By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General Discussion - VGC Mafia Round 29 -Grand Theft Auto 4 edition!

Awards

MVP: GodofWar_3ever- From his assumed towness and luck, he lead the mafia to victory!

Most Random: Heph- He almost got himself lynched day 2 for accusing anything that breathed, but in the end it didn't save him from the mafia. He suspected GoW, but for the wrong reasons.

Sneakiest Player: Theprof00- For asking gamebreaking questions to the mods and managing to hide himself for most of the game, he almost succeded in becoming a winner.

Most Postponed Deaths: Linkz and ST- Linkz survived hardly survived Day 1,  and the mafia never took the risk of killing the lovers pair. I'm surprised that any almost confirmed linked players lived so long.

We hardly knew ye: Zarx, NotStan, and Wildvine- They went off the map, and seemed to leave the game faster than it started.

No fighting chance: Wonk and Trucks- Wonk roleclaimed rather fast, and Trucks died too quick to make use of his role. Maybe next time Trucks will be mafia again and won't be the Night 1 kill...

Fatal Decision: Vetteman- As the last townie, he decided to end the game rather than stalling it, sealing a mafia win.

Doomed Role: Stefl-Night one's action didn't help, proving trucks was not lying, and night 2 lead to Linkz and ST dying. What seemed like a generous role turned into a curse.

The real lynch: Final-Fan- He was the only mafia lynch this whole game!

 

Someonestart another game



19:44:34 Skeezer METAL GEAR ONLINE
19:44:36 Skeezer FAILURE
19:44:51 ABadClown You're right!
19:44:55 ABadClown Hur hur hur
19:45:01 Skeezer i meant
19:45:04 Skeezer YOU ARE A FAILKURE
19:45:08 Skeezer FAILURE*
Around the Network

Round 30 Sign Up thread -

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=130425&page=1



Vetteman94 said:

If its so obvious then why was it misinterpreted by the person who recieved the information?

Its funny that you say that a simple PM from Stefl could have cleared up what the answer False ment,  but why couldnt the original PM have been more clear to not need such a thing.

It shouldn't have been, that is what I'm saying.  It was a completely and totally simple PM to understand.  I have absolutely no clue how it could have possibly been misinterpreted, but being that he clearly was having issues with something so simple, he should have done the extremely simple thing and ask for clarification (which shouldn't have been necessary in the first place).

Regardless, it is done with, I just think ABC is getting a little too much shit, when what he did really wasn't wrong.



Money can't buy happiness. Just video games, which make me happy.

Vetteman94 said:

If its so obvious then why was it misinterpreted by the person who recieved the information?

Its funny that you say that a simple PM from Stefl could have cleared up what the answer False ment,  but why couldnt the original PM have been more clear to not need such a thing.

It shouldn't have been, that is what I'm saying.  It was a completely and totally simple PM to understand.  I have absolutely no clue how it could have possibly been misinterpreted, but being that he clearly was having issues with something so simple, he should have done the extremely simple thing and ask for clarification (which shouldn't have been necessary in the first place).

Regardless, it is done with, I just think ABC is getting a little too much shit, when what he did really wasn't wrong.



Money can't buy happiness. Just video games, which make me happy.

Baalzamon said:
Vetteman94 said:

If its so obvious then why was it misinterpreted by the person who recieved the information?

Its funny that you say that a simple PM from Stefl could have cleared up what the answer False ment,  but why couldnt the original PM have been more clear to not need such a thing.

It shouldn't have been, that is what I'm saying.  It was a completely and totally simple PM to understand.  I have absolutely no clue how it could have possibly been misinterpreted, but being that he clearly was having issues with something so simple, he should have done the extremely simple thing and ask for clarification (which shouldn't have been necessary in the first place).

Regardless, it is done with, I just think ABC is getting a little too much shit, when what he did really wasn't wrong.


why would he think that he was having any difficulty with it when it was so obvious how to interpret it?  ABC even knew was going on a pointed it out in the dead thread.   He's getting some shit for a reason he chose to mod he made decisions and not everyone has to agree. Personally I don't agree with it. You are entitled to but you were in on all the info to begin with. Coming from outside that it seems ABC set it up in a way to be intentionally cryptic and allowing errors where there should have been clarity. Heck he could have just said ask it again in a true false question.



Around the Network
Baalzamon said:
Vetteman94 said:

If its so obvious then why was it misinterpreted by the person who recieved the information?

Its funny that you say that a simple PM from Stefl could have cleared up what the answer False ment,  but why couldnt the original PM have been more clear to not need such a thing.

It shouldn't have been, that is what I'm saying.  It was a completely and totally simple PM to understand.  I have absolutely no clue how it could have possibly been misinterpreted, but being that he clearly was having issues with something so simple, he should have done the extremely simple thing and ask for clarification (which shouldn't have been necessary in the first place).

Regardless, it is done with, I just think ABC is getting a little too much shit, when what he did really wasn't wrong.

Obviously it wasnt,  an without actually seeing the exact question that was asked to go with the answer nobody can say that it definitely wasnt either.  You sit there claiming there shouldnt have been anyway he misinterpreted the answer, but here we are, talking about someone who did.  

Well you could also say that ABC could have done the extremely simple thing and gave an answer that was not vague.



A Bad Clown said:

Awards

Stopped Caring Award: Vetteman- As the last townie, he decided to end the game rather than stalling it, sealing a mafia win.

Fixed



One question for ABC, why did you give Heph that extra flavor?



theprof00 said:
One question for ABC, why did you give Heph that extra flavor?


If he didn't say the flavor was actually different than what he said:

For night 1:

"You saw Stefl go out tonight to visit TruckOSaurus, he mentioned something about asking some questions and he looked like he was in a hurry."

For night 2 (where he died):

"You took a look over at Vetteman, you don't think he could have done anything villanious considering he was doing lines of coke with lesbians in a shady bar like every night."

 

 



19:44:34 Skeezer METAL GEAR ONLINE
19:44:36 Skeezer FAILURE
19:44:51 ABadClown You're right!
19:44:55 ABadClown Hur hur hur
19:45:01 Skeezer i meant
19:45:04 Skeezer YOU ARE A FAILKURE
19:45:08 Skeezer FAILURE*

to be honnest, when I reread my role, it did say i'd know "what they did", not "where they went" :p so technically the way ABC phrased my results is totally coherent with the role ^^



OoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoO