By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General Discussion - VGC Mafia Round 29 -Grand Theft Auto 4 edition!

Linkzmax said:
Vetteman94 said:

Vote Linkzmax

I believe you are lying about not reading your role PM,  I believe you did read it, saw that you were scum and said that you didnt read it so there couldnt be possible links to your scum buddies through the firrst day posts.  I believe you fabricated the second PM as well, since there was no reason for you to get a second PM, as you hadnt made any roleclaims of any sort.

Well you're wrong about both, because I have still yet to read my role PM. I did receive a second PM, which I believe ABC sent because with all of the votes he may have thought I would roleclaim. I've received two more that's just been chatting with ABC basically, but I bet you aren't going to believe that either.

I can't believe I didn't notice this before. Either I'm really stupid and I'm missing something, or this is a slip up. How would someone roleclaim without reading his role PM ? And why would a mod decide to butt into the game to stop someone from role-claiming, when the repercussions of doing so are given in one of the first posts in this thread. This is really fishy, and I think more than justifies the fact that you're very close to being lynched right now.

Linkzmax said:

Bigass post where Linkz nameclaimed, hinted at being a bomb and voted vetteman.

Ahhh...hinting at being a bomb. Sheer mafia desperation or the truth...or both (o_o) ? I find it a little hard to believe its desperation that you thought was necesarry, since you were stuck at L-2 for a very long time...and it didn't look as if you were gonna be lynched at the time (but maybe you finally got sick of all the pressure) . But, I'd like to point out that you were at L-1 once (when you hadn't read your PM). If you were hammered at the time, and is pro-town, and is telling the truth, you would've taken someone with you..and possibly a townie too. I hope you see that what you did by not reading your PM was wrong. But the previous quote I made about you still bothers me. I think there is a good chance that you are lying, and you seem to be the least likely to be a mislynch out of those who I think are possible lynch targets right now.

And according to GTA IV flavour, IIRC (haven't played that game since I platinum'd it...yeah...I played more than 40 hours of boredom online) Bernie is pre-occupied with getting married to some politician who is married to a woman to be involved with bombs. The only bomb I can see him being is a sex bomb :P 

What you say about vetteman is very valid though, as I pointed out...vetteman up for a day 1 lynch is odd..the dude is ridiculous enough to attempt no lynches on day 2, let alone day 1. 

Also on vette, I think heph, ff and wildvine dragged the whole "when i have pro-town roles" thing a bit too far..cause (maybe its because i'm not a native english speaker) i didn't think there was a slip up there.. and neither did many others since most others didn't seem interested in that.

Silver-Tiger said:

1.)No, I did not forget the conversation. What I meant is that Niko Bellic is scum and Dimitri Rascalov (or whatever his name was) is town. It's a misunderstanding and I'm sorry, I worded that terribly.

2.)Of course I know my alignment, I'm pro-town. I read my PM after all.....

As for the third-party, yes, it's possible that there is a cult or SK. I'm asking you, why not? Does it seem that unlikely that in a GTA-themed game there is a serial killer or a cult? I did not imply that you have on of these roles, I just clarified that these roles my exist in this game.

There is no way in fucking hell anyone can justify Dimitri Rascolov being pro-town. NO FUCKING WAY. He is, and always be EVIL. End of Discussion. By this I assume you mean that you have a role of a character that might be considered to be EVIL in GTA IV ? Niko might kill people, but so does almost EVERY character in GTA IV, and flavour hints at Niko being pro-town.

FoS Silver-Tiger

And do you guys really think there'd be another anti-town killing role (other than the mafia) in a game of 13 people, and an unkillable tree stump ? Seems a bit far fetched to me.

TruckOSaurus said:
Silver-Tiger said:
TruckOSaurus said:

Something something about the last game including something about DAY TWO and ABC


dude, you know that ABC is the mod, right?

Dude, you do know I was talking about last game right?

Maybe Silver-Tiger didn't bother to read properly because he is scum :P I know that sounds really stupid, but its certainly an issue. Also, I'd like to point out that the amount of people who didn't read the post where linkz nameclaimed is disturbing.

Who didn't read that post ? Lets observe -

Hephaestos did, but he noticed it later. Silver-Tiger (again) on the other hand didn't read it, and questioned heph where he was getting that info from in the post where he noticed that linkz had roleclaimed. See below -

Silver-Tiger said:
Hephaestos said:
Hephaestos said:

wait so now you read your PM?

ZOMG he did roleclaim, he is bernie crane (not heph's real words) :P


Wait, where did you got that information from?

Silver-Tiger...If you're pro-town, read the damn posts or GTFO. If you're not pro-town (looking less likely by the minute) then please die. Maybe we can make that happen ? If linkz's lynch doesn't happen, I'd definitely want to see you lynched today. But fuck that, because you people never support my lynch targets. Ever. Maybe its because I was a bit crazy in the earlier rounds, but I've made a conscious effort to be less of that in this round. 

I'm posting these as I go on reading the thread, so I'll update my previous FoS to

HoS Silver-Tiger

Also, Silver-Tiger, I understand this post is HUGE...but try to read it :P

Final-Fan said:

If I think Linkz is probably town, would it be wrong to lynch him on the strength of his own comments that it might be for the best? 

I know is some games, I've voted for people, who in the back of my mind, I knew were probably pro-town. And I'd always say go with your gut feeling. But I'm a sucker for lynches, and have been involved in mislynches in the past where I knew what I was doing was probably wrong. I didn't feel that way about linkz before...but I'm starting to get that feeling (probably because day one is being dragged on for waay to long). But I'd say, because him being a bomb not making sense given his character and the first quote in this post which strikes me as odd, I'd keep my vote on him, unless I can convince the rest of you that silver-tiger is scum (due to his ignorance, amongst other things mentioned in this very post). 

But with ABC butting in every once in a while to this thread, I think there might be a possibilty that linkz wasn't lying about his 2nd PM from ABC. I don't know what to think anymore. ARGH !!!

Stefl1504 said:

I think that everyone under 25 posts should try to post a little more and 10 is just too little so GoW should post a lot more...

IF,

1. I didn't multiquote and make such bigass posts

2. Had a stable internet connection yesterday

3. Post random/impatient bullshit that adds nothing to the discussion

4. Wonder out loud

I would've had more posts. I think these "POTALS" don't mean jackshit. I've contributed more than people who come in here, make a single lined post and disappear every 2 hours or so. (Ex - zarx, wildvine, notstan)

On topic of those 3, I'd say wildvine and zarx have higher possibilities of being scum. I believe notstan is just a little noobish. But maybe its because he hasn't posted much since I started reading this thread I feel that way...hmmm..

Wonktonodi said:
Silver-Tiger said:


wouldn't it a bit obvious if I defended him the whole time?

And if I knew it would go to L1, I would have unvoted earlier. By the time I checked back in, He was already at L1.


you're vote put him at L2 what were you expecting it to do?  Also why did it take you more that 7 minutes to unvote him. Since if he was at "L1" when you saw it that would have been before hephs unvote. Yet your unvote was 7 minutes later?

This is just amazing... My thoughts on Silver-Tiger are definitely not improving in the positive direction. 

Oh this is interesting. 

Time limits - zarx, notstan, and final-fan want time limits. ALL 3 of them have voted No Lynch right now. Maybe if you manned up to take a risk and vote for linkz, especially since some of you probably wanted to, you wouldn't need a time limit right now. It also makes me wonder if they voted no lynch to try and stay away from the action and slip under the radar in the event that linkz is a mislynch, and are probably anxious to get to the night.

I take back what I said about notstan. He popped up to vote for a time limit, and didn't comment on anything else. Smells like mafia eager to get to the night, to prevent his scum tell from leaking out. Actually, its true for all 3 of these players, but notstan the most, with zarx close behind.

Hephaestos said:
GodOfWar_3ever said:

I'm here, and I'll be spending time (hours) to catch up. 


I would of thought you'd use Kratos as an MK avatar ^^

I'm a god of war fan. I'm a mortal kombat fan. But I'm not a god of war in mortal kombat fan. Kratos is a pretty cool bonus character to screw around with I guess. But I like mk for the mk characters, especially sub-zero, kitana and reptile. I don't need to see kratos' bald ass everywhere i go :P

Also, on the topic on MK, I'd like to host a MK game again. Yes, we already had one. But (no offense to nen-suer) it didn't reach its full potential given the rich lore of MK, and it had a lot of crappy post UMK3 characters. Anyone up for that ?



