So now that that is settled can we get back to lynching linkz or some decent substitute?
So now that that is settled can we get back to lynching linkz or some decent substitute?
A Bad Clown said: By the way you guys are allowed to vote for a time limit when ever, if one get's voted I'll give 24 hours |
am I allowed to vote time limits :D
Wonktonodi said:
|
Techinically speaking you've lost the ability to vote, I need to look that up
19:44:34 | Skeezer | METAL GEAR ONLINE |
19:44:36 | Skeezer | FAILURE |
19:44:51 | ABadClown | You're right! |
19:44:55 | ABadClown | Hur hur hur |
19:45:01 | Skeezer | i meant |
19:45:04 | Skeezer | YOU ARE A FAILKURE |
19:45:08 | Skeezer | FAILURE* |
Wonktonodi said: So now that that is settled can we get back to lynching linkz or some decent substitute? |
Who would be a decent substitute in your opinion? I believe I made my suspicions so far known, and since you're now officially confirmed it's time I vote for the one that I think best combines scum likelyhood with lynchability.
Unvote (In case it's even required)
Vote: NotStan
WTF? Why would a mod confirm a roleclaim? Isnt that up to the players to decide that for themselves, or to see it when they show up dead? Thats bullshit if you ask me.
Linkzmax said:
I don't know Wildvine, but the FOS followed by the Vote after Stefl defended me(oh yeah, that is what's weighing on my mind about him) doesn't seem like a logical progression. I wasn't given any time to answer the first questions, and there has been zero response since the vote, which basically just parroted TOS. |
I was suspicious of you becuase you were so eager to let everyone know that you hadn't read your role. I'm no expert on this game, but I've read through a few of the past games and I don't recall anyone doing that. TruckOsaurus' post made a lot of sesnse to me, which I why I voted. I should have waited for you to responde before voting, but even if I had waited, the responses you have given wouldn't have changed my mind.
Warrior of Light #66
"I'm not illiterate, my parents were married!"
3DS FC: 2878 9589 2016
Vetteman94 said: WTF? Why would a mod confirm a roleclaim? Isnt that up to the players to decide that for themselves, or to see it when they show up dead? Thats bullshit if you ask me. |
Tree stumps ARE supposed to be mod-confirmed, because they shouldn't ever be dead after. Some mods might not confirm the role, and then I guess it's up in the air as to whether they would let town try to lynch them and if the lynch would count when it failed.
Linkzmax said:
Who would be a decent substitute in your opinion? I believe I made my suspicions so far known, and since you're now officially confirmed it's time I vote for the one that I think best combines scum likelyhood with lynchability. Unvote (In case it's even required) |
Notstan seems lynchable to me however he also seems to be an easy set up for scum since he has his small errors here and there.
Vote Linkzmax
I believe you are lying about not reading your role PM, I believe you did read it, saw that you were scum and said that you didnt read it so there couldnt be possible links to your scum buddies through the firrst day posts. I believe you fabricated the second PM as well, since there was no reason for you to get a second PM, as you hadnt made any roleclaims of any sort.
Linkzmax said:
Tree stumps ARE supposed to be mod-confirmed, because they shouldn't ever be dead after. Some mods might not confirm the role, and then I guess it's up in the air as to whether they would let town try to lynch them and if the lynch would count when it failed. |
Says who?
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2024 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.