theprof00 said: Back when you were claiming to be cop you told FF he had no vote because he was scum. Although it could be you making a mistake as town. I see it more likely to be you trying to get the town to think that we shouldn't discuss who we want investigated. Another reason was you had only one more vote than other players. I wanted there to be a more clear lead so I would take 2 vote/unvotes to make a tie. And another was to see if anyone would bandwagon after my vote. Although I got a different result. FF unvoting you in a hurry. I see, sorry about that then. Let me respond to those: 1) How does the first one make sense? I'm trying to get town to not discuss by saying that FF didn't get a vote because he's mafia? 2) You wanted me to have more of a clear lead. How is that a reason for voting? That's like saying "why did you want X voted" - "because I wanted him lynched". That's not reasoning, that' s a goal. 3) You wanted to see if anyone would bandwagon. Typically, people use this reasoning in order to draw out scum votes, not to lynch the person. Yet you want me lynched? This comes off as hypocritical. Secondly, Linkz voted for me, and you haven't said anything at all about that. |
1.If you are mafia you would prefer the town to not discuss who to be investigated. Since that would give your team more control.
2. Having a clear lead is not the same as wanting YOUR lynch. I would get people to say if they do not want your lynch or get others to talk up those they voted for. It's not like you were out trying to get people to vote the way you did.
3. Yes it is often used to draw out scum votes. I was highly considering unvoting you after that didn't work but if I did that then I might as well have not voted the time extension and voted no lynch like Radish. I want a lynch today over a no lynch. As for linkz vote although he didn't give much reason for it, he really doesn't need any reason other than wanting there to be a lynch today over a no lynch.