By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Wii Has The Best Exclusives

It's obviously a matter of personal taste, and my personal taste agrees.



VGChartz

Around the Network
AbbathTheGrim said:
RolStoppable said:
Sure, you could claim that the 360 and PS3 have better exclusives, but you would be wrong. Other than pure subjectivity you would have nothing to back it up.


Nintendo only knows how to look for a different way that Mario can jump over another turtle to defeat it. Nintendo cannot enter with games targetted to different markets that exclude little kids, they don't dare to do it, they know they can't succeed, as it happened with Eternal Darkness.

While 360s and Sony's exclusive make serious attempts to push videogames as ways of art, Nintendo has nothing. They can't make a decent story with their frachises, they can't make their characters say meaningful things that won't sound lame. And if you are of the ones that think that videos get in the way of gameplay, take for example masterpieces like Bioshock and Fallout which have the most intelligent merge of gameplay and story without any of them getting in the way of the other.

There are games in Xbox360 that I would like to have in my PS3, but there is nothing in the Nintendo console that I would be interested in. My mother found a DSi with Mario in it and, apart from playing some parts that she cannot get across, I don't touch that thing for anything.


I didn't want to get involved in this thread, but...

- " Nintendo only knows how to look for a different way that Mario can jump over another turtle to defeat it."

Sony and MS only know how to look for a different way to  shoot another guy to kill him. See what I did there?

- "Nintendo cannot enter with games targetted to different markets that exclude little kids, they don't dare to do it, they know they can't succeed, as it happened with Eternal Darkness."

Games like Metroid, Zelda and SMG 1 & 2 are made just for kids, people. You heard it here first. Adults only play games that are 'art' and have stories with cutscenes. They don't play 'kiddy' Nintendo games.

- "While 360s and Sony's exclusive make serious attempts to push videogames as ways of art, Nintendo has nothing. They can't make a decent story with their frachises, they can't make their characters say meaningful things that won't sound lame."

I laughed at this point. Sony and MS are trying to push games as art. Right...that's their goal.

Good stories  are so rare in video-games that it's downright amusing you would make this point.

" And if you are of the ones that think that videos get in the way of gameplay, take for example masterpieces like Bioshock and Fallout which have the most intelligent merge of gameplay and story without any of them getting in the way of the other."

That's great and all, but it has been shown that the majority of gamers out there prefer games that lets them be in complete control of their character. They don't want cut-scenes after cut-scenes and Quick time events and all that shit. They want to play their way, not the way the devs want them to play. They want to be able to "make their own story" and not be forced to follow a shitty story-line they don't really care about.

There's a market out there that loves a long story with their gameplay and those games should keep being made but that market is significantly smaller than the larger market. 

Not sure why you keep talking about art this and art that. You are playing video-games first and foremost. Not sure what you are trying to convince yourself of. A game like SMG 2 is full of creativity and can be argued to be art even though it doesn't try to be. Art for you must just mean blood and cursing and guns since you say Nintendo games are not art. You are probably one of those people that feels your maturity is threatened when someone tells you that games are toys.

Stories in games are still in their primitive stages and have a LONG way to go. Come and talk to me when the majority of games trying to push stories don't have a shitty and cliched story.



AbbathTheGrim said:
Pavolink said:
And the thread goes on with "my opinion is a fact"...

Which exclusive games are the best will be a discussion without end, even when facts will be thrown in the battlefield, there is no way one party will convince the other.

However, a fact is that the attempt that third parties and first parties from Xbox360 and PS3 have done in converting this medium into an artistic form of its own (that goes beyond the artistic aesthetic of how cute Mario looks in Nintendo's last game and how fun is to fly Mario with his new ear-wings) has more weight than anything that can be argued against. Videogames are bound to be regarded as singular artisct experience that will focus in the user experience through his interactivity with the virtual world, the decisions he makes that affect both this world and the STORYLINE, and the emotions this evokes.