Around the Network
GodOfWar_3ever said:
Linkzmax said:
Vetteman94 said:

Vote Linkzmax

I believe you are lying about not reading your role PM,  I believe you did read it, saw that you were scum and said that you didnt read it so there couldnt be possible links to your scum buddies through the firrst day posts.  I believe you fabricated the second PM as well, since there was no reason for you to get a second PM, as you hadnt made any roleclaims of any sort.

Well you're wrong about both, because I have still yet to read my role PM. I did receive a second PM, which I believe ABC sent because with all of the votes he may have thought I would roleclaim. I've received two more that's just been chatting with ABC basically, but I bet you aren't going to believe that either.

I can't believe I didn't notice this before. Either I'm really stupid and I'm missing something, or this is a slip up. How would someone roleclaim without reading his role PM ? And why would a mod decide to butt into the game to stop someone from role-claiming, when the repercussions of doing so are given in one of the first posts in this thread. This is really fishy, and I think more than justifies the fact that you're very close to being lynched right now.

Linkzmax said:

Bigass post where Linkz nameclaimed, hinted at being a bomb and voted vetteman.

Ahhh...hinting at being a bomb. Sheer mafia desperation or the truth...or both (o_o) ? I find it a little hard to believe its desperation that you thought was necesarry, since you were stuck at L-2 for a very long time...and it didn't look as if you were gonna be lynched at the time (but maybe you finally got sick of all the pressure) . But, I'd like to point out that you were at L-1 once (when you hadn't read your PM). If you were hammered at the time, and is pro-town, and is telling the truth, you would've taken someone with you..and possibly a townie too. I hope you see that what you did by not reading your PM was wrong. But the previous quote I made about you still bothers me. I think there is a good chance that you are lying, and you seem to be the least likely to be a mislynch out of those who I think are possible lynch targets right now.

And according to GTA IV flavour, IIRC (haven't played that game since I platinum'd it...yeah...I played more than 40 hours of boredom online) Bernie is pre-occupied with getting married to some politician who is married to a woman to be involved with bombs. The only bomb I can see him being is a sex bomb :P 

What you say about vetteman is very valid though, as I pointed out...vetteman up for a day 1 lynch is odd..the dude is ridiculous enough to attempt no lynches on day 2, let alone day 1. 

Also on vette, I think heph, ff and wildvine dragged the whole "when i have pro-town roles" thing a bit too far..cause (maybe its because i'm not a native english speaker) i didn't think there was a slip up there.. and neither did many others since most others didn't seem interested in that.

Silver-Tiger said:

1.)No, I did not forget the conversation. What I meant is that Niko Bellic is scum and Dimitri Rascalov (or whatever his name was) is town. It's a misunderstanding and I'm sorry, I worded that terribly.

2.)Of course I know my alignment, I'm pro-town. I read my PM after all.....

As for the third-party, yes, it's possible that there is a cult or SK. I'm asking you, why not? Does it seem that unlikely that in a GTA-themed game there is a serial killer or a cult? I did not imply that you have on of these roles, I just clarified that these roles my exist in this game.

There is no way in fucking hell anyone can justify Dimitri Rascolov being pro-town. NO FUCKING WAY. He is, and always be EVIL. End of Discussion. By this I assume you mean that you have a role of a character that might be considered to be EVIL in GTA IV ? Niko might kill people, but so does almost EVERY character in GTA IV, and flavour hints at Niko being pro-town.

FoS Silver-Tiger

And do you guys really think there'd be another anti-town killing role (other than the mafia) in a game of 13 people, and an unkillable tree stump ? Seems a bit far fetched to me.

TruckOSaurus said:
Silver-Tiger said:
TruckOSaurus said:

Something something about the last game including something about DAY TWO and ABC


dude, you know that ABC is the mod, right?

Dude, you do know I was talking about last game right?

Maybe Silver-Tiger didn't bother to read properly because he is scum :P I know that sounds really stupid, but its certainly an issue. Also, I'd like to point out that the amount of people who didn't read the post where linkz nameclaimed is disturbing.

Who didn't read that post ? Lets observe -

Hephaestos did, but he noticed it later. Silver-Tiger (again) on the other hand didn't read it, and questioned heph where he was getting that info from in the post where he noticed that linkz had roleclaimed. See below -

Silver-Tiger said:
Hephaestos said:
Hephaestos said:

wait so now you read your PM?

