Sorry, I misread you post.I think linkz is lying.  first he comes out and says that he won't read his role pm until night. then he says that he gets a second pm with some info about his role, and he still says he is going  waiting for night to read his original role pm. If he really didn't read the pm, why did he want everyone to know he didn't read it? The whole scenario just comes off as odd to me.

I think it's a little of both. His posting about not reading the pm made him seem suspicious. I was suspicious of him, then TruckOSaurus made the point that his actions would most likely benifit scum, which is why I voted for Linkz. If Linkz hadn't mentioned not reading his pm, then I think we wouldn't be suspicious of him to begin with. Basically it is the way he is playing day one that makes him looks like scum.

He could potentially trying to divert attention from other Mafia members. The idea doesn't really make sense though, it would make more sense for the mafia to try and divert attention to other players, not one of there own.

I don't think saying he read the pm would help Linkz. I he suddenly said that he read his first pm, I wouldn't belive him. That would mean he lied about reading it in the first place, giving me no reason to believe anything else he says.

Is it only me or does the analysation of zarx read quite different from the ones he made earlier, also I find it funny how he can use "he did not jump on the bandwagon when he had the chance to do it" as a pro-town-zarx point, when I did not jump on it either, and when he wrote about me, he did not even mention that fact... so if zarx does not jump on a bandwagon it is a positive aspect? so... - ST - please explain in detail why you are suspicious of me...

You are right, I analyzed Zarx really fast. And I also take it positive that you didn't vote for Linkz.

However, you're being strangely defensive, especially for a comment that wasn't directed at you. I see my vote really bothers you...

Let me make you an offer you can't refuse:

I remove my vote on you (though I can't promise I won't vote for you the next days), and you promise not to kill me night 1 if you're scum. What do you think?

Unvote

Vote: No lynch

I don't think we get much more information today, anyway.

I think that just theprof being vague,  all my PMs when I have pro-town roles says that I win when the town wins, its probably him reciting his PM and adding a little extra too it to cause a stir. I cant think of a third party that would fall into that situation, third party kinda implies that he has his own win scenario like a cult or a SK.

1. This is why

2A. Well he did it last round and never announced that he didnt so why do it this round, He announced it to make it clear to everyone that there shouldnt be ties to scum if he helps people or accuses people.

2B. He saw that he was scum, so to hide any ties he makes this claim.

2C. He makes up the second one to try and look like he is town, by saying that he got a message from ABC about roleclaiming rules.  But they have already been explained in this game,  so why would he get a specialized PM that even includes specifics about his role and thats its pro-town.  And since he knows that already why not just read the Role PM.  

2D. Not really

3.  His answers will be interesting

i can remember when I was Captain Falcon in the Smash Bros. themed game by j0, I would either win with town or if I am able to escape Brawl town - you could call that a third party...

And why should that be so unlikely?

Actually I don't think that I was defensiv there, I just pointed out how with one player you mentioned something as positiv that was ignored when talking about me.

Further I am curious if you are unvoting me, so you don't have to search now for something that would make me appear in a bad light... I am just having the feeling like you did not really had a specific reason to vote for me, you just did it without any backup - other than that feeling you are having.

I know that it often comes down to feeling when you are getting suspicious of someone, but I would appriciate if you could pinpoint the things that made you suspicious of me.

Further I would like you to analyze zarx again - not fast, but in the same maner you did analyze all the others.

Because he says that he wins when the town wins,  that kinda rules out third party as those have their own win condition.  Unless you are trying to get me to say I dont think there is a SK or a Cult in this game,  which is far from what I am saying.  Im only saying that given the information that theprof has given us I believe its safe to assume that he is not a third party role like the ones I listed.

How does him saying he didn't read it remove any possible links with scum if he did read it?

Do we think he's trying to act in a way that if he were just a plain town and looks at everyone who is suspicious as supsicious and take his word? Or do we assume he looked at it and is just trying to act in that way while he is more likely to point out suspicions of town?

I don't see why he would say he didn't read it if he did when that drew a lot of attention to him and made everyone suspicious of everything he does.

Personally I don't like the attitude of not reading the PM and I also didn't like him flat out saying he thought I had a vote related role. Although I don't think of either as overly scumy. However I have no objection to him being lynched day one since there will be quite a bit of info to go off of and a bid distraction will be gone.

However if the town doesn't lynch him today he really does need to go if the town every gets to a lylo.