phinch1 said:
Kasz216 said:
phinch1 said:
ot going to agree so lets just leave it...
|
In very rare cases... and then they sued someone who made their robot dog do tricks and increase the sales of the product... Sony pretty much goes one way on this.
Aside from which... we have different opinions... but the thing is... I'm basing mine on something. I don't see anything your basing your opinion on... except wanting to have an opinion that is what it is. It would be like argueing about evoltion. One person has something they can point to as a precedent (like I just did with A52) while another group has none.
|
this guy obviously has some talent, but in order to use the cell fully he should have paid to use development tools just like every other developer, and if he had something to share, share it on the PSN store like everyone else. if he's getting all the access to the cell by "hacking" how pissed off are all the other devlopers going to be after all the hoops they jumped through and money they spent, just to see someone do it for free, this is why i think he took it too far. happy now?
|
Well no. Because again, you haven't cited anything... and no offense... but that's really... a silly reason.
It's like saying that someone who is able to make rice crispy treats in their home shouldn't because it would piss off everyone who has to go to the store to buy them.
I at least get on some level the slippery slope it lead to piracy arguement even though it's a logical fallacy... i can understand why people would think that way.
Being mad at a hacker because he allows people to use their system in a new way rather then the way a corporation tries to restrict consumer rights because developers MAY be pissed off that people are no longer artificially constrained... is just... bizare.
I mean... maybe if we lived in like... Medievil England and people were upset that the printing press suddenly alowed the serfs to get books or something but.... such a strange classist arguement is just... well strange.