Why did you decide agaist voting for linkz?

Also it wouldn't have hammered unless you or someone else is a double voter.

it's so hard to read a reply like this and know how to break it down for a proper response. Since it's late, since it's day 1, since I don't feel necessary, I'll be brief.

A) I think Heph was in what could potentially be a mislynch and then he dropped out before anything could happen. Caution usually points toward scum for me.

B) I see that whole thing with Wonk now. Hopefully, it's not part of a bigger master scum plan.

C) about zarx, I can see how that looks scummy, but I didn't in any way mean that HE was town. I don't know why I wrote it like that, though. Perhaps I confused hi with stefl, who was giving me a town vibe, or perhaps I meant it in a subjective way. At this point in time I don't remember, although in the moment I'm sure there was some reason (or at least, some discernable thought process). I don't know zarx' alignment. I don't know why, but I just assumed he was town for some reason.

First off, I want to know what this warning was.

Second, do not attribute seriousness to something casual. (regarding my response to stefl)

Third, last game you didn't announce it, so, NO, you didn't do "THIS" last game. Everytime I've seen someone announce that they've turned mafia.

I want to know what your warning was, or else everyone that unvoted is going in my book. At L-1, you still didn't check your pm? ABC sent you a warning? You have nothing else to add?

I find this all highly suspicious.

Additionally, if you don't read your message, the icon always shows as a message waiting. There wouldn't be a surprise unless you always have one of your tabs set to your mailbox.

Heph, what are the odds of us winning if we vote for no lynch today?

It was at L-1 at one point I think, because it was L-2 before and someone else threw in a vote and I was online at the time.

I didn't decide to vote because there is an off chance that he is pro town, after all we didn't even have one night and people are already starting a witch hunt.

At first I thought Linkzmax's tactic was interesting and maybe worth doing.  But then I thought about it and realized that if it spread, and everyone did that, it would just end up with Day 1 being a complete fucking waste of time with everyone chasing after shadows at best.  So I'm against it, and I wouldn't have been sad if Linkz went unrepentant to the gallows.

I would say that day one's usually are a waste of time here, but this is something I had never thought of before and that isn't something I would want.

That was in reference to the last game, where he in fact posted the possible scenarios, so if the town mislynched on day one the game would have ended a day early etc, so was wondering whether a lynch was at all necessary to shorten the game and ensure that all the scum are caught. If a mislynch does bugger all difference in regards to shortening/increasing the game length, I may reconsider voting, as of right now, other than you no one really stands out in a way that can be considered suspicious, other than the obvious absence of few individuals - but not all lurkers necesarrily indicate scumminess.

But thus far, I think I am concrete with my vote, day one lynches are fruitless and are commonly based upon almost to no information - there is no knowledge of how mafia kills, if there are any serial killers, vigilantes or any other power roles that could help deduce the scum from town.

I'm just going to disagree with you on day one lynches being fruitless. I know no lynch to be a better alternative than my lynch so if I'm your only other choice I'm certainly not going to try to convince you that your opinion is wrong.

Read more posts than just the one in which you are quoted. I have no vote. So although I voted and make people think he was at L1 he remained at L2. Why do we need to wait for night to lynch someone? We know the scum are there. Day one they haven't talked with one another yet and might do something stupid.