OMG this is incredibly surprising news!
Paul said:
The big boy grew up and plays little big planet now. Do you take your sack boy doll to bed with you when your mommy turns out the lights? |
I play with A sack...wouldn't call it a doll :/
Areym said:
Oh my, you took the time to make a list for me. Oh gosh, I'm blushing now. I feel flattered. Wonderful, how marvelously wonderful. Hahaha. I'm a nintendo fan. Plain and simple. If you think otherwise, well so be it. I got nothing to prove here |

Menx64
3DS code: 1289-8222-7215
NNid: Menx064

Areym said:
Oh my, you took the time to make a list for me. Oh gosh, I'm blushing now. I feel flattered. Wonderful, how marvelously wonderful. Hahaha. I'm a nintendo fan. Plain and simple. If you think otherwise, well so be it. I got nothing to prove here |
Sorry but if Rol hadn't I would have. You obviously never were a "Nintendo fan" from the sounds of it you were just a gamer who owned a Nintendo console and moved on. That is not a fan say I buy Pirates Of the Caribean and think its alright then the sequel comes out and I'm not that interested 3 movies later I still don't like the series. I didn't mind the first film so I call myself a fan. No I am a consumer who purchased one of the movies not a fan.
Also your arguments were hugely flawed. Red Steel was I guess a decent quality game when it launched but it was definitly not excellent. MadWorld was a disaster the game was hopelessly repetitive and lacked any creativity it used gore and violence to try and sell itself. The game was a peice of shit it lacked depth and quality, using its mature rating and gore to try and sell to so called hardcore gamers. As for Conduit it too was a mediocre game, it was the best FPS on Wii at the time but it was nothing to write home about. None of these games deserved to sell more then they did, Conduit2 is probably the only one I think should have performed slightly better since I don't think Conduit one was really that horrible.
As for the Japanese titles, Rol is right you are only mentioning them because you know everyone whines and complains about them. But you probably don't know too much about them and you are obviously oblivious to the business decision and why it was made.
As for new IP your right Sony has created some good IP lately. But you lose me when you mention Resistence having played all three Resistence titles and being a huge FPS fan they were mediocre at best. The first one was the best and the later two just got worse with every installment.
Nintendo is not playing it safe either. While they rely heavily on the success of their existing IP they created around half a dozen new IP this generation. Yah some were casual but Nintendo has had no shortage of new IP. You seem to realize it is not in Nintendo's best interest to abandon its big successful IP in favor of new IP. Yet you argue they should, well that just doesn't make sense.
Nintendo is going to bring more new IP to the table. But they will not stop supporting their existing IP. One of Sony's biggest mistakes is allowing their IP to die. Sony should have made sure they held onto Spyro and Crash they should have ensured that Sony's internal studios didn't let any franchise selling more then a million or two copies die. It was poor business decisions by Sony that has lead to their current first party software collapse.
A Nintendo fan who is against Zelda and such is not a Nintendo fan as Rol said. Even if you didn't enjoy Zelda as much as everyone else you would not be against trying it. That right their screams hostile fanboy and judging from your post your a Sony fan who dislikes Nintendo!
-JC7
"In God We Trust - In Games We Play " - Joel Reimer
| TWRoO said: WipEout isn't the best example to use.... pretty sure it sold a lot more than the equivalent Nintendo game this generation. |
Yes, a game that exists will necessarily sell more than a game that doesn't exist, sadly

Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.
Areym said:
|
Think of it this way, rather. Sticking to consoles and going by generations as our measuring stick, Zelda has had 5 games (if we don't count Four Swords Adventures and do count Skyward Sword) in 3 generations, whereas Uncharted has had three games in one

Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.
Guys.
Uncharted, InFamous, Resistance, Ratchet... those are not Sony franchises. Not really. Yes, they're Sony-exclusive, but Sony has nothing to do with their creation if I remember right.
Mr Khan said:
Yes, a game that exists will necessarily sell more than a game that doesn't exist, sadly |
I had to be reminded of F-Zero today...