theprof00 said: @Baal |
you're asking a whole lot of him.
I agree on the first part, but the list of Fos/Hos... well if he has fun with it ^^
OoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoO
theprof00 said: @Baal |
you're asking a whole lot of him.
I agree on the first part, but the list of Fos/Hos... well if he has fun with it ^^
OoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoO
Linkzmax said:
Where in the world did you pull these numbers from? I thought your SK killing mafia numbers were off last round too, but that was out of thread so I didn't care to check/correct. The actual odds of 2 mafia from last game being part of a 3man mafia team is: Still fairly high, but not close to likely. Then again those are the odds of picking any two random players and them being mafia. NotStan wanted to know odds of 2 players being mafia in both games, and even though they are different events and thus meaningless, for giggles it's 0.3% for a 3man crew and 0.6% for a 4man crew. |
that math is wrong, you made the ods of 3 mafia being in the same team, not 2...
OoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoO
ah oops, no you didn't :p
the first one needs the odd of being mafia too, he's not at 100% =D nevermind ^^
OoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoO
actually yeah you did something wrong, it's not 2 random townies, it's 2 players that were mafia, so you shouldn't ^2 the odds as you did, it's not 0,3%, it the first calcs you did at 3% or so
OoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoO
Hephaestos said: actually yeah you did something wrong, it's not 2 random townies, it's 2 players that were mafia, so you shouldn't ^2 the odds as you did, it's not 0,3%, it the first calcs you did at 3% or so |
stop with the math you'll make baal unhappy somehow the votals might show you lynched >:D
not that I'd complain if they did :D
zarx said:
Vote No lynch |
This is one of the things that lets me believe that zarx is scum - when I pressure him because he didn't vote yet, he suddently votes Vette (because of lurking), and then when Vette is a little defensiv, he just unvotes and votes no lynch - then he even admits to have skipped pages (oh they are sooo uninteresting).
zarx said:
|
So why do you think now is the right time for a no lynch?
@ Vette: I am also pretty upset about the whole thing with the posts activity right now, this game should act as a stress reliever for me, but when I feel forced to play it just loses all the fun (and I think I had a lot of fun playing until yesterday).
And to not get accused of lurking again - I cannot be sure if I will have internet access until tomorrow in the morning (GMT 1) or even later , but tomorrow sometimes I should get internet access.
Stefl1504 said: @ Vette: I am also pretty upset about the whole thing with the posts activity right now, this game should act as a stress reliever for me, but when I feel forced to play it just loses all the fun (and I think I had a lot of fun playing until yesterday). |
I know what you feel, man. This has been dragging out for way too long, we're over 900 posts already, and that on day one.
updated: 14.01.2012
playing right now: Xenoblade Chronicles
Hype-o-meter, from least to most hyped: the Last Story, Twisted Metal, Mass Effect 3, Final Fantasy XIII-2, Final Fantasy Versus XIII, Playstation ViTA
bet with Mordred11 that Rage will look better on Xbox 360.
Linkzmax said:
Continue to ignore it, because there is no explanation. I said the PM stated whether or not I would be penalized. Never did I say I absolutely would be penalized. Care to explain how you forget that since I was vague about it every single time? |
the problem I see is why would ABC have the compultion to PM you on this when you have a role that just can't be penalized anyways... it didn't seem right with a role that could be penalized in the first place, but there it makes even less sense that he PMed you...
anyways no need to over think this before tomorow.
OoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoO
Wonktonodi said:
not that I'd complain if they did :D |
yeah sorry forgot I was reading with lag :p
OoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoO
Wonktonodi said:
the llama winks at you ;) |
actually the treacheous lover seems all the more likely than this.... we'll have to see.
OoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoO