By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General Discussion - VGC Mafia Round 29 -Grand Theft Auto 4 edition!

theprof00 said:
GodOfWar_3ever said:

Lie Detector would always get a "false" result on the Miller cop ?

Role cop would get the result "mafia" ? 

Tracker would show that he followed the target to a dead player ?

I donno. It doesn't seem not possible. I still think there is a cop though, gimped or not, in this game because there is supposedly a role blocker, and there was a mafia hider...So thats possibly 2 of 3/4 mafia with roles that could block town investigative roles, and we don't know what the other 1/2 mafia can do.

pretty sure that a hider only hides from kills, right?

http://mafiascum.net/wiki/index.php?title=Hider

It appears that you're right. I thought the Hider could hide himself from all night actions. 50% means probably every other day.

But I guess this points at a Serial Killer, and not Vigilante.  Or a 2nd mafia faction (Maybe 2 mafia each, or 2 mafia in one team and a single, powerful mafia in the other).  Because obviously, the mafia know who is pro-town or not...so they have no problems hiding behind a town role.. Further, mafiascum says its a pro-town role, so we don't know how the hell the role works on this game, with any variations ABC put on it ?

I think I've realized something important.

If the hider role is as its described above, then there has to be a 2nd mafia faction or serial killer (more likely, imo). [Or if the player targeted by the hider is vig killed..but I guess the chances of that happening would be very low...and the mafia aren't stupid enough to kill the person he hid against.]

Either way, I can't believe it, but I think you, Prof might be anti-town. I think you might be the Serial Killer. You've said, "At this time, I win with the town" meaning you could win alone if you want to (kinda like Heph in the SF round) , and I think you're trying to cause divisions among the town with crazy theories and your usual unorthodox style of play, so that you bring some suspicion on yourself so the mafia doesn't kill you tonight. Are you trying to somehow make it to the end of the game, and change your alignment and win alone ? :/

You claim to have been blocked, and there was only one kill on night one... I think you might be trying to hide behind the vigilante excuse, by hinting at it multiple times, and denying the existence of a SK in the process. And IIRC, Sk shows up innocent it cop investigations too.



Around the Network
GodOfWar_3ever said:
theprof00 said:
GodOfWar_3ever said:

Lie Detector would always get a "false" result on the Miller cop ?

Role cop would get the result "mafia" ? 

Tracker would show that he followed the target to a dead player ?

I donno. It doesn't seem not possible. I still think there is a cop though, gimped or not, in this game because there is supposedly a role blocker, and there was a mafia hider...So thats possibly 2 of 3/4 mafia with roles that could block town investigative roles, and we don't know what the other 1/2 mafia can do.

pretty sure that a hider only hides from kills, right?

http://mafiascum.net/wiki/index.php?title=Hider

It appears that you're right. I thought the Hider could hide himself from all night actions. 50% means probably every other day.

But I guess this points at a Serial Killer, and not Vigilante.  Or a 2nd mafia faction (Maybe 2 mafia each, or 2 mafia in one team and a single, powerful mafia in the other).  Because obviously, the mafia know who is pro-town or not...so they have no problems hiding behind a town role.. Further, mafiascum says its a pro-town role, so we don't know how the hell the role works on this game, with any variations ABC put on it ?

I think I've realized something important.

If the hider role is as its described above, then there has to be a 2nd mafia faction or serial killer (more likely, imo). [Or if the player targeted by the hider is vig killed..but I guess the chances of that happening would be very low...and the mafia aren't stupid enough to kill the person he hid against.]

Either way, I can't believe it, but I think you, Prof might be anti-town. I think you might be the Serial Killer. You've said, "At this time, I win with the town" meaning you could win alone if you want to (kinda like Heph in the SF round) , and I think you're trying to cause divisions among the town with crazy theories and your usual unorthodox style of play, so that you bring some suspicion on yourself so the mafia doesn't kill you tonight. Are you trying to somehow make it to the end of the game, and change your alignment and win alone ? :/

You claim to have been blocked, and there was only one kill on night one... I think you might be trying to hide behind the vigilante excuse, by hinting at it multiple times, and denying the existence of a SK in the process. And IIRC, Sk shows up innocent it cop investigations too.

