By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - Sony defends response time to hacker breach

Reuters

Sony Corp's CEO was unapologetic about the company's delay in informing the more than 100 million customers of its PlayStation Network whose account information was stolen by hackers last month.

In a stark departure from the remorseful tone struck just two weeks ago, when senior executives including heir apparent Kazuo Hirai bowed in apology in Tokyo, Sony Chief Executive Howard Stringer fired back at critics who say the company was too slow to notify consumers once the attack was known.

"This was an unprecedented situation," Stringer told reporters on Tuesday, speaking publicly for the first time since the April breach.

"Most of these breaches go unreported by companies. Forty-three percent (of companies) notify victims within a month. We reported in a week. You're telling me my week wasn't fast enough?"

The attack, considered the biggest in Internet history, prompted the Japanese electronics giant to shut down its PlayStation Network and other services for close to a month.

Critics slammed the company for waiting up to a week before telling its customers of the attack and the possible theft of credit card information, prompting lawmakers and state attorneys general to launch investigations.

Two members of the U.S. House of Representatives sent a letter to Sony on Tuesday, urging it to respond to questions about its security strategy and reveal more details about the data breach.

In the letter, Representatives Mary Bono Mack of California and G.K. Butterfield of North Carolina said they had contacted Sony on April 29 but all of their questions had not been answered by the company. The lawmakers asked Sony to respond to questions by May 25.

Sony said it expected to face monetary charges from the break-in but was still assessing the damage.

"There's a charge for the system being down ... a charge for identity theft insurance," Stringer said. "The charges mount up, but they don't add up to a number we can quantify just yet."

One expert estimated that costs from the break-in could reach as high as $2 billion.

Addressing a report that said hackers had used Amazon.com's servers to launch the attack on Sony, Sony executives said it saw no evidence this was the case.

Sony began restoring parts of the network last weekend in the United States and expects a full recovery in all countries by the end of May.

HIRAI POSITION SECURE

The handling of the crisis, the worst Sony has faced in years, has been a big test of Hirai, who has led the recovery operations as president and group chief executive of Sony Computer Entertainment.

Stringer reiterated his support for Hirai.

"I think his leadership has been very helpful and very demonstrative and I'm endorsing him," Stringer said.

Although Stringer has been in daily contact with Hirai, he thought it best to have Hirai take the lead. "This is his environment, his people, his intimate relationships with PlayStation subscribers and they like him."

What has bothered some of its customers and made Sony a big target in the hacking world is its practice of clamping down on customers who meddle with its systems.

Sony sued a famed hacker, George Hotz, this year for copyright infringement and circumventing PlayStation 3's protection schemes. Hotz, who is well known for "jailbreaking," or unlocking Apple Inc's iPhone, said on his blog he was not involved in the break-in.

The company settled the charges against Hotz on April 11. About a week later, Sony's systems were hacked.

Mark Harding, a Maxim Group analyst, said Sony could have employed less severe methods to protect itself from copyright infringement. "There were probably better ways Sony could have done it without being heavy handed," he said.

Stringer said the attack was likely related to its suit against Hotz but defended Sony's actions.

"An act was done that was dangerous to Sony, dangerous to PlayStation and we thought it was a criminal act and we had to protect ourselves."

http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/05/17/us-sony-hacker-idUSTRE74G41G20110517



Around the Network

an attempt to notify people of such breaches should be done in a maximum of 48 hours.  "look there are others just as bad as us" doesnt excuse anything.  



"I like my steaks how i like my women.  Bloody and all over my face"

"Its like sex, but with a winner!"

MrBubbles Review Threads: Bill Gates, Jak II, Kingdom Hearts II, The Strangers, Sly 2, Crackdown, Zohan, Quarantine, Klungo Sssavesss Teh World, MS@E3'08, WATCHMEN(movie), Shadow of the Colossus, The Saboteur

MrBubbles said:

an attempt to notify people of such breaches should be done in a maximum of 48 hours.  "look there are others just as bad as us" doesnt excuse anything.  


what he said wasnt "there are others just as bad as us", he said "our actions have been one of the best"



cory.ok said:
MrBubbles said:

an attempt to notify people of such breaches should be done in a maximum of 48 hours.  "look there are others just as bad as us" doesnt excuse anything.  


what he said wasnt "there are others just as bad as us", he said "our actions have been one of the best"


I'm having a hard time taking in his words without thinking he's bluffing them to better suit his case.

I mean, if their response was "one of the best," then why did the US government issue statements to Sony about their lateness?



wfz said:
cory.ok said:
MrBubbles said:

an attempt to notify people of such breaches should be done in a maximum of 48 hours.  "look there are others just as bad as us" doesnt excuse anything.  


what he said wasnt "there are others just as bad as us", he said "our actions have been one of the best"


I'm having a hard time taking in his words without thinking he's bluffing them to better suit his case.

I mean, if their response was "one of the best," then why did the US government issue statements to Sony about their lateness?


the us government didnt issue any statement, a house representative did, and after issueing a statement he called for a vote on a piece of his legislation that was midly relevant to the hacking

the bill (which didnt pass last time) that he wants revisited is probably the reason he got involved

 

im not going to say sony had no fault, in hindsight we can see problems that happened, but thats in hindsight. in the moment sony did what they thought was best. if we got warnings everytime that there was an attack on something that held some of our personal information everyone would get a daily message that there was a possibility that their information was compromised.



Around the Network
cory.ok said:
wfz said:
cory.ok said:
MrBubbles said:

an attempt to notify people of such breaches should be done in a maximum of 48 hours.  "look there are others just as bad as us" doesnt excuse anything.  


what he said wasnt "there are others just as bad as us", he said "our actions have been one of the best"


I'm having a hard time taking in his words without thinking he's bluffing them to better suit his case.

I mean, if their response was "one of the best," then why did the US government issue statements to Sony about their lateness?


the us government didnt issue any statement, a house representative did, and after issueing a statement he called for a vote on a piece of his legislation that was midly relevant to the hacking

the bill (which didnt pass last time) that he wants revisited is probably the reason he got involved

 

im not going to say sony had no fault, in hindsight we can see problems that happened, but thats in hindsight. in the moment sony did what they thought was best. if we got warnings everytime that there was an attack on something that held some of our personal information everyone would get a daily message that there was a possibility that their information was compromised.

Actually no,  a whole US senate committee sent them a letter about it.

That first guy was a different case.



Kasz216 said:
cory.ok said:
wfz said:
cory.ok said:
MrBubbles said:

an attempt to notify people of such breaches should be done in a maximum of 48 hours.  "look there are others just as bad as us" doesnt excuse anything.  


what he said wasnt "there are others just as bad as us", he said "our actions have been one of the best"


I'm having a hard time taking in his words without thinking he's bluffing them to better suit his case.

I mean, if their response was "one of the best," then why did the US government issue statements to Sony about their lateness?


the us government didnt issue any statement, a house representative did, and after issueing a statement he called for a vote on a piece of his legislation that was midly relevant to the hacking

the bill (which didnt pass last time) that he wants revisited is probably the reason he got involved

 

im not going to say sony had no fault, in hindsight we can see problems that happened, but thats in hindsight. in the moment sony did what they thought was best. if we got warnings everytime that there was an attack on something that held some of our personal information everyone would get a daily message that there was a possibility that their information was compromised.

Actually no,  a whole US senate committee sent them a letter about it.

That first guy was a different case.

i believe we're actually talking about the same person, mary bono mack. she is chairman in a subcommittee, but as far as ive seen the committee hasnt moved on sony, only mary and one other person.

mary bono mack is my representative (one of californias reps) and she has pretty much just been sensationalizing the event, like any other media.

she was just scheduled (on may 4th) to put forward a bill related to this (though i think it was actually about cell phones).

she just wants her legislation passed

send me a link to what youre talking about if you still think were talking about a different person



cory.ok said:
Kasz216 said:
cory.ok said:
wfz said:
cory.ok said:
MrBubbles said:

an attempt to notify people of such breaches should be done in a maximum of 48 hours.  "look there are others just as bad as us" doesnt excuse anything.  


what he said wasnt "there are others just as bad as us", he said "our actions have been one of the best"


I'm having a hard time taking in his words without thinking he's bluffing them to better suit his case.

I mean, if their response was "one of the best," then why did the US government issue statements to Sony about their lateness?


the us government didnt issue any statement, a house representative did, and after issueing a statement he called for a vote on a piece of his legislation that was midly relevant to the hacking

the bill (which didnt pass last time) that he wants revisited is probably the reason he got involved

 

im not going to say sony had no fault, in hindsight we can see problems that happened, but thats in hindsight. in the moment sony did what they thought was best. if we got warnings everytime that there was an attack on something that held some of our personal information everyone would get a daily message that there was a possibility that their information was compromised.

Actually no,  a whole US senate committee sent them a letter about it.

That first guy was a different case.

i believe we're actually talking about the same person, mary bono mack. she is chairman in a subcommittee, but as far as ive seen the committee hasnt moved on sony, only mary and one other person.

mary bono mack is my representative (one of californias reps) and she has pretty much just been sensationalizing the event, like any other media.

she was just scheduled (on may 4th) to put forward a bill related to this (though i think it was actually about cell phones).

she just wants her legislation passed

send me a link to what youre talking about if you still think were talking about a different person

Mary Bono would prove the more then one person.

Then it's already more then "one congressmen" as there was Jay Blumenthal as well... he was the first one who i thought you meant.

Also John D Rockefeller of W. Virginia.

Bobby Rush - D

http://it.tmcnet.com/news/2011/05/01/5478463.htm

Looks like plenty of politcians

Cliff Sterns, Henry Waxmen

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0511/54273.html

None of these actually being what I was talking about either... but just stuff that showed up as i tried to work backwords through google news.

 

Which, is more then enough to prove the point... because i've only gone back 6 days... while this was weeks ago.



Kasz216 said:
cory.ok said:
Kasz216 said:
cory.ok said:
wfz said:
cory.ok said:
MrBubbles said:

an attempt to notify people of such breaches should be done in a maximum of 48 hours.  "look there are others just as bad as us" doesnt excuse anything.  


what he said wasnt "there are others just as bad as us", he said "our actions have been one of the best"


I'm having a hard time taking in his words without thinking he's bluffing them to better suit his case.

I mean, if their response was "one of the best," then why did the US government issue statements to Sony about their lateness?


the us government didnt issue any statement, a house representative did, and after issueing a statement he called for a vote on a piece of his legislation that was midly relevant to the hacking

the bill (which didnt pass last time) that he wants revisited is probably the reason he got involved

 

im not going to say sony had no fault, in hindsight we can see problems that happened, but thats in hindsight. in the moment sony did what they thought was best. if we got warnings everytime that there was an attack on something that held some of our personal information everyone would get a daily message that there was a possibility that their information was compromised.

Actually no,  a whole US senate committee sent them a letter about it.

That first guy was a different case.

i believe we're actually talking about the same person, mary bono mack. she is chairman in a subcommittee, but as far as ive seen the committee hasnt moved on sony, only mary and one other person.

mary bono mack is my representative (one of californias reps) and she has pretty much just been sensationalizing the event, like any other media.

she was just scheduled (on may 4th) to put forward a bill related to this (though i think it was actually about cell phones).

she just wants her legislation passed

send me a link to what youre talking about if you still think were talking about a different person

Mary Bono would prove the more then one person.

Then it's already more then "one congressmen" as there was Jay Blumenthal as well... he was the first one who i thought you meant.

Also John D Rockefeller of W. Virginia.

Bobby Rush - D

http://it.tmcnet.com/news/2011/05/01/5478463.htm

Looks like plenty of politcians

Cliff Sterns, Henry Waxmen

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0511/54273.html

None of these actually being what I was talking about either... but just stuff that showed up as i tried to work backwords through google news.

 

Which, is more then enough to prove the point... because i've only gone back 6 days... while this was weeks ago.


so your point is that more than one representative cares about this? (there are something like 450 representatives)

my point is that its being sensationalized so people can get things done that wouldnt otherwise be done.

btw the two articles that you mentioned are actually people who are trying to get their bills passed, the guy in first one is pushing an alternative to bono macks, while the second one is bono macks. theyre using this as leverage to get their bills passed (which are likely not going to be passed anyways)



cory.ok said:
Kasz216 said:
cory.ok said:
Kasz216 said:

Actually no,  a whole US senate committee sent them a letter about it.

That first guy was a different case.

i believe we're actually talking about the same person, mary bono mack. she is chairman in a subcommittee, but as far as ive seen the committee hasnt moved on sony, only mary and one other person.

mary bono mack is my representative (one of californias reps) and she has pretty much just been sensationalizing the event, like any other media.

she was just scheduled (on may 4th) to put forward a bill related to this (though i think it was actually about cell phones).

she just wants her legislation passed

send me a link to what youre talking about if you still think were talking about a different person

Mary Bono would prove the more then one person.

Then it's already more then "one congressmen" as there was Jay Blumenthal as well... he was the first one who i thought you meant.

Also John D Rockefeller of W. Virginia.

Bobby Rush - D

http://it.tmcnet.com/news/2011/05/01/5478463.htm

Looks like plenty of politcians

Cliff Sterns, Henry Waxmen

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0511/54273.html

None of these actually being what I was talking about either... but just stuff that showed up as i tried to work backwords through google news.

 

Which, is more then enough to prove the point... because i've only gone back 6 days... while this was weeks ago.


so your point is that more than one representative cares about this?

my point is that its being sensationalized so people can get things done that wouldnt otherwise be done.

btw the two articles that you mentioned are actually people who are trying to get their bills passed, the guy in first one is pushing an alternative to bono macks, while the second one is bono macks. theyre using this as leverage to get their bills passed (which are likely not going to be passed anyways)

Except you know... this happens a lot... and they don't go after most companies.

I don't see your point... that senators who think companies who are cavalier with peoples personal information want to pass bills that are harder on irresponsible companies?