On page 20 ofthis Nintendo stock drop thread on NeoGAF, several posters noticed that Nintendo's stock actually fellpriorto the conference. Now, I will be up front with the fact that I can't read stock charts for beans, and I'm only going by what these more financially savvy cats are saying. Nonetheless, if what they say is true, the stock drop was just your typical market fluctuation, completely unrelated to the conference. In fact, stock quickly returned to pre-drop levels, so this has been a whole lot of worry over nothing.

I'm quite surprised that the folks at Reuters didn't catch their mistake right away, what with finance being theirjoband all. I guess the thrill of posting a "Nintendo is doomed" article was too enticing to allow them to think straight. Still, that doesn't erase the shareholders' sentiment that Nintendo had a poor showing, although I doubt anything save an announcement of a trueMarioorPokémongame on iPhone would have satisfied them. For what it's worth, I am looking forward to a number of games that were on display, like the oddly namedBravely Default. Doesn't that sound like a fairy who has missed a loan payment yet is unafraid of the consequences?"

I think he's refering to this from neogaf:

I don't really no much about the stock market so I don't really know if this is correct. But I have noticed gaming sites on the interwebs correcting their stories on the stock dip. Saying it was due to normal fluctuations in the market.

Is this true?