Be rational, gow. I said I win with town if the game ended immediately, there is nothing about "changing my alignment". I even specifically said it wasn't like last round where Baal said the SK isn't scum (because his role was to turn FF). That has no reference to SK at all.

However, I'm glad someone finally looked at the hider role, as I assumed you all already had, and came to the conclusion that there wasn't much to know.

These are the facts.

A traditionally town role was mafia.
The role hides from night-kills.

From this, it is logical to propose that there may be other "switched" roles. ie; tracker, etc.

Aside from that, we can speculate that there is a second kill source which may in fact point to a second mafia team.

I haven't yet thought of this as a possible scenario. Immediately, this makes me look at the people questioning my RB claim since THEIR mafia faction might not have the blocker!

I wonder...could there be 2 factions of which each has one mafia lover? Or would that be imbalanced? It does bring to question the numerous relationships. Before, I was thinking the possible scum were ST/Linkz, Heph/someone, Vette/FF

Could there be 2 factions consisting of 3 mafia each? Each one having a lover? The large number of scum, 6 total, would indicate imbalance, except that if 2 were lovers (think of rival gang houses like montagues capulets), and the remaining 4 would be balanced by the fact that each has a chance of killing the other, correct? This would also indicate to me why it is becoming so hard to lynch someone. Normally, when a mafia thinks a townie is going to be lynched, they'll stay out of it.

 

But don't worry GoW. You're back on the radar now. I initialy thought that you couldn't sac your own teammate, but if there were a second faction, it would easily make sense for you to do so.

It also brings up the point of why Vette suggested that a kill was prevented.

This idea does bring up a lot of new questions, but I'm also thinking it's pretty farfetched. I think until we have more information, we shouldn't bother, because all it's doing is unconfirming people, for me at least.

 

Heph, you originally thought that the message said "too many questions, shoot him". How does the possibility of two mafia teams change your view? Perhaps it really did mean "shoot him". Don't you think?

I'd like to hear everyone's thoughts on the whole matter, but if you'd rather not discuss it, that's ok too.

 

Poor trucks having to sit through this incredibly long game

 



theprof00 said:
GodOfWar_3ever said:

http://mafiascum.net/wiki/index.php?title=Hider

It appears that you're right. I thought the Hider could hide himself from all night actions. 50% means probably every other day.

But I guess this points at a Serial Killer, and not Vigilante.  Or a 2nd mafia faction (Maybe 2 mafia each, or 2 mafia in one team and a single, powerful mafia in the other).  Because obviously, the mafia know who is pro-town or not...so they have no problems hiding behind a town role.. Further, mafiascum says its a pro-town role, so we don't know how the hell the role works on this game, with any variations ABC put on it ?

I think I've realized something important.

If the hider role is as its described above, then there has to be a 2nd mafia faction or serial killer (more likely, imo). [Or if the player targeted by the hider is vig killed..but I guess the chances of that happening would be very low...and the mafia aren't stupid enough to kill the person he hid against.]

Either way, I can't believe it, but I think you, Prof might be anti-town. I think you might be the Serial Killer. You've said, "At this time, I win with the town" meaning you could win alone if you want to (kinda like Heph in the SF round) , and I think you're trying to cause divisions among the town with crazy theories and your usual unorthodox style of play, so that you bring some suspicion on yourself so the mafia doesn't kill you tonight. Are you trying to somehow make it to the end of the game, and change your alignment and win alone ? :/

You claim to have been blocked, and there was only one kill on night one... I think you might be trying to hide behind the vigilante excuse, by hinting at it multiple times, and denying the existence of a SK in the process. And IIRC, Sk shows up innocent it cop investigations too.

