Your accusations are so fucking bogus both of you.
I've answered all your questions. the best linkz has is that I missed someone. Fucking bullshit. Terrible detectives, I swear.
Your accusations are so fucking bogus both of you.
I've answered all your questions. the best linkz has is that I missed someone. Fucking bullshit. Terrible detectives, I swear.
you didn't comment on your list of ever changing and not always consistent list of suspects yet. However I shall continue.
theprof00 said: BECAUSE PEOPLE CHANGE THEIR MINDS YOU SAP |
not an answer
YOU WHO CAN'T EVEN GIVE ME A SOLID REASON WHY YOU DEFENDED LINKZ.
Your whole argument in fact is in avoidance of my first question of why you provided linkz with an excuse.
You first avoided that question by asking ME why I defended someone else, without answering my question.
You have not deterred from that course. All you do is question who I suspect. You have no suspects other than me. In fact you continue on me now, even after my claim.
Wonktonodi said:
|
Yes it is.
I changed my mind on suspects given what people were saying, reviewing, rereading. NOT LIKE I'D EXPECT YOU TO UNDERSTAND HOW CHANGE OF MIND HAPPENS YOU BLOCKHEAD.
Keep coming, wonk. Your're doing FABULOUS.
to speak further why did your mind change when one of them had not posted and another did something scummy? Them going off your liest with no exlpanation makes no sence.
All those list seem more like fishing to see if anyone will join you in going after the people on the list.
You say you dislike people saying you should trust someone. Yet when we show you evidence from the game you are a skeptic. When all we have is you saying you are town so vette must be as well to the point you just vote with him.
Wonktonodi said:
2 http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4329740 you add radish to the list in the next post Followed imediatly by a vote for RAdish 3. http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4329742 4. http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4329769 your post where you say the speed of my vote will determine how you view me the rest of the game. Had I seen the post I would have linked you to the post that answered your questions 12 hours before that. 5. http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4329816 Now you finally have "opened up your suspects list" to include me. 6. http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4330112 Suddenly your "5" although with me would be 6 lost moren and spurge. no questioning of them no grilling of them. Just gone. In fact moreno posted nothing between these and Spurge revenge voted on radish. 7. http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4329996 spurges posts around the revenge vote and vette calling him out on it. 8. http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4330334 After links asks prof who he meant as the 5th or if prof meant 4 prof says he meant 4and in fact now saying spurge "seems genuine" and somehow the 4 changes noc is out and moreno is back in. 9. http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4330337 prof explains why the list was off because radish wasn't on it when radish has been on all but the first 10. http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4331012 for suspecting radish you are acting very stange towards him like you somehow think this will make him trust you. and that is all day 1
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4330454 saving this one for latter
|
1. staring point. OK
2. Yup, because he is a good possibility.
3. It's day one. Nothing wrong with voting for suspects. There's very little evidence available, you take what you can get. I had cleared people. He wasn't one of them. therefore he's a suspect.
4. Ok I already acknowledged not seeing it before.
5. Ok? At that point, I thought you left on purpose. Logical.
6. OK I see how that happened, but he reappears in a later list. So what?
7. Umm don't see what your point is.
8. Yep, spurge seems genuine based on the noob play I was literally JUST talking about a minute ago. I see how leaving out noc is weird but that was a phone error. Notice the spanish thing on the n and your name being wonfence. I couldn't go back and check since my phone is hard to use on vgc, and noc slipped under my attention.
9. Yes I was referring to the first. It felt like he had been off it for longer, but I guess not. During the day that I wrote this, I was getting confused by the rhetoric and nonsense, and thought, I felt much more confidentl about the players on early day 1 during my attack on spurge. So I went back, and was like, yep I'm right to trust these players...except radish, that one felt right at the time, but not so much anymore. Hence the list changing. SEE HOW THAT WORKS?
10. What? I didn't want radish to think I was blindly going to lynch him for no reason. WTF are you snorting, wonk? Must be shards of glass.
Yep. Big News. Cover page stuff wonk, good sluething work.
theprof00 said: YOU WHO CAN'T EVEN GIVE ME A SOLID REASON WHY YOU DEFENDED LINKZ. Your whole argument in fact is in avoidance of my first question of why you provided linkz with an excuse. You first avoided that question by asking ME why I defended someone else, without answering my question. You have not deterred from that course. All you do is question who I suspect. You have no suspects other than me. In fact you continue on me now, even after my claim. |
Go back and brng up the exact conversation, show me some post.
IIRC you came after me for not questioning link and his vote for you and I told you why I wan't questioning him. Since you weren't lynched so no flip there was no need to go into linkz vote. Also had linkz not been the first to vote time extention I would have looked at him differently, since he played it how I would have played it why would I question him fist. From my perspective you could have been saved by a fellow scum. Either Vette at that point of FF when he had unvoted before. If you had flipped town then maybe I would have looked more into linkz.
Also although you very well could have missed it, you were nearly lynched day one and didn't bother to claim then.