ZOMG he did roleclaim, he is bernie crane (not heph's real words) :P


Wait, where did you got that information from?

Silver-Tiger...If you're pro-town, read the damn posts or GTFO. If you're not pro-town (looking less [EDIT : Should be MORE likely] likely by the minute) then please die. Maybe we can make that happen ? If linkz's lynch doesn't happen, I'd definitely want to see you lynched today. But fuck that, because you people never support my lynch targets. Ever. Maybe its because I was a bit crazy in the earlier rounds, but I've made a conscious effort to be less of that in this round. 

I'm posting these as I go on reading the thread, so I'll update my previous FoS to

HoS Silver-Tiger

Also, Silver-Tiger, I understand this post is HUGE...but try to read it :P

Final-Fan said:

If I think Linkz is probably town, would it be wrong to lynch him on the strength of his own comments that it might be for the best? 

I know is some games, I've voted for people, who in the back of my mind, I knew were probably pro-town. And I'd always say go with your gut feeling. But I'm a sucker for lynches, and have been involved in mislynches in the past where I knew what I was doing was probably wrong. I didn't feel that way about linkz before...but I'm starting to get that feeling (probably because day one is being dragged on for waay to long). But I'd say, because him being a bomb not making sense given his character and the first quote in this post which strikes me as odd, I'd keep my vote on him, unless I can convince the rest of you that silver-tiger is scum (due to his ignorance, amongst other things mentioned in this very post). 

But with ABC butting in every once in a while to this thread, I think there might be a possibilty that linkz wasn't lying about his 2nd PM from ABC. I don't know what to think anymore. ARGH !!!

Stefl1504 said:

I think that everyone under 25 posts should try to post a little more and 10 is just too little so GoW should post a lot more...

IF,

1. I didn't multiquote and make such bigass posts

2. Had a stable internet connection yesterday

3. Post random/impatient bullshit that adds nothing to the discussion

4. Wonder out loud

I would've had more posts. I think these "POTALS" don't mean jackshit. I've contributed more than people who come in here, make a single lined post and disappear every 2 hours or so. (Ex - zarx, wildvine, notstan)

On topic of those 3, I'd say wildvine and zarx have higher possibilities of being scum. I believe notstan is just a little noobish. But maybe its because he hasn't posted much since I started reading this thread I feel that way...hmmm..

Wonktonodi said:
Silver-Tiger said:


wouldn't it a bit obvious if I defended him the whole time?

And if I knew it would go to L1, I would have unvoted earlier. By the time I checked back in, He was already at L1.


you're vote put him at L2 what were you expecting it to do?  Also why did it take you more that 7 minutes to unvote him. Since if he was at "L1" when you saw it that would have been before hephs unvote. Yet your unvote was 7 minutes later?

This is just amazing... My thoughts on Silver-Tiger are definitely not improving in the positive direction. 

Oh this is interesting. 

Time limits - zarx, notstan, and final-fan want time limits. ALL 3 of them have voted No Lynch right now. Maybe if you manned up to take a risk and vote for linkz, especially since some of you probably wanted to, you wouldn't need a time limit right now. It also makes me wonder if they voted no lynch to try and stay away from the action and slip under the radar in the event that linkz is a mislynch, and are probably anxious to get to the night.

I take back what I said about notstan. He popped up to vote for a time limit, and didn't comment on anything else. Smells like mafia eager to get to the night, to prevent his scum tell from leaking out. Actually, its true for all 3 of these players, but notstan the most, with zarx close behind.

Hephaestos said:
GodOfWar_3ever said:

I'm here, and I'll be spending time (hours) to catch up. 


I would of thought you'd use Kratos as an MK avatar ^^

I'm a god of war fan. I'm a mortal kombat fan. But I'm not a god of war in mortal kombat fan. Kratos is a pretty cool bonus character to screw around with I guess. But I like mk for the mk characters, especially sub-zero, kitana and reptile. I don't need to see kratos' bald ass everywhere i go :P

Also, on the topic on MK, I'd like to host a MK game again. Yes, we already had one. But (no offense to nen-suer) it didn't reach its full potential given the rich lore of MK, and it had a lot of crappy post UMK3 characters. Anyone up for that ?