1. Be rational, gow. I said I win with town if the game ended immediately, there is nothing about "changing my alignment". I even specifically said it wasn't like last round where Baal said the SK isn't scum (because his role was to turn FF). That has no reference to SK at all.

However, I'm glad someone finally looked at the hider role, as I assumed you all already had, and came to the conclusion that there wasn't much to know.

These are the facts.

A traditionally town role was mafia.
The role hides from night-kills.

From this, it is logical to propose that there may be other "switched" roles. ie; tracker, etc.

Aside from that, we can speculate that there is a second kill source which may in fact point to a second mafia team.

I haven't yet thought of this as a possible scenario. Immediately, this makes me look at the people questioning my RB claim since THEIR mafia faction might not have the blocker!

I wonder...could there be 2 factions of which each has one mafia lover? Or would that be imbalanced? It does bring to question the numerous relationships. Before, I was thinking the possible scum were ST/Linkz, Heph/someone, Vette/FF

Could there be 2 factions consisting of 3 mafia each? Each one having a lover? The large number of scum, 6 total, would indicate imbalance, except that if 2 were lovers (think of rival gang houses like montagues capulets), and the remaining 4 would be balanced by the fact that each has a chance of killing the other, correct? This would also indicate to me why it is becoming so hard to lynch someone. Normally, when a mafia thinks a townie is going to be lynched, they'll stay out of it.

 

But don't worry GoW. You're back on the radar now. I initialy thought that you couldn't sac your own teammate, but if there were a second faction, it would easily make sense for you to do so.

It also brings up the point of why Vette suggested that a kill was prevented.

This idea does bring up a lot of new questions, but I'm also thinking it's pretty farfetched. I think until we have more information, we shouldn't bother, because all it's doing is unconfirming people, for me at least.

 

Heph, you originally thought that the message said "too many questions, shoot him". How does the possibility of two mafia teams change your view? Perhaps it really did mean "shoot him". Don't you think?

I'd like to hear everyone's thoughts on the whole matter, but if you'd rather not discuss it, that's ok too.

 

Poor trucks having to sit through this incredibly long game

 

I've been making lots of assumptions and trying to get people to see farfetched possibilities, so they'd be prepared if they are true, and come to bite them in the ass. So I'm "obvtown" since I firmly believed you were pro-town, and if I have a sliver of suspicion on you (based on a twisted theory) I'm back on the radar ? Or was it that you thought I was clear because my attitude towards wildvine and I wouldn't have acted the way I did towards him if he was a scumbuddy ? And you think me and wildvine are from different scum teams ? Is that it ? Which one is it, prof ?

I think a 2nd kill source is confirmed, either 3 mafia and SK or 2 mafia teams of 2 each look the most probable imo. 6 mafia is definitely overkill.

If you want to bring the lovers into the mafia equation (that went over my head), then we might be looking at one lover in each team, and also the roleblocker and mafia hider in opposite teams ?

Imo, that would be a fucking brilliant set up by the mod (if true). It fascinates me ! The use of the lovers in opposite mafia teams (if thats indeed the case) is just pure genius.

Lovers claim, town are afraid of lynching a lover in fear of losing 2 townies. One mafia faction doesn't kill the lover in the opposite mafia faction because there are only 2 mafia. Sexyness...OMFG, I just had a nerd orgasm (not really....I'm not that weird).



GodOfWar_3ever said:
theprof00 said:
GodOfWar_3ever said:

http://mafiascum.net/wiki/index.php?title=Hider

It appears that you're right. I thought the Hider could hide himself from all night actions. 50% means probably every other day.

But I guess this points at a Serial Killer, and not Vigilante.  Or a 2nd mafia faction (Maybe 2 mafia each, or 2 mafia in one team and a single, powerful mafia in the other).  Because obviously, the mafia know who is pro-town or not...so they have no problems hiding behind a town role.. Further, mafiascum says its a pro-town role, so we don't know how the hell the role works on this game, with any variations ABC put on it ?

