Btw notstan, the odds for two players from last game being scum this game are
3 mafia this game: 18.9% chance
4 mafia this game: 33.8% chance
Odds are actually pretty high.
Btw notstan, the odds for two players from last game being scum this game are
3 mafia this game: 18.9% chance
4 mafia this game: 33.8% chance
Odds are actually pretty high.
TruckOSaurus said:
You conviently disappear during the shitstorm and come back once it's over acting all offended, I don't like this one bit but I do agree with you that we need to lynch scum today so: Vote: NotStan |
completely agree with this. Furthermore, I believe the aggressiveness is tied to one of those two being mafia.
A treacherous lover, for example...(Probably linkz)
Stefl1504 said:
@ Zarx - first I did not like your reaction one bit when you had placed my vote on you, I don't have played enough games with you to know how you usually react to a pressure to post vote - GoW just did that what I wanted to do him at that point - he made a contributing post - you instead complained about getting voted - further instead of doing something against my suspicion of you, you just point out that there are two other lurkers, at a point my vote wasn't placed on you just because of the lurking-factor earlier... also you are very carefull with voting linkz while you even HoSd him - If I am not wrong there were many times when you could have voted him without casting suspicion on you or lynching him and now don't say that you prefer a no lynch - because then you would have voted No Lynch some time agod(I did not forget that I forbade you voting for some hours). I already explained why Linkz is so low on my list, and again you are just thinking I am onto you because of lurking - Stop trying to distract my attention to lurkers. |
The pointing out lurkers thing was more to do with the fact that I didn't understand why you didn't suspect them at all. The reason I never voted for Linkz was that I just wasn't convinced that he was scum or that it would benifit the town. I was offline when you told me not to vote BTW. And I didn't vote no lynch because there was so much going on and several candidates for being scum, I guess I just didn't think there was a need for a no lynch vote with no time limit and someone with 4 votes against him.
@TheVoxelman on twitter
I can't say NotStan is looking that scumy to me, Vett with his lurking and parroting seems like a much better target.
Vote Vetteman94
@TheVoxelman on twitter
zarx said: I can't say NotStan is looking that scumy to me, Vett with his lurking and parroting seems like a much better target. Vote Vetteman94 |
I love how parrotting has become a reason to lynch someone. Its like if you dont have a specific reason that is unique from everyone else you are scum. Its like its impossible for 2 people to agree on an idea as to how someone is acting, and you both cant use that reason to think someone is scum.
As for the lurking, it seems my definition of the word lurking is different from yours, please explain how I am lurking?
theprof00 said:
completely agree with this. Furthermore, I believe the aggressiveness is tied to one of those two being mafia. A treacherous lover, for example...(Probably linkz) |
Arent Lovers normally one Mafia and one Town?
Vetteman94 said:
I love how parrotting has become a reason to lynch someone. Its like if you dont have a specific reason that is unique from everyone else you are scum. Its like its impossible for 2 people to agree on an idea as to how someone is acting, and you both cant use that reason to think someone is scum. As for the lurking, it seems my definition of the word lurking is different from yours, please explain how I am lurking? |
Well you missed the first few days even tho you were on VGchartz and since then you haven't posted a lot, and most posts you have made have been in responce to someone targetting you like me voting you now. The fact that you have not posted in ages and then post imediaatly after I vote for you proves my point. The vote was a test to see if you were really lurking as in reading the thread but not posting unless adressed .
@TheVoxelman on twitter
Vetteman94 said:
Arent Lovers normally one Mafia and one Town? |
No, Lovers just don't know the alignment of the other.
Treacherous lover, however,is where one is mafia and one is town.
updated: 14.01.2012
playing right now: Xenoblade Chronicles
Hype-o-meter, from least to most hyped: the Last Story, Twisted Metal, Mass Effect 3, Final Fantasy XIII-2, Final Fantasy Versus XIII, Playstation ViTA
bet with Mordred11 that Rage will look better on Xbox 360.
zarx said:
Well you missed the first few days even tho you were on VGchartz and since then you haven't posted a lot, and most posts you have made have been in responce to someone targetting you like me voting you now. The fact that you have not posted in ages and then post imediaatly after I vote for you proves my point. The vote was a test to see if you were really lurking as in reading the thread but not posting unless adressed . |
I wasnt anywhere near a computer the first 2 days. Interestingly despite missing the first 2 days I have posted more than you have. And of course I am going to respond to people targetting me, its is my job as a player to adress any issues someone has with me.
My last post was 8 hours ago, I didnt realize that 8 hours is now the equivilant of ages. But before your post response to Stefl you hadnt posted in 16 hours, that must be an eternity.
My advice to you is, dont accuse someone of lurking when you are a bigger offender then they are
Silver-Tiger said:
No, Lovers just don't know the alignment of the other. Treacherous lover, however,is where one is mafia and one is town. |
OK, so its possible that one of you is still Mafia, since you dont know each others alignment, you cant specifically say the other is or is not Mafia