Whoops a small mistake, edited in BOLD ^^^



My Scum Suspects -

1. Linkz

For obvious reasons. Yet my suspicions on him are getting less confident as the day goes on. Maybe his "you're wrong, but i don't blame you" posts are fucking with my head. I don't know :/

2. Silver-Tiger

Ignorance of posts, possibly because he is mafia. 

As he mentioned once in the thread earlier, he hints that he may have a role that may be considered to be "evil" in GTA IV. Name =/= Alignment, yes, I understand, but his behaviour on this matter is odd.

Vote, unvote on linkz in VERY quick succession, and suddenly convinced he is pro-town afterwards ?

3. and 4. Vetteman and Stefl 

Suspect them because of their change of playstyle...especially stefl.

5, 6 and 7. Notstan, Zarx and Wildvine

Lack of contributions, mostly from Zarx and Wildvine. For Notstan, his early stumbles are also a reason.

Rest of you, I have no clue of... :/



Silver-Tiger said:
Silver-Tiger said:
"There's a reason why I unvoted Linkz, I can't imagine why he would come up with the PM story if he's scum (I mean that he read the PM and is scum, but pretends he did not read it). he pratically paints a target on himself. I just don't expect such a move from an experienced player like Linkz. He is a hell of an dangerous player for the scum if he's town. That's why I don't want to loose him. Of course he's as dangerous as scum player, but.... something tells me he is pro-town."

"Again, I asking everyone to refrain from voting Linkz because of the whole Pm fiasco. I do not suspect him at all."


"I really see no reason for you to roleclaim, especially on day one.  I suspect that under the people who brought you to this point are scum members. I would just fit them perfectly if you roleclaim now, so I'm asking you not to do it."



These are the hints I gave to the town, especially for the second one every lights should have turned on. Every mafia player should know what i mean.

I think I know what your pointing at and now I'm quite torn about what to do about it. I guess I'll wait for Linkz's reaction to this and decide where to go from there.



Signature goes here!

Linkzmax said:
Stefl1504 said:

Oh and I think linkz has become to hot for scum... at least a little...

What do you mean too hot for scum?


Well one off the people who unvoted you maybe scum, if they revote now, it might look bad if they do so, because he/she/it defended you in the meantime, while other scum might not jump on the lynchtrain at such a late time because it might look bad on then, that why you got too hot for some of the scum...

 

@ Zarx -

first I did not like your reaction one bit when you had placed my vote on you, I don't have played enough games with you to know how you usually react to a pressure to post vote - GoW just did that what I wanted to do him at that point - he made a contributing post - you instead complained about getting voted - further instead of doing something against my suspicion of you, you just point out that there are two other lurkers, at a point my vote wasn't placed on you just because of the lurking-factor earlier... also you are very carefull with voting linkz while you even HoSd him - If I am not wrong there were many times when you could have voted him without casting suspicion on you or lynching him and now don't say that you prefer a no lynch - because then you would have voted No Lynch some time agod(I did not forget that I forbade you voting for some hours). I already explained why Linkz is so low on my list, and again you are just thinking I am onto you because of lurking - Stop trying to distract my attention to lurkers.



Around the Network
theprof00 said:

vette and trucks and heph and stefl and wonk, can I please get your opinions on my suspects via the potals? You're all online and I'd really like to get this day over with.

DO we lynch linkz, or is there a better option? If there is a better option, would you consider notstan or ST?

As for your suspects.  I share your suspicions on Silver-Tiger and NotStan, Linkz and I would have no problem lynching any of them today. Final-Fan I'm not really getting much of a scum vibe from, despite that he seems to want my head.  And Wildvine I cant get a good read on,  he could be a first timer scum trying to lay low or he could be overwhelmed by all the situations and avoiding talking about them for fear of making a mistake and looking like scum.

I wouldnt have a problem lynching NotStan or Silver_Tiger if there was a change in votes.  Otherwise I still feel comfortable lynching Linkz



GodOfWar_3ever said:



Linkzmax said:

Bigass post where Linkz nameclaimed, hinted at being a bomb and voted vetteman.

Silver-Tiger said:

1.)No, I did not forget the conversation. What I meant is that Niko Bellic is scum and Dimitri Rascalov (or whatever his name was) is town. It's a misunderstanding and I'm sorry, I worded that terribly.

