| eddlemaistre said: I'm pretty sure I saw a video with Scott Rohde saying that PSVita will be sold at a profit day one? |
However Kaz said otherwise and I'm pretty sure he would know.
| eddlemaistre said: I'm pretty sure I saw a video with Scott Rohde saying that PSVita will be sold at a profit day one? |
However Kaz said otherwise and I'm pretty sure he would know.
I largely agree that this E3 didn't really have any surprising announcements outside of PSV price, but even that didn't blow me away because all I could think about was the potential monthly fee associated with it. Other than that though Sony didn't show much in the way of unknown or new or 'exciting' looking games (in my eyes) and all of their big hitting game shows were titles we already knew about. My biggest gripe about their conference was the complete lack of enthusiasm, particularly Jack Tretton he looked like he wanted to cry through the whole thing... probably because of how dull he is.
Microsoft had similar problems as far as unknown or surprise announements but people have been very hard on them saying many untruths about how very little first party content was shown and, falsely, that it was all "childish Kinect games". If you actually break it down they had 7 first party games shown, and a number of 3rd party exclusive games or game content shown and four big multiplats too, the problem was many of them had already been known/seen previously to a certain degree. In my eyes their biggest failure was in making me disappointed that Halo 4 got announced which is something that shouldn't be possible. I guess though that being somebody who is just waiting for a reason to get Kinect many things at the show had me pretty excited. You must also give them credit for actually being enthusiastic about their show. The Don 'geeky Cruise' Mattrick always looks too smug for his own good.
Nintendo should have won with ease considering they had a new home console to show off and reveal, instead all they succeeded in doing is creating quizical looks, by showing off what many thought was actually just a peripheral for the Wii and completely ingnoring the console, personally it didn't confuse me but it did annoy and disappoint me that they ignored the console itself. Other than that they pissed off loyal Wii owner by announcing nothing new and only showing one game for it, Zelda Skyward Sword, after a percievably long winded orchestral performance... even if I did enjoy the music I couldn't help but think "C'mon you're wasting my time here". they did however deliver some good news in the way of a few big hitting first party titles for the 3DS, but a couple of those may or maynot make it this year which is news we don't want on a system like the 3DS that currently lacks much in the way of must have titles. I have never liked Reggie, his face needs to meet a fist...
| Aiddon said: uh, Nintendo didn't even need to elaborate on anything else. They'll answer questions when the time comes. Just another example of the current crop of gamers being both impatient and unpleasable. |
I am a Nintendo fanboy and very patient. I have no issues on waiting for playable demos, full specs, price, etc. My suggestions would have removed all the many questions and conversations taking place. It would have defined it far better in a way that is already defined by Nintendo without giving up the secret goods.
You're statement is just another example of people being sheep.
More like my opinions of E3...because I really don't agree with you for the most part
| yo_john117 said: More like my opinions of E3...because I really don't agree with you for the most part |
So you think MS had a quailty conference that wasn't focused on soft, Sony had tons of new and exciting PS3 stuff, and Nintendo had no mistakes on WiiU?
superchunk said:
I am a Nintendo fanboy and very patient. I have no issues on waiting for playable demos, full specs, price, etc. My suggestions would have removed all the many questions and conversations taking place. It would have defined it far better in a way that is already defined by Nintendo without giving up the secret goods. You're statement is just another example of people being sheep. |
Let's see, being called a sheep, how should I react to this? Oh yes, now I remember: SCREW YOU, TOO. Welcome to the real world: Nintendo needed to show nothing but the controller. That was enough.
Aiddon said:
Let's see, being called a sheep, how should I react to this? Oh yes, now I remember: SCREW YOU, TOO. Welcome to the real world: Nintendo needed to show nothing but the controller. That was enough. |
I disagree.
How many people have clamoured on about it just being controller and not a new console?
How many people made a bid deal out of the trivial use of PS360 gameplay?
How many people ask the same questions about wether or not its as powerful as PS360?
All of this should have been appparent along with the details of the new controller.
superchunk said:
|
All three of them had a good balance IMO
yo_john117 said:
All three of them had a good balance IMO |
Then you are a very kind and the type of person who doesn't expect much of anything from this type of stuff.
As a project manager and someone who watches a lot of this stuff, I think my concerns are valid.
superchunk said:
Then you are a very kind and the type of person who doesn't expect much of anything from this type of stuff. As a project manager and someone who watches a lot of this stuff, I think my concerns are valid. |
Once you reach a certain amount of games anything else is just too much.