No other art form can provoke this experience and emotions, and Nintendo is not doing anything in this field to be part of this movement and in fact, they are the main detractors of this along with downloadable games from iPad and iPhones which give only disposable and superficial experiences. If you guys prefer these games that is your problem, but playing a gotcha match with your friend will never be as meaningful as watching the Mona Lisa or listening to the Ninth Symphony, not for humanity.

Perfect example. Thank you to prove my point. Like I said, this goes on "my opinion is a fact"...



Proud to be the first cool Nintendo fan ever

Number ONE Zelda fan in the Universe

DKCTF didn't move consoles

Prediction: No Zelda HD for Wii U, quietly moved to the succesor

Predictions for Nintendo NX and Mobile


RolStoppable said:
Sure, you could claim that the 360 and PS3 have better exclusives, but you would be wrong. Other than pure subjectivity you would have nothing to back it up.


Actually, since pure subjectivity is the only thing that matters when it comes to like or dislike, that is good or bad games, he would be right.

Later edit: ...he would be right, for him the exclusives would be better.



o_O.Q said:

personally i think this article is garbage as i could just as easily list top rated xbox 360 or ps3 exclusives and claim they have better exclusives, what about you guys

This



Around the Network
Play4Fun said:
AbbathTheGrim said:
RolStoppable said:
Sure, you could claim that the 360 and PS3 have better exclusives, but you would be wrong. Other than pure subjectivity you would have nothing to back it up.


Nintendo only knows how to look for a different way that Mario can jump over another turtle to defeat it. Nintendo cannot enter with games targetted to different markets that exclude little kids, they don't dare to do it, they know they can't succeed, as it happened with Eternal Darkness.

While 360s and Sony's exclusive make serious attempts to push videogames as ways of art, Nintendo has nothing. They can't make a decent story with their frachises, they can't make their characters say meaningful things that won't sound lame. And if you are of the ones that think that videos get in the way of gameplay, take for example masterpieces like Bioshock and Fallout which have the most intelligent merge of gameplay and story without any of them getting in the way of the other.

There are games in Xbox360 that I would like to have in my PS3, but there is nothing in the Nintendo console that I would be interested in. My mother found a DSi with Mario in it and, apart from playing some parts that she cannot get across, I don't touch that thing for anything.


I didn't want to get involved in this thread, but...

- " Nintendo only knows how to look for a different way that Mario can jump over another turtle to defeat it."

Sony and MS only know how to look for a different way to  shoot another guy to kill him. See what I did there?

- "Nintendo cannot enter with games targetted to different markets that exclude little kids, they don't dare to do it, they know they can't succeed, as it happened with Eternal Darkness."

Games like Metroid, Zelda and SMG 1 & 2 are made just for kids, people. You heard it here first. Adults only play games that are 'art' and have stories with cutscenes. They don't play 'kiddy' Nintendo games.

- "While 360s and Sony's exclusive make serious attempts to push videogames as ways of art, Nintendo has nothing. They can't make a decent story with their frachises, they can't make their characters say meaningful things that won't sound lame."

I laughed at this point. Sony and MS are trying to push games as art. Right...that's their goal.

Good stories  are so rare in video-games that it's downright amusing you would make this point.

" And if you are of the ones that think that videos get in the way of gameplay, take for example masterpieces like Bioshock and Fallout which have the most intelligent merge of gameplay and story without any of them getting in the way of the other."

That's great and all, but it has been shown that the majority of gamers out there prefer games that lets them be in complete control of their character. They don't want cut-scenes after cut-scenes and Quick time events and all that shit. They want to play their way, not the way the devs want them to play. They want to be able to "make their own story" and not be forced to follow a shitty story-line they don't really care about.

There's a market out there that loves a long story with their gameplay and those games should keep being made but that market is significantly smaller than the larger market. 

Not sure why you keep talking about art this and art that. You are playing video-games first and foremost. Not sure what you are trying to convince yourself of. A game like SMG 2 is full of creativity and can be argued to be art even though it doesn't try to be. Art for you must just mean blood and cursing and guns since you say Nintendo games are not art. You are probably one of those people that feels your maturity is threatened when someone tells you that games are toys.

Stories in games are still in their primitive stages and have a LONG way to go. Come and talk to me when the majority of games trying to push stories don't have a shitty and cliched story.

1) Flower lets you control a petal who ventures a fields in a quest to restore beauty to nature while every action you take emitts sounds that enriches the music you hear in the background which comes to be a rich soundtrack of diverse tones that evoke feelings of melancholy, warmness and sadness.

Ico forces you to protect a little girl and take her through various obstacles. Her death means the end of your game, the bond you create with her throughout the game is meaningful and the game is a great excersie for the mind.

In Heavy Rain, a game that made me realize that in order to achieve that impact of a user in a videogame you don't need to make an RPG, lets you control various characters and your actions have an immidiate or long term consequence in what happens. There is a lot of improvement that could be done with this concept, letting you affect the storyline in a deeper way but this game is the tip of the iceberg and the possibilities are endless.

Now, tell me how Nintendo brings this diversity?

2) I said that Nintendo does not dare to make a product that earns a rating which will exclude little kids. I am not surprised to know that adults play those games and even I could enjoy them as I enjoy games like LittleBigPlanet, good old 2D Mario, Jak and Daxter, Ratchet and Clank, etc. and I played several times games from the NES and SNES, but videogames are becoming something that goes beyond entertainment and Nintendo is not on that boat. There are times where things need to touch themes of sexuality, violence, suffering and you cannot be restrained by a Teen or Everyone rating. But oh well, what cares Nintendo about stories in the first place.

3) A painter sells his paintings, a musician performs in concerts and asks money for entrance. This does not jeopardize the artistic value of what they do. If you cannot realize the depth surrounding characters like Snake or James Sullivan and the emotions that provoke a simple yet heartbreaking game like Shadow of the Colossus, then you either haven't played them or you don't attach to games of this kind. I know people who have no interest in music, paintings or well-written movies so I won't be surprised.

4) "It has been shown that the majority of gamers out there prefer games that lets them be in complete control of their character"... where? Are you one of those people that releases data out of common sense and tries to pass what they conclude as facts. Tell me which stadistics you took in account? Tell me which survey was conducted that showed such results? Tell me what organization made the survey? Tell me the number of the population that the survey made an impact to and what was the demographic? You cannot provide this? Then don't make such generalizations.

You just showed that you have no idea of what you are talking about when you are talking about Bioshock and Fallout. I won't say it myself, ask anyone who has really played Bioshock and Fallout and ask them how many cut-scenes and quicktime events those games have between the intro and the ending. Make some research before writting please. I mentioned those games because the story is not presented through cut-scenes.

You think you have control over your character with games like Metroid, Mario and Donkey Kong? Can you choose to side with Koopa? Can you forgo the neverending quest of saving the Princess? Can you opt not to do the quest to save the princess and get immersed in what is happening in another kingdom? Can you let the Princess die and continue the game? Can you talk Koopa and make him surrender? What is the freedom you are talking about?

You say that the market of people who want videogames with stories is smaller than the one who just wants to play? Tell me which stadistics you took in account? Tell me which survey was conducted that showed such results? Tell me what organization made the survey? Tell me the number of the population that the survey made an impact to and what was the demographic? You cannot provide this? Then don't make such conclusions.

And what if the market is smaller? Transformers earned 709 millions while Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind only got 72. What is your point?

Games are becoming art. And some games are providing true unique artistic experience through them which you cannot have while watching a movie, watching a painting, seeing a sculpture, listening to music, or reading a book. If you are not interested in videogames as art, perfect, that is your bussiness and I enjoy such games as well, but don't try to undermind what games like Silent Hill, Fallout, Flower, Mass Effect, Heavy Rain, Shadow of the Colossus, and others are doing, or you will fail miserably.

