz. Not evidence either for or against.

Oh so you didnt take my mafia recruiter theory as putting that out there? That there might be two looking for obe?

"How bad of a mafia would I be if a scum buddy did something scummy and I suddently removed him from my list? You're thinking too superficially. That's like scum never voting for scum. DUDE LAST GAME I LYNCHED AND WENT AFTER TWO OF MY OWN. Does that sound like what happened here? Christ man."

No, your mafia recruiter theory was flailing to have me discredited. A mafia recruiter is even stronger than 3 in the first place.



spurgeonryan said:

Sure I will answer, because I do not remember being asked. Lots of crap went on last night. What is it again?

I think he means http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4335999

"1st of @spurge why the sudden vote for me when linkz voted for you? I think I owe an explanation at that sudden vote. "