that's nothing, Gamerankings has it at 91.28. VERY pissed off about that. The game is every bit as good and better than Uncharted 2....yet it's getting a lot of bullshit reviews.

Bullshit.

how did B/A+ equate to 7.5???

A+ = 10
A = 9.5
A- = 9
B+ = 8.5
B = 8

WTF? really?

I totally called the 92, TOTALLY called it.

Guys, seriously: Is there any way we can get them ass holes to add OPM Australia?

Ancient Chinese secret, eh?  http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4264099

And once again.....: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4264256

You once were the teacher but now I am the master!

Just read my signature XD

I was very set on 92-93, but yeah for the bet, I took 93 ;)
(Bs haha xD)

For the last couple of pages I've been saying 92 though :> I know it doesnt count but YEYE! XD

I DO think there is a sliiight chance of 93 still. But them meta guys need to add OPM AU!!

Meta.

GRYOnline.pl 90 (never saw this site on Meta before)

6365 / 69 = 92.25 (rounded to 92).

OPM AU ;_;!! Come on..

Gamerankings can't be blamed for that, really; they're just presenting the mean average of reviews of registered publications.

I know, but the point is that there are people out there giving the game a mediocre score simply because it didn't wow us like uncharted 2 did, in spite of the fact that it's objectively better.  Better co op, better competitive multiplayer, and an equal or better campaign. I just don't like how people review games based on hype rather than actual quality. 

now 70 critics