I posted after the votals had come out and showed that prof was at L-2.  How I worded the post as how I felt about the situation.  In the very previous game the same style gambit was played by another person,  and all it did was hurt the town and was the focus of discussion for almost 2 full days.   Ending it quickly was the only way to put the town in the best situation.

So I just had a thought go through my head.  It clicked based on Silver Tigers post in regards to Radish.  So what this made me do is go back and look at all of Radish's posts.

He has made 3 posts that were actually relevant towards the game thus far (not counting the welcome post).

Post 1:

This was his ONLY relevant post on Day 1.

So he is trying to be very careful.  He doesn't want to seem too pushy with lynching Prof.

I wasn't really sure what to think when Prof claimed miller; unlike others, who wanted nothing but to see him dead. I was expecting there to be a big debate like there was last round with Linkz where I could put forward my ideas, but Prof got killed really early.

Post 2: 

Pointless mind games he didn't want to participate in, yet he specifically asked on day 1:

This shows that he is interested in these mind games, not that he sees them as pointless.

Just last game, Radish played along with the "pointless" mind games as well and said his character had a nice ass.

Those were mind games? I was talking about the battle between Prof and Trucks

Also, before the votes even started flying out, it was he who said we should think about what we want to do, yet he NEVER even gave his own thoughts about what we should do, instead just defending his lack of posts on day 1 by saying it was simply pointless mind games going on.

Post 3:

I have to sort of laugh at this one, as the first and second paragraphs are rather hippocritical.  So he's been trying to read further into posts so he understands things better, yet doesn't get why Hatmoza all of a sudden said I'm 100% town, when it seems so obvious.  The fact that it is hippocritical isn't even the issue, though.  He is saying he wants to understand the situation completely so he doesn't make any stupid posts.

After reading a little more, I think I understand the situation - Hat softclaimed prostitute, right?

This doesn't mean he shouldn't make any posts.  And maybe I'm being suspicious about nothing, but why did Radish start doing this in this specific game.  Why is he so worried about making a mistake in this particular game, when (no offense to you radish, just trying to get a point across) in past games, he has taken very little heed to making mistakes in his posts.

Just trying to get better at this game- I felt that if I read more posts rather than commented on them without hearing multiple arguments for the same point, then I would be more credible

I think you are so worried about making mistakes and being overly cautious because you want to fly under the radar and not appear scummy.

HoS: Radish

Why the sudden change in the way you play this game Radish, and why does it seem like you are trying to fly underneath everybody's radar?

Don't forget- I normally jump into everyone's radar near the middle of day 1, but since I was asleep for the majority of day 1, I didn't have the oppotunity to make a mistake like that. You should be thankful for that, since I now have additional information that can help me make better decisions for the rest of the round.

I posted after the votals had come out and showed that prof was at L-2.  How I worded the post as how I felt about the situation.  In the very previous game the same style gambit was played by another person,  and all it did was hurt the town and was the focus of discussion for almost 2 full days.   Ending it quickly was the only way to put the town in the best situation.

Heph was already a dancer (and for anybody who've played the game: a mighty sexy one, I'd say :p) which is just an alias for prostitute. There is no way that there two roleblockers in a game of 10 players. Your lack of attention is disturbing.. and suspicious.

(before anybody mentions it: Yeah, I know I missed the fact that prof00 was hated, but that doesn't mean I can't point it out, too.)

I like saying it how I see it. You are not cleared to me and what you are doing feels very much like a scum plot. Not a bad one since it forces the town to be causious. I am skeptical of hints, and open conections with claims at best, but this " I love you I tust you 100% with no more info than that? Then asking for protection? please

ok wasn't sure on  that part but figured it was most likely the case.

The sad thing about the whole situation is that prof's lynh seems to be more on him than the town with the claim that was counter to his role and his contradicting himself between wanting to be scaned after his fist post of the game saying to not waste the scan.

Ending discussion is NEVER the best situation. How do you come to that conclusion? The proof that what you said is BS is the very death of prof00.

If we actually used the time we had left to discuss prof's situation, we might have come to the conclusion that he wasn't anti-town. I will not lie here: prof fucked up and made himself a lynch target, and I would likely voted him myself. Maybe we would habe still lynched him, who knows, but to cut off discussion is never a good thing. The discussion is made because points are being brought up that might proof a persons guilt or innocence. The more we discuss about it, the clearer the point gets until we realise it's a good lead or moot point. In any case, it's always good we do this, for 2 reasons: 1.) We understand if the point is worth looking into or not, 2.) the discussion itself reveals people's mind and/or opinions, which again leads to points. That's what this whole game is about!

The fact that you deny discussion on something undermines my suspicion.