By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Wii U vs PS4 vs Xbox One FULL SPECS (January 24, 2014)

Chark on 21 January 2013

So you think PS4 might still have an 8 core? What's the weight behind the 4 core CPU in some of the rumors.



Before the PS3 everyone was nice to me :(

Around the Network
superchunk on 21 January 2013
Chark said:
So you think PS4 might still have an 8 core? What's the weight behind the 4 core CPU in some of the rumors.

The latest have stated 8core for both systems. Its the memory, GPU, and secret sauce that is separating them AFAIK.



Chark on 21 January 2013
superchunk said:
Chark said:
So you think PS4 might still have an 8 core? What's the weight behind the 4 core CPU in some of the rumors.

The latest have stated 8core for both systems. Its the memory, GPU, and secret sauce that is separating them AFAIK.


It is hard to tell what is current, especially when the latest ones are sometimes the older ones  -_-



Before the PS3 everyone was nice to me :(

D-Joe on 21 January 2013

None of any "developers" said these spec are correct

Like SATA 2.0 huh,joke of the year



http://zh-tw.justin.tv/johndoe1899

superchunk on 21 January 2013
D-Joe said:

None of any "developers" said these spec are correct

Like SATA 2.0 huh,joke of the year

In the respective threads on GAF for the latest ps4 and neXtBox rumors, multiple devs said they are largely accurate. Are there parts that are still likely wrong? of course. but yeah... believe what you will.

BTW, why wouldn't it use a SATA connection?



Around the Network
drkohler on 21 January 2013
BlueFalcon said:

Thanks! 

Based on these cost breakdowns, I am pretty disappointed if Xbox 720 will only end up with an HD7770Ghz GPU.

I haven't been able to find the latest generational cost for HD7000/GTX600 series but I'll link it if I do. 

Note that this list is only valid once the manufacturing lines are optimised (maximum yields). Initial prices for cpus/gpus are very considerably higher, so there is a reason why the next console parts are not as new as you wish them to be.



D-Joe on 21 January 2013
superchunk said:
D-Joe said:

None of any "developers" said these spec are correct

Like SATA 2.0 huh,joke of the year

In the respective threads on GAF for the latest ps4 and neXtBox rumors, multiple devs said they are largely accurate. Are there parts that are still likely wrong? of course. but yeah... believe what you will.

BTW, why wouldn't it use a SATA connection?

Most of them just claiming they're devs,and yes,wrong

neogaf->outside->neogaf,that's how it come from,but you don't need to change it since i can't give you any source either,just keep what you wrote

But

SATA 3 already come out over 3 years,and even every rumored spec are right,that still means it can support SATA 3

2.0?if Durango use SATA 2.0,whatever GPU/CPU/RAM come with,we can throw it to trash can already



http://zh-tw.justin.tv/johndoe1899

HoloDust on 21 January 2013
superchunk said:
More tweaking of info.... fill free to assist me with specific info and especially ranking/comparison info now that parts are starting to become clearer.

 

  Approximate GPU Performance Config VP Rating vs 360
Xbox 360 2 x HD2600XT * 0.625 240:16:8 (VLIW5) 14.6 1.0
WiiU (Redwood LE@550MHz) HD5550(DDR3) 320:16:8 (VLIW5) 21.8 1.5
WiiU (Redwood@550MHz) HD5570(DDR3) * 0.85 400:20:8 (VLIW5) 25.5 1.7
WiiU (Turks@550MHz) HD6570(DDR3) * 0.85 480:24:8 (VLIW5) 28.9 2.0
Xbox 720 (Rumoured) HD7770GHz 768:48:16 (GCN) 94 6.4
PS4 (Rumoured) HD7870 * 0.78 1152:72:32 (GCN) 135 9.2


ethomaz on 21 January 2013

D-Joe said:

Most of them just claiming they're devs,and yes,wrong

neogaf->outside->neogaf,that's how it come from,but you don't need to change it since i can't give you any source either,just keep what you wrote

But

SATA 3 already come out over 3 years,and even every rumored spec are right,that still means it can support SATA 3

2.0?if Durango use SATA 2.0,whatever GPU/CPU/RAM come with,we can throw it to trash can already

About the SATA... there is no HDD to use the 6Gbps (300MB/s)... even SSD lies to reach that transfer rate... SATA II provides 3Gbps (150MB/s)... it's more than sufficient to any single HDD in the market.

The only real use for SATA 3 is you mount a system with SSD in Raid... the two SSD are accessed at the same time so you need a lot of transfer rate.

For a console SATA 3 is useless... just more cost.



D-Joe on 21 January 2013
ethomaz said:

D-Joe said:

Most of them just claiming they're devs,and yes,wrong

neogaf->outside->neogaf,that's how it come from,but you don't need to change it since i can't give you any source either,just keep what you wrote

But

SATA 3 already come out over 3 years,and even every rumored spec are right,that still means it can support SATA 3

2.0?if Durango use SATA 2.0,whatever GPU/CPU/RAM come with,we can throw it to trash can already

About the SATA... there is no HDD to use the 6Gbps (300MB/s)... even SSD lies to reach that transfer rate... SATA II provides 3Gbps (150MB/s)... it's more than sufficient to any single HDD in the market.

The only real use for SATA 3 is you mount a system with SSD in Raid... the two SSD are accessed at the same time so you need a lot of transfer rate.

For a console SATA 3 is useless... just more cost.

More cost?in my country,even 1.5TB SATA 3,it's only 668$HKD(=around 86$US)

It's pretty simple,"useful" or not,they will provides SATA 3,and SATA 2 and SATA 3's price are almost same.



http://zh-tw.justin.tv/johndoe1899