In case you don't understand the language linkz, an orgy of evidence would mean that you're being framed.

Roughly 13 hours. In case you've forgotten and missed it. You already have a lynch vote placed on Noctis. I ask that you unvote.

Mafia has already attacked today, hence MG's death. If it were a dayvig then there would have been a claim already.

Yes, but "looks incredibly bad" and "on the fence with" do not imply that you actually think such is the case.

A dayvig going after mg just doesn't make sense.
Like I said in a previous post, to pick him out implies maybe 3 things.
1) That it's you, linkz
2) That mafia were able to decipher who the role was based on who was online, and subsequent posts (like me thinking the role was possibly mafia, I probably wasn't the chef) This would require some really intelligent thinking and a bit of luck on top of it.
3) Mafia somehow already knew his role, implying they have either a role cop, or a tracker and tracked him.

I'd say that it's most likely that there is a role cop, or something similar. Killing him specifically after your interaction with him, it's too lucky to be a shot in the dark.

But possible frame job does move you from suspect to on the fence. Derp.

But wait! You noted yourself who was online and left MG off the list... Hmmmm

You have a list one moment latter you add someone. When I went offline while you asked a question you suddenly add me. Even though I had answere the question 12 hours before. What question did spurge answer that was good enough to remove him from your suspects yet you didn't even bother unvoting him at the time?

You constantly say I'm town I'm town like that is somehow evidence.

You miss points people make. Like when I have listed people I find suspicious.

You come up with crazy theories for how linkz should be scum by his claim yet ignore the more likely possibilities. Plus you flipped what you were even complaining about.

You throw crazy gambits that make it hard to follow where you stand on someone.

You have focused more on the people who are more cleared then on looking into those that have not been.

So how namy suspects do you have at the moment? is it 4? Is it 5 is is 6?

should we count people you are on the fence about as people you suspect?

Should I quote all your posts on suspects to show how crazy they are?

Why is it ok for you to trust other players and just vote how they vote no reasons of your own while it's no ok for linkz and I to even agree on anything?

Your vote: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4334195

Votals confirming your vote: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4335746

Like I said, you already have a vote on Noctis. I'm not asking you to follow me and vote anyone, but Noctis is unlikely to be lynched at the moment. A fragmented town is going to result in no lynch again, and thus they should be focused.

Going back to this cus I've had it saved in another tab(not sure why)

What are you talking about? Nobody had even mentioned MG other than you're wavering from town to "concerned."

How is Wonk still in your suspect list? You admit that it's unlikely people lied about their NIVs and so Wonk was probably copped and came up innocent.

Objection! I simply went and looked at the post times, and at the time of that post, all the ones centering around that said 1 day ago, and mgs subsequent post said 23 hours, so I concluded he was not actually on. I didn't have an exact record, and nocs was shortly after but no post before, so I wasn't sure if he just showed up!

All those people I listed were guaranteed in the thick of it. I couldn't prove mg or noc, but noc seemed like he might've been lurking. So sorry big guy!