2.)Of course I know my alignment, I'm pro-town. I read my PM after all.....

As for the third-party, yes, it's possible that there is a cult or SK. I'm asking you, why not? Does it seem that unlikely that in a GTA-themed game there is a serial killer or a cult? I did not imply that you have on of these roles, I just clarified that these roles my exist in this game.

There is no way in fucking hell anyone can justify Dimitri Rascolov being pro-town. NO FUCKING WAY. He is, and always be EVIL. End of Discussion. By this I assume you mean that you have a role of a character that might be considered to be EVIL in GTA IV ? Niko might kill people, but so does almost EVERY character in GTA IV, and flavour hints at Niko being pro-town.

Need I remind of this?:

"Tip-Roles may be fitting in some cases, but they do not equal alignment. Just because someone is "Ultra evil villian of doom" in the theme, doesn't mean he's anti town in the game. Also this game is super powered."

I was a theory, and no, I don't have a role that is considered "evil" in the GTA universe. You're right that the flavour hints at Niko being pro-town, though.

FoS Silver-Tiger

And do you guys really think there'd be another anti-town killing role (other than the mafia) in a game of 13 people, and an unkillable tree stump ? Seems a bit far fetched to me.

Again, I was talking about possibilities. Learn to read.

TruckOSaurus said:
Silver-Tiger said:
TruckOSaurus said:

Something something about the last game including something about DAY TWO and ABC


dude, you know that ABC is the mod, right?

Dude, you do know I was talking about last game right?

Maybe Silver-Tiger didn't bother to read properly because he is scum :P I know that sounds really stupid, but its certainly an issue. Also, I'd like to point out that the amount of people who didn't read the post where linkz nameclaimed is disturbing.

Who didn't read that post ? Lets observe -

Hephaestos did, but he noticed it later. Silver-Tiger (again) on the other hand didn't read it, and questioned heph where he was getting that info from in the post where he noticed that linkz had roleclaimed. See below -

Silver-Tiger said:
Hephaestos said:
Hephaestos said:

wait so now you read your PM?

ZOMG he did roleclaim, he is bernie crane (not heph's real words) :P


Wait, where did you got that information from?

Silver-Tiger...If you're pro-town, read the damn posts or GTFO. If you're not pro-town (looking less likely by the minute) then please die. Maybe we can make that happen ? If linkz's lynch doesn't happen, I'd definitely want to see you lynched today. But fuck that, because you people never support my lynch targets. Ever. Maybe its because I was a bit crazy in the earlier rounds, but I've made a conscious effort to be less of that in this round. 

I'm posting these as I go on reading the thread, so I'll update my previous FoS to

HoS Silver-Tiger

Also, Silver-Tiger, I understand this post is HUGE...but try to read it :P

I do read all the posts, but you have to understand that sometimes I can miss some facts. Firstly, English isn't my first language, and secondly, do you really perceive ALL posts? We're at around 700 posts now, do you really want to tell me you have all these posts in your head? I missed the post of Linkz, because my browser automatically jumps to the newest unread posts, and somehow It slipped over the unread posts. Again, I apologize for missing that, and I really try to pay better attention now, but that is no proof that I'm scum.

Final-Fan said:

If I think Linkz is probably town, would it be wrong to lynch him on the strength of his own comments that it might be for the best? 

I know is some games, I've voted for people, who in the back of my mind, I knew were probably pro-town. And I'd always say go with your gut feeling. But I'm a sucker for lynches, and have been involved in mislynches in the past where I knew what I was doing was probably wrong. I didn't feel that way about linkz before...but I'm starting to get that feeling (probably because day one is being dragged on for waay to long). But I'd say, because him being a bomb not making sense given his character and the first quote in this post which strikes me as odd, I'd keep my vote on him, unless I can convince the rest of you that silver-tiger is scum (due to his ignorance, amongst other things mentioned in this very post). 

The magic word here is convince. As town, you would need to proove that I'm scum, but that won't be possible, since I'm not scum. But a mafia member like you doesn't need proof. You only need to convince the town to lynch one of their own, right?

But with ABC butting in every once in a while to this thread, I think there might be a possibilty that linkz wasn't lying about his 2nd PM from ABC. I don't know what to think anymore. ARGH !!!

Stefl1504 said:

I think that everyone under 25 posts should try to post a little more and 10 is just too little so GoW should post a lot more...

IF,

1. I didn't multiquote and make such bigass posts

2. Had a stable internet connection yesterday

3. Post random/impatient bullshit that adds nothing to the discussion

4. Wonder out loud

I would've had more posts. I think these "POTALS" don't mean jackshit. I've contributed more than people who come in here, make a single lined post and disappear every 2 hours or so. (Ex - zarx, wildvine, notstan)

Agree with you here. POTALS are BS. Just like scum could never have a slipup and few errors, so can a townie have many slipups and errors. The only good use is that they might show which people should be looked at.

On topic of those 3, I'd say wildvine and zarx have higher possibilities of being scum. I believe notstan is just a little noobish. But maybe its because he hasn't posted much since I started reading this thread I feel that way...hmmm..

Wonktonodi said:
Silver-Tiger said:


wouldn't it a bit obvious if I defended him the whole time?

And if I knew it would go to L1, I would have unvoted earlier. By the time I checked back in, He was already at L1.


you're vote put him at L2 what were you expecting it to do?  Also why did it take you more that 7 minutes to unvote him. Since if he was at "L1" when you saw it that would have been before hephs unvote. Yet your unvote was 7 minutes later?

This is just amazing... My thoughts on Silver-Tiger are definitely not improving in the positive direction. 

What part of my post here is giving you headaches?

Oh this is interesting. 

Time limits - zarx, notstan, and final-fan want time limits. ALL 3 of them have voted No Lynch right now. Maybe if you manned up to take a risk and vote for linkz, especially since some of you probably wanted to, you wouldn't need a time limit right now. It also makes me wonder if they voted no lynch to try and stay away from the action and slip under the radar in the event that linkz is a mislynch, and are probably anxious to get to the night.

I take back what I said about notstan. He popped up to vote for a time limit, and didn't comment on anything else. Smells like mafia eager to get to the night, to prevent his scum tell from leaking out. Actually, its true for all 3 of these players, but notstan the most, with zarx close behind.

good to know I'm not the only one who saw that.


So to sum it up, my suspicion for you just went to the roof. You accuse me for ridiculous things. I assume that know you noticed Linkz may not be lynched, you're looking for an alternative.



updated: 14.01.2012

playing right now: Xenoblade Chronicles

Hype-o-meter, from least to most hyped:  the Last Story, Twisted Metal, Mass Effect 3, Final Fantasy XIII-2, Final Fantasy Versus XIII, Playstation ViTA

bet with Mordred11 that Rage will look better on Xbox 360.

GodOfWar_3ever said:

My Scum Suspects -

1. Linkz

For obvious reasons. Yet my suspicions on him are getting less confident as the day goes on. Maybe his "you're wrong, but i don't blame you" posts are fucking with my head. I don't know :/

2. Silver-Tiger

Ignorance of posts, possibly because he is mafia. 

As he mentioned once in the thread earlier, he hints that he may have a role that may be considered to be "evil" in GTA IV. Name =/= Alignment, yes, I understand, but his behaviour on this matter is odd.

Vote, unvote on linkz in VERY quick succession, and suddenly convinced he is pro-town afterwards ?

3. and 4. Vetteman and Stefl 

Suspect them because of their change of playstyle...especially stefl.

5, 6 and 7. Notstan, Zarx and Wildvine

Lack of contributions, mostly from Zarx and Wildvine. For Notstan, his early stumbles are also a reason.

Rest of you, I have no clue of... :/

If thats the worst I can be accused of then I wont worry much,  changing of playstyle over each game can be used against someone quite well.  But going from a staunch "No Lynch" advocate on day one to wanting a Lynch a day one is not that big a deal.  



Wonktonodi said:

Didn't know bomb could only be a pro town role. So that does make it much much less likely. Even with all the abominations we have seen in these games I'm pretty sure you are right.

I explained to you that bomb is pro-town last round. It's funny to me that you think a pro-town player is very unlikely to have a pro-town role though.



Final-Fan said:

Honestly this whole day has been so bizarre.  I think I would be a lot less confused if I DID think Linkz was lying scum. 

If you're town, it might be less confusing but then you'd also be wrong. Could you be persuaded to vote NotStan?