plus GOW just pushed for the idea of a double lynch. How townie is that? sounds more like scum trying to win in one night to me.

2. Its assumed that the mafia had a hider, and a roleblocker for balance. The hider and roleblocker probably wouldn't be doing the killing because they have other night actions, so heph (if not lying) can't follow either of them to a kill target. 

3. It was obvious wildvine would've been the next choice for a lynch when notstan asked to be modkilled. It was I that pointed out to the mod that wildvine had not posted for 3 days, and that he should be modkilled. If I was trying to get him to post more, I wouldn't have asked him to be modkilled, now would I ?

4. I didn't misread..I misremembered. Just a memory lapse. 

Really ? FF and Heph are suspected evenly by the players remaining.. We've been sitting ducks for nearly a week now (since my rugby trip)... Both players have a chance of being scum imo, and I'm convinced that atleast one of them is. Care to tell me how a double lynch today means that we lose the game ? 

Uh no...don't think you understand. At the start of day 2, and throughout day 1, I'd wake up to find 100 plus posts to read. Sometimes even more. I'd start reading through something interesting, which would get more or less resolved, and people come to a conclusion by the time I finish reading all posts. (Ex/The Vette PM situation on day one was discovered, and ABC posted the clarification that made people back out. All this happened before I could catch up properly.) So its a reason that concerns the game.

Heph, I'm just going to ask again;

What was the italicized sentence about? Is this your actual flavor or is it a "hint" to us?

Lie to stefl and he'll know. He asked trucks alignment and at dawn he knew.

your kidding right?

this is my answer to what stefl's role is, as per indicated by the 10 previous posts (stefl saying he didn't mind too much, FF requesting it... and iirc you too... which makes it wierd that you don't remember it).

I didn't forget. I've been asking you this question and you've been avoiding it.

Why did you write it like that? Actually, it was Linkz who asked if the italicized was your flavor paraphrased. I've also asked you what is EXACTLY was. I know it's your answer to what stefl's role is, but is that paraphrased flavor, or just you being dramatic for no reason whatsoever?

i don't have mafia wiki in my head, I figured what his role does, but not if he has other abilities and such. this is what I figured out. My statements implies directly that the only aspect of his role I know is that he was able to check trucks trough a question to which trucks replied, this also means that I know no limitations and assume that it is direct questions, hence why i've been asking for more of him all day.

so putting the "big" reveal of the begining of the day in ittalic is being overdramatic? I thought it was just being clear ^^

So now we're back to you claiming that the italicized statement referenced in the posts prof just made was given to you by ABC for no apparent reason even though it doesn't have anything to do with your role.  Correct? 

I don't buy it.  In fact, I even dreamed up a role explaining it right now that I ALSO don't buy. 

WAIT WHAT

Now you're saying that this was something you deduced, and you just allowed this clusterfuck to drag on all this time?  Or are you going to claim you didn't know we thought you had claimed it was actual information given to you by ABC? 

In some ways it kind of makes sense.  I almost remember posts of his consistent with the "deduction" interpretation. 

In other ways, it's complerely ridiculous that this should ever happen and I suspect he's scum backing out of giving us his mafia role cop result. 

I'll check back to the day's early posts. 

did you read any of my posts of the past 5 days? if this was what ABC gave me, how in the world could I have missunderstood it and thought it meant "trucks asks too many questions, shoot him". Moreover this post came a few posts after you asked me to reveal the role, so you should really have reacted then and not now. I always said I deduced the role and that the flavor helped me after I initially dismissed it.

you and prof are playing the "oh but you should have said sooner game" when i've spent 3 days explaining things already. Even if you're mafia playing dumb, it's beyond enoying, at least push for my vote and don't make me suffer a week of answering the same questions over and over again ^^.