Stories in videogames can be as good as any other work of fiction in another form of art. Go and play great games with great stories and if you can play them without your agenda in mind you will see it, unless you think that Ice Age is miles better than 2001: A Space Odyssey, in which case, there is not much that can be done for you 

If you can reply to my post, reply to everything and don't argue back only against some points here and there that you came up with something against.

 



Nintendo is selling their IPs to Microsoft and this is true because:

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=221391&page=1

Pavolink said:
AbbathTheGrim said:
Pavolink said:
And the thread goes on with "my opinion is a fact"...

Which exclusive games are the best will be a discussion without end, even when facts will be thrown in the battlefield, there is no way one party will convince the other.

However, a fact is that the attempt that third parties and first parties from Xbox360 and PS3 have done in converting this medium into an artistic form of its own (that goes beyond the artistic aesthetic of how cute Mario looks in Nintendo's last game and how fun is to fly Mario with his new ear-wings) has more weight than anything that can be argued against. Videogames are bound to be regarded as singular artisct experience that will focus in the user experience through his interactivity with the virtual world, the decisions he makes that affect both this world and the STORYLINE, and the emotions this evokes.

No other art form can provoke this experience and emotions, and Nintendo is not doing anything in this field to be part of this movement and in fact, they are the main detractors of this along with downloadable games from iPad and iPhones which give only disposable and superficial experiences. If you guys prefer these games that is your problem, but playing a gotcha match with your friend will never be as meaningful as watching the Mona Lisa or listening to the Ninth Symphony, not for humanity.

Perfect example. Thank you to prove my point. Like I said, this goes on "my opinion is a fact"...

I am not making an opinion. I am stating a fact. Look for a definition of art. Try to find a form of art that lets you have control and impact the the work of fiction and receive feedback from it through emotions. Analyze what videogames do regarding this concept. See what Nintendo has done and is doing to enrich such experiences in videogames.



Nintendo is selling their IPs to Microsoft and this is true because:

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=221391&page=1

o_O.Q said:
TruckOSaurus said:

Like it's been said before it's all a matter of taste. If we take Kantor's list :

PS3 exclusives rated above 90:

  • Uncharted 2 (I completely agree!)
  • LBP (I hate that game)
  • MGS4 (Not as good as other games in the series)
  • LBP2 (See above)
  • God of War III (I agree!)
  • MLB 10 (Sports game, blurg)
  • Killzone 2 (FPS, hate those)
  • MLB 09 (Sports game, no interest)

So as you can see, the PS3  90+ exclusive list only has 2 games I really love while the Wii list has 4.

yes and while that may the case it doesn't change the fact that the ps3 and 360 lists individually are longer

Yeah but I don't care about the opinion of Metacritic. All that matters is my own list.

I have a Wii because the absolutely awesome exclusives games it has, I own a PS3 for multiplaform games first and exclusives second and I own a 360 for the Kinect games and exclusive JRPGs.



Signature goes here!

aww some people disagree with someone else's opinion and starts adding third party games even though the article was about exclusives. and some even add games that are below an 8 even though all the games mentioned with scores next to them are over 8 :P

to be fair though not all the games mentioned are exclusives right now like the tales game and no more heroes..



    R.I.P Mr Iwata :'(

AbbathTheGrim said:

I am not making an opinion. I am stating a fact. Look for a definition of art. Try to find a form of art that lets you have control and impact the the work of fiction and receive feedback from it through emotions. Analyze what videogames do regarding this concept. See what Nintendo has done and is doing to enrich such experiences in videogames.

No need to continue. You have done very well.



Proud to be the first cool Nintendo fan ever

Number ONE Zelda fan in the Universe

DKCTF didn't move consoles

Prediction: No Zelda HD for Wii U, quietly moved to the succesor

Predictions for Nintendo NX and Mobile