By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General Discussion - Mafia Round 32 - Harry Potter

Linkzmax said:
Hephaestos said:
TadpoleJackson said:
Ok, after re-reading this whole discussion I see it as being pointless. And that's the extent to which I am going to comment on it

good, at least someone who understood all that was said ^^ (no sarcasm or anything)

So you're happy that someone is possibly saying what is primarily your case against prof, Wonk, and myself is pointless? I mean I can see a reason to be happy if you think someone doesn't believe you're scum, but going back to square one is not a joyous occasion.

nope, the discution with wonk was pointless. I read wonk as trying to twist the situation, not analyze it. Prof had barely reacted to what I said on him at that point and so did you. So all in all, there wasn't all that much for dsis to react on.

He knows full well that a post of "there's nothing for me to comment on" is likely to be raising eyebrows, so if he posts this, I understand it as him knowing the consequenses and the implications.



OoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoO

Around the Network
Linkzmax said:
Hephaestos said:
MARCUSDJACKSON said:

i don't know wht going on but i side with you

haha, well, mafia is a game. We are trying to find out who is mafia through discution and the mafia is trying to frame players.

By not posting in the game for a few days, all that happens is that you were likely to be modkilled. Now that you've posted, you're actually expected to follow the discution and participate ^^.

While you may be simply explaining the premise of Mafia, this really comes off to me like you're buddying up to Marcus AND know him to be town.

no, that'd be parenting... it's not like we overflow with new players and marcus is an active poster, so getting him interested in the game (despite the initial lurking) is indeed my aim.

and that'd be pretty bad buddying as it resulted in him voting me :p



OoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoO

OK so now i've finally read all (at work)
nothing to add on the remaing posts besides that i'm glad linkz understands my wonk point. To me that is the main info of the day, wonk's reaction (others might think the day's info is on me, that's beyond the point though ^^).

I'm also surprised by proff's calm... then again, he has realy changed his play in the past few months so it's not really inconsistant.

Unvote

Vote : JohnYo


tomorow will be the time to look at Wonk more closely.



OoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoO

  L-4 L-3 L-2
Yo_john Tadpole Linkz Heph
Heph TruckoWonkus Marcus -
No Lynch Yo_john - -

For players:

L-2; Yo_john: Tadpole, Linkz, Heph

L-3; Heph: TruckoWonkus, Marcus

L-4; No Lynch: Yo_john

By players:

Wonk: Heph

Heph: Prof->Unvote->Yo_john

Tadpole: Wonk->Unvote->Yo_john

Marcus: Heph

Yo_john: No Lynch

Linkz: Yo_john

Given that the day is not yet over, I will be modkilling Soleron just as soon as I have time, which should be mid afternoon.  If the day is over, he will simply die with the lynch/night flavor.

Remember that Soleon dying will make it so only 4 votes are required to lynch somebody, not the 5 we are currently using.



Money can't buy happiness. Just video games, which make me happy.

Linkzmax said:
MARCUSDJACKSON said:
lynch Heph

Have any reasoning behind your vote, or are you just piggybacking off of Wonk's reasoning?

I'll cut you some slack because I think there's a very good chance you're town, but the latter is generally looked at as scummy.(mafia-like) Futhermore, giving your own opinion on a situation is vital for allowing others to try to gauge your alignment.


don't know either person. i'm new and still trying to understand the formula



Around the Network
MARCUSDJACKSON said:
Linkzmax said:
MARCUSDJACKSON said:
lynch Heph

Have any reasoning behind your vote, or are you just piggybacking off of Wonk's reasoning?

I'll cut you some slack because I think there's a very good chance you're town, but the latter is generally looked at as scummy.(mafia-like) Futhermore, giving your own opinion on a situation is vital for allowing others to try to gauge your alignment.


don't know either person. i'm new and still trying to understand the formula

so why do you want to lynch heph?



All hell I may as well go with the flow.

unvote

 Vote: Lynch yo_john117



Hephaestos said:
OK so now i've finally read all (at work)
nothing to add on the remaing posts besides that i'm glad linkz understands my wonk point. To me that is the main info of the day, wonk's reaction (others might think the day's info is on me, that's beyond the point though ^^).

I'm also surprised by proff's calm... then again, he has realy changed his play in the past few months so it's not really inconsistant.

Unvote

Vote : JohnYo


tomorow will be the time to look at Wonk more closely.


funny how you say he understands a point then come and put something different in.

all he said of your point with me was he agreed I said the same point twice and that is true in the sence that I said it both in my vote and in responce to prof when he brough up a different point.

he also shoots down your point of me and prof, so I'm not sure what you really think he's validating.

I find it interesting how you went from calling prof intimidating to calm



theprof00 said:
MARCUSDJACKSON said:
Linkzmax said:
MARCUSDJACKSON said:
lynch Heph

Have any reasoning behind your vote, or are you just piggybacking off of Wonk's reasoning?

I'll cut you some slack because I think there's a very good chance you're town, but the latter is generally looked at as scummy.(mafia-like) Futhermore, giving your own opinion on a situation is vital for allowing others to try to gauge your alignment.


don't know either person. i'm new and still trying to understand the formula

so why do you want to lynch heph?

his post seems suspicious, but i'm starting to question your post aswell.



MARCUSDJACKSON said:
theprof00 said:
MARCUSDJACKSON said:
Linkzmax said:
MARCUSDJACKSON said:
lynch Heph

Have any reasoning behind your vote, or are you just piggybacking off of Wonk's reasoning?

I'll cut you some slack because I think there's a very good chance you're town, but the latter is generally looked at as scummy.(mafia-like) Futhermore, giving your own opinion on a situation is vital for allowing others to try to gauge your alignment.


don't know either person. i'm new and still trying to understand the formula

so why do you want to lynch heph?

his post seems suspicious, but i'm starting to question your post aswell.

Oh you are, are you?

Pray tell, what do you question about it, why is it suspicious? And then how about explaining why Hephs post is suspect?

If you're feeling generous, don't spare any details. Explain specifically why, and then, explain why it makes sense given the overall context, and then maybe outside factors. You don't have to give me all that explanation, but I'd like something more than the simple single sentences you've been providing so far.