I quickly browsed ahead to see reaction... they seem to be mixed.

In my opinion, although this can be read as a confirmation of some players,  you are only correcting an erroneous statement that you made earlier. I probably would have done the same thing... but it is highly understandable that scum would be pissed at this.

I'm sending you a PM, don't comment on it in the game thread.

You mean last game, when I knew my death would certainly mean the death of two townies? Here I do not know for certain that my death will mean the death of a second townie.(Yes, I've seen TOS's post)

It was not an erroneous statement earlier. As I pointed out before this clarification, "If I did not denote your side, you are town. All non-towns I labebled in their pms." does not translate to "All town did not have their side denoted."

If both you and Vette are town you can expect at least one "I told you so" from me about the metagaming on PMs. I still doubt that you're both town though.

I think linkz needs to go.

To expand on this a bit. I am thinking it's either him or no lynch today. To get the lynch onto someone else at this point wouldn't give as much info because I could another lynch happening as a fast bandwagon from day fatigue that won't give as much info.

The game won't be the same without him since he's always one of the more frequent posters, but I don't think it would be a good idea to leave him for some future lynch. Where other things might occur and the town may have to postpone it again.

I really do think there is a possibility of him being a bomb (we'll need to question ToS though) So I'd propose someone volunteer to be the hammer vote or last vote if the day needs to be ended by a timer.

Some people I'd propose for that are ToS, for being sure he's not. Vett since he's suspicious. Notstan also suspicious and Stelf I find him suspicious and he seems keen on the idea of townies sacrificing themselves.

How do you know? Care to show your confidence by being the hammer vote?

Now there's something very different from the youma game here... I'm not picking appart PM talk, i'm not volunteering information from my PM, I'm reacting to something that was said and that by all the elements I had was wrong. Others talked about their PM and what was on it, I reacted to it. Heck last game if someone said they were homoculis, would you have said "oh it's info from their PM that they volunteered, so we shouldn't use it"?

(and you were there for the youma incident, I refused to name claim till deep in day 2 when it became ridiculous... then once I bent to the presure of 2 powered townies faking to be 'named' vanilla... the game got broken. It's not countering the initial claims that broke the game (that actually saved you from a wrongfull lynch), it was forcing to reveal actual PM information. Here all that has been done is countering the initial claim, put forward into play unrequested.)

If him saying it didn't convince you that it was best. Care to convince everyone why it isn't? Or what would be better?

it goes without saying but i'm finding #2 to be in need of a rethinking :p

Okay prof... after reading throw your postals, nothing has quite changed it just increased the rate I distrust ST a little more... I think that everyone under 25 posts should try to post a little more and 10 is just too little so GoW should post a lot more...

I'm considering Zarx, ST and NotStan scum right now if I had to rank all players in order in which to lynch... hummm I rather make a graph... the lowest level is the lowest suspicion:

/7 Zarx
/6 Silver-Tiger, Notstan
/5 -
/4 GodofWar, Prof, Final-Fan, Heph
/3 Wildvine, Vetteman, TruckoSaurus
/2 Linkzmax
/1 Stefl1504, Stumpi

though Zark could also be on the sixth level... and notstan on the fifth... so they are more like halfleveld

so if I have to tell you who I like to lynch most of of your list i would go for either SilverTiger or Notstan