Nicely put, This ^

This*

These are a little long (9 minutes each I think) but they're worth the watch trust me! :)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w5369-OobM4&list=PLD07D73CD6333903F&index=4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7w57_P9DZJ4&feature=related

Just incase you actually do accept that but believe it was "intelligently designed" to happen
Here's a great clip on that, that'll really make you think: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ISg6j7BF02Q&list=PLD07D73CD6333903F&index=2

Now this is my own personal way of knowing the world is far older than 6000 years. How would the billions of species with populations in the millions/billioms that have all been discovered, live within the space of 6000 years? You would literally have to stack animals on top of eachother xD Only 1% of species that have ever walked the earth are alive today. The species we have today were pretty much the same a few thousand years ago, apart from small mutations/adaptions and a few animals that have evolved rapidly. Now if those 1% of all species needed atleast a couple thousand years to sustain them at the same time, let's say 50,000 years (rough guestimate), all I need to do is some simple maths, 50,000 x 100 (1% x 100), and that would give me the age the earth would at LEAST need to be to of been able to sustain the amount of animals we've discovered. I didn't really have to use any complicated science, just my own common sense. And ofcourse, the estimates aren't accurate and many species have/had been on the earth for much longer or shorter then the figure I guessed, but it's just a generalization. 

I probably didn't articulate myself all too well in that last paragraph, it's because I hardly ever write/say that, I just sort of visualize it in my head, so it's hard to put into words. I don't mind if you ignore it :)

You display a rather big lack of knowledge about the scientific method of verification and falsification. Please educate yourself on those concepts and reread your post again.

Radio Carbon Dating versus a 7,000 year old Earth

Go.

I enjoyed watching those, thanks :)

Alright cool :) But just to let you know, the most important part of that post is the videos

Everything is theory until proven fact or as some say proven wrong.. The automic bomb was theoritical until trial and error prove it fact. So was space travel. In these cases one can say verification and falsification works as the process was observed.

Scientists always use the words "we think" or "we believe" when dealing with earth's distant past because it is was not observed. We look at what is left and draw conclusions from that. Documentaries and the media drops the "scentists think" most of the time.

My point is that there are many different theories from the origins of modern man to occurences in distant space. Verification and falsification has not yet given a definitive answer on way or the other because other scientists dispute a lot of mainstream theories. Who is right?  There was a brilliant book on this but I can't remember the title.

I don't think you going to understand that anyway seeing you didn't get my first post.

Yeah, about noahs flood...

http://evolution.mbdojo.com/flood.html

About modern scientific stuff in the bible:
Yeah, poetic language vaguely correlating to current knowledge is really convicing,.

About bible prophesies coming true:
There are bible prophesies that didn't come true, and can't come true anymore as the circumstances that would allow them to happen no longer exist. Jesus did not fulfill all the messianic prophesies.
But hell, there's no need to be objective and include things against your case, is there?