By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Microsoft - Forza 4 Tech Analysis by Digital Foundry

Tagged games:

I love Turn 10's focus on achieving rock steady performance over having new features added without them being ready. I do wish they had made a bigger emphasis on bringing something new into Forza 4 though, because it doesn't feel like it has a killer feature over Forza 3. It's "just" upgraded many existing features, and though the upgrades are very comprehensive and make for a much improved game, it still makes it come off a bit conservative.



Around the Network
trasharmdsister12 said:
Rainbird said:
I love Turn 10's focus on achieving rock steady performance over having new features added without them being ready. I do wish they had made a bigger emphasis on bringing something new into Forza 4 though, because it doesn't feel like it has a killer feature over Forza 3. It's "just" upgraded many existing features, and though the upgrades are very comprehensive and make for a much improved game, it still makes it come off a bit conservative.

They did do Autovista (kinda the "killer" new feature) and a whole lot of Kinect integration (outside of the obvious driving using Kinect), as well as some neat new online modes (rivals, bowling, soccer, etc.) but I agree. I don't know what they could've done but I do get the same feeling that there seems to be some kind of hole.

*Awaits someone to jump on me for thinking something bad about Forza.... I'm going to be here a while*

I think Autovista is a symbol of what is missing in Forza 4. Turn 10 focused so much of their efforts on the graphics, that they didn't get to add anything really big to the racing experience, like night racing for example.

Thankfully, their new lighting allows them to do night racing more easily, so I think we'll see it in the next game (whether that will be on the 360 or 720 remains to be seen of course). Either way, after reviewers have been pointing out how similar Forza 4 is to Forza 3 in many ways, Turn 10 are sure to want to shake things up. They're usually pretty good at doing the right things with their next game.

My personal most wanted is a comprehensive tutorial. I can drive around for as much as I want, but I want to be taught to be a good driver. Teach me when I need to change gear and why, how to take a turn and why, etc.



mantlepiecek said:

Forza 4 didn't really win the head to head because there was no head to head. Digitalfoundry seems to think they are both as good as it gets and Polyphony seems to be the one that tries to introduce something new in racing sims. I am stating only this because for some (weird) reason you guys are picking on gt5 throughout the thread.

There's also a forza 3 vs forza 4 comparison, its a good article overall.


They did. They just refrained from committing. They did a side by side comparison. Gave us all the facts and figures and then said you decide. Either people choose to ignore the figures or not. Obviously the side by side favoured FM4 heavily in all recorded data they obtained.



selnor said:
mantlepiecek said:

Forza 4 didn't really win the head to head because there was no head to head. Digitalfoundry seems to think they are both as good as it gets and Polyphony seems to be the one that tries to introduce something new in racing sims. I am stating only this because for some (weird) reason you guys are picking on gt5 throughout the thread.

There's also a forza 3 vs forza 4 comparison, its a good article overall.


They did. They just refrained from committing. They did a side by side comparison. Gave us all the facts and figures and then said you decide. Either people choose to ignore the figures or not. Obviously the side by side favoured FM4 heavily in all recorded data they obtained.

Err...it didn't win. It does have better performance, but that doesn't mean GT5 has bad performance. GT5 wasn't much talked about in this article anyway because its not a GT5 article in the first place. Its a forza 4 article with a subtle comparison.



-----------double post------------



Around the Network
mantlepiecek said:
selnor said:
mantlepiecek said:

Forza 4 didn't really win the head to head because there was no head to head. Digitalfoundry seems to think they are both as good as it gets and Polyphony seems to be the one that tries to introduce something new in racing sims. I am stating only this because for some (weird) reason you guys are picking on gt5 throughout the thread.

There's also a forza 3 vs forza 4 comparison, its a good article overall.


They did. They just refrained from committing. They did a side by side comparison. Gave us all the facts and figures and then said you decide. Either people choose to ignore the figures or not. Obviously the side by side favoured FM4 heavily in all recorded data they obtained.

Err...it didn't win. It does have better performance, but that doesn't mean GT5 has bad performance. GT5 wasn't much talked about in this article anyway because its not a GT5 article in the first place. Its a forza 4 article with a subtle comparison.

I'm sorry dude I was winding you up. I couldnt resist in hte vain of the thread. 

I have an opinion. But I wont wreck the thread wit it here. :))))))))))))))))))))))



mantlepiecek said:
selnor said:
mantlepiecek said:

Forza 4 didn't really win the head to head because there was no head to head. Digitalfoundry seems to think they are both as good as it gets and Polyphony seems to be the one that tries to introduce something new in racing sims. I am stating only this because for some (weird) reason you guys are picking on gt5 throughout the thread.

There's also a forza 3 vs forza 4 comparison, its a good article overall.


They did. They just refrained from committing. They did a side by side comparison. Gave us all the facts and figures and then said you decide. Either people choose to ignore the figures or not. Obviously the side by side favoured FM4 heavily in all recorded data they obtained.

Err...it didn't win. It does have better performance, but that doesn't mean GT5 has bad performance. GT5 wasn't much talked about in this article anyway because its not a GT5 article in the first place. Its a forza 4 article with a subtle comparison.

I'm sorry dude I was winding you up. I couldnt resist in hte vain of the thread. 

I have an opinion. But I wont wreck the thread wit it here. :))))))))))))))))))))))



mantlepiecek said:
selnor said:
mantlepiecek said:

Forza 4 didn't really win the head to head because there was no head to head. Digitalfoundry seems to think they are both as good as it gets and Polyphony seems to be the one that tries to introduce something new in racing sims. I am stating only this because for some (weird) reason you guys are picking on gt5 throughout the thread.

There's also a forza 3 vs forza 4 comparison, its a good article overall.


They did. They just refrained from committing. They did a side by side comparison. Gave us all the facts and figures and then said you decide. Either people choose to ignore the figures or not. Obviously the side by side favoured FM4 heavily in all recorded data they obtained.

Err...it didn't win. It does have better performance, but that doesn't mean GT5 has bad performance. GT5 wasn't much talked about in this article anyway because its not a GT5 article in the first place. Its a forza 4 article with a subtle comparison.

I'm sorry dude I was winding you up. I couldnt resist in hte vain of the thread. 

I have an opinion. But I wont wreck the thread wit it here. :))))))))))))))))))))))



selnor said:
mantlepiecek said:
selnor said:
mantlepiecek said:

Forza 4 didn't really win the head to head because there was no head to head. Digitalfoundry seems to think they are both as good as it gets and Polyphony seems to be the one that tries to introduce something new in racing sims. I am stating only this because for some (weird) reason you guys are picking on gt5 throughout the thread.

There's also a forza 3 vs forza 4 comparison, its a good article overall.


They did. They just refrained from committing. They did a side by side comparison. Gave us all the facts and figures and then said you decide. Either people choose to ignore the figures or not. Obviously the side by side favoured FM4 heavily in all recorded data they obtained.

Err...it didn't win. It does have better performance, but that doesn't mean GT5 has bad performance. GT5 wasn't much talked about in this article anyway because its not a GT5 article in the first place. Its a forza 4 article with a subtle comparison.

I'm sorry dude I was winding you up. I couldnt resist in hte vain of the thread. 

I have an opinion. But I wont wreck the thread wit it here. :))))))))))))))))))))))

Now we both had double posts. Lets just make up and wreck vgc instead.