I think I've realized something important.

If the hider role is as its described above, then there has to be a 2nd mafia faction or serial killer (more likely, imo). [Or if the player targeted by the hider is vig killed..but I guess the chances of that happening would be very low...and the mafia aren't stupid enough to kill the person he hid against.]

Either way, I can't believe it, but I think you, Prof might be anti-town. I think you might be the Serial Killer. You've said, "At this time, I win with the town" meaning you could win alone if you want to (kinda like Heph in the SF round) , and I think you're trying to cause divisions among the town with crazy theories and your usual unorthodox style of play, so that you bring some suspicion on yourself so the mafia doesn't kill you tonight. Are you trying to somehow make it to the end of the game, and change your alignment and win alone ? :/

You claim to have been blocked, and there was only one kill on night one... I think you might be trying to hide behind the vigilante excuse, by hinting at it multiple times, and denying the existence of a SK in the process. And IIRC, Sk shows up innocent it cop investigations too.

1. Be rational, gow. I said I win with town if the game ended immediately, there is nothing about "changing my alignment". I even specifically said it wasn't like last round where Baal said the SK isn't scum (because his role was to turn FF). That has no reference to SK at all.

However, I'm glad someone finally looked at the hider role, as I assumed you all already had, and came to the conclusion that there wasn't much to know.

These are the facts.

A traditionally town role was mafia.
The role hides from night-kills.

From this, it is logical to propose that there may be other "switched" roles. ie; tracker, etc.

Aside from that, we can speculate that there is a second kill source which may in fact point to a second mafia team.

I haven't yet thought of this as a possible scenario. Immediately, this makes me look at the people questioning my RB claim since THEIR mafia faction might not have the blocker!

I wonder...could there be 2 factions of which each has one mafia lover? Or would that be imbalanced? It does bring to question the numerous relationships. Before, I was thinking the possible scum were ST/Linkz, Heph/someone, Vette/FF

Could there be 2 factions consisting of 3 mafia each? Each one having a lover? The large number of scum, 6 total, would indicate imbalance, except that if 2 were lovers (think of rival gang houses like montagues capulets), and the remaining 4 would be balanced by the fact that each has a chance of killing the other, correct? This would also indicate to me why it is becoming so hard to lynch someone. Normally, when a mafia thinks a townie is going to be lynched, they'll stay out of it.

 

But don't worry GoW. You're back on the radar now. I initialy thought that you couldn't sac your own teammate, but if there were a second faction, it would easily make sense for you to do so.

It also brings up the point of why Vette suggested that a kill was prevented.

This idea does bring up a lot of new questions, but I'm also thinking it's pretty farfetched. I think until we have more information, we shouldn't bother, because all it's doing is unconfirming people, for me at least.

 

Heph, you originally thought that the message said "too many questions, shoot him". How does the possibility of two mafia teams change your view? Perhaps it really did mean "shoot him". Don't you think?

I'd like to hear everyone's thoughts on the whole matter, but if you'd rather not discuss it, that's ok too.

 

Poor trucks having to sit through this incredibly long game

 

I've been making lots of assumptions and trying to get people to see farfetched possibilities, so they'd be prepared if they are true, and come to bite them in the ass. So I'm "obvtown" since I firmly believed you were pro-town, and if I have a sliver of suspicion on you (based on a twisted theory) I'm back on the radar ? Or was it that you thought I was clear because my attitude towards wildvine and I wouldn't have acted the way I did towards him if he was a scumbuddy ? And you think me and wildvine are from different scum teams ? Is that it ? Which one is it, prof ?

I think a 2nd kill source is confirmed, either 3 mafia and SK or 2 mafia teams of 2 each look the most probable imo. 6 mafia is definitely overkill.

If you want to bring the lovers into the mafia equation (that went over my head), then we might be looking at one lover in each team, and also the roleblocker and mafia hider in opposite teams ?

Imo, that would be a fucking brilliant set up by the mod (if true). It fascinates me ! The use of the lovers in opposite mafia teams (if thats indeed the case) is just pure genius.

Lovers claim, town are afraid of lynching a lover in fear of losing 2 townies. One mafia faction doesn't kill the lover in the opposite mafia faction because there are only 2 mafia. Sexyness...OMFG, I just had a nerd orgasm (not really....I'm not that weird).

Oops, forgot to comment on the bolded and numbered part.

1. That was how I interpreted it when I looked at it again..Obviously, you wouldn't point it out to the town if that was the case, no ?

Also, I'm gonna be looking into the thread to see who thought there was the possibility of being a SK...if there is a 2 man scum team in a 13 man game, then they'd obviously assume that there'd be a SK or another mafia faction. Especially if they were on wildvine's team.



GodOfWar_3ever said:

I've been making lots of assumptions and trying to get people to see farfetched possibilities, so they'd be prepared if they are true, and come to bite them in the ass. So I'm "obvtown" since I firmly believed you were pro-town, and if I have a sliver of suspicion on you (based on a twisted theory) I'm back on the radar ? Or was it that you thought I was clear because my attitude towards wildvine and I wouldn't have acted the way I did towards him if he was a scumbuddy ? And you think me and wildvine are from different scum teams ? Is that it ? Which one is it, prof ?

I think a 2nd kill source is confirmed, either 3 mafia and SK or 2 mafia teams of 2 each look the most probable imo. 6 mafia is definitely overkill.

If you want to bring the lovers into the mafia equation (that went over my head), then we might be looking at one lover in each team, and also the roleblocker and mafia hider in opposite teams ?

Imo, that would be a fucking brilliant set up by the mod (if true). It fascinates me ! The use of the lovers in opposite mafia teams (if thats indeed the case) is just pure genius.

Lovers claim, town are afraid of lynching a lover in fear of losing 2 townies. One mafia faction doesn't kill the lover in the opposite mafia faction because there are only 2 mafia. Sexyness...OMFG, I just had a nerd orgasm (not really....I'm not that weird).

I don't know how you could even think it was the first one. Most of my support for you came from your attitude toward wildvine. Second faction would change things. Recall that at the end of my post I said, 'we should ignore the possibility of second faction for now until we have more evidence because it is only unconfirming people, for me anyway'.

But yeah, one lover in each team makes a lot of sense to me. I figured 6 simply because I have 6 suspects. I DID ask for if it would be imbalanced. 2v2 with one lover each makes a lot of sense. Additionally, making them vengeful lovers would also make sense. It's just that 2 factions, with one mafia lover each seems a bit of a handicap to the scum. To compensate, they could be vengeful lovers in which they can kill anyone on their lynch, and have additional roles. Hider also makes a shitload of sense given that setup balance.

Basically it means that the mafia is ok as long as their lover doesn't die, but if they do, they get to pick off someone in the train, and the surviving mafia is protected from kills.

It seems imbalanced, but recall we've also had a town bomb. (Further revelation; mafia role cop makes too much sense for a town psychopath) So, despite the seemingly weak mafia, vengeful lovers can take out additional players, town bomb can be used against the town, and LD can be countered by the blocker, we also have a stump. On the plus side, we had a role that could ensure LD gets a check off (though very bad choice)...



Around the Network
GodOfWar_3ever said:

Oops, forgot to comment on the bolded and numbered part.

1. That was how I interpreted it when I looked at it again..Obviously, you wouldn't point it out to the town if that was the case, no ?

Also, I'm gonna be looking into the thread to see who thought there was the possibility of being a SK...if there is a 2 man scum team in a 13 man game, then they'd obviously assume that there'd be a SK or another mafia faction. Especially if they were on wildvine's team.

No, I would not lie about my role since that claim was preceded by "just in case there is a LD, they can check this"



 

that wouldn't matter since cops can't check SKs

Hephaestos said:

theprof00 said:
GodOfWar_3ever said:

