You'd be wrong about that. Trying to get a second lynch candidate up in votes would offer a ton of information, even if it doesn't succeed and I get hammered. I think the only person I'd vote for that others are mentioning as suspicious to them is NotStan, but as I already said with my unvote: I can't push for his lynch without incurring a self-preservation vote from him and that goes against keeping myself alive.

You were volunteering information from your PM by reacting to it and calling it a slip. Heck, in the end I checked and came to the same conclusion. The problem is it induces everyone into looking and then you have people picking sides. Someone claiming homunculus last round is different as that's akin to nameclaiming. Role/Name/Abilitycliaming and paraphrasing flavor are all part of Mafia. Dissecting the presense or absense of alignment or win condition crosses the line. Had you brought up the post from the signup thread instead, I wouldn't be saying any of this.

Yes, the youma incident was worse and was likely not going to be repeated here. It's in the rules every time that quoting a PM is forbidden.

Indeed. I will still flip town, but I'm no longer saying Vette should be lynched, in fact he probably should never be lynched. If there is a Vig he should avoid shooting Vette as well.

What do you mean too hot for scum?

I'm not claiming nor denying the role(Neither in fact, though other options exist as well), but I am curious. How does one go about being a bomb and warning town, while still trying to not become avoided by a scum kill and thus always the lingering question mark and likely cause for a town loss?

Didn't know bomb could only be a pro town role. So that does make it much much less likely. Even with all the abominations we have seen in these games I'm pretty sure you are right.

As promised, here's my summary on NotStan (Silver-Tiger will be next)

NotStan is still in my scum list, in part because of his "odds talk" but also because he jumped the gun on the whole prof and stefl could be scum teammates thing. It was the start of the game, few people were online, there was a conversation going between you and stefl but NotStan reacted like someone had accused you guys of being a team.

After Linkz declared he wouldn't read his PM, NotStan FoSed Linkz for it but in the next post he says he doesn't know why someone would avoid reading his PM showing his FoS was some kind of bandwagoning, that he didn't believe in it.

Afterwards, he kinda dropped off the map, saying very little of interest.

Well you can't have it all, sure scum will avoid killing you (you could always get lucky and they'll test it out because they don't believe you or think you're something else). As for being a question mark, you could still get investigated down the line if suspicion lingers.

I'm afraid I'd have much new to bring up about Silver-Tiger. Yes his vote came at a moment where it could be considered bandwagoning but the most interesting thing I got from what I reread is that his unvote could easily read like him telling his teammate to please drop the act and say he read his PM.

Not much I know but I'm tired and that's all I've got right now.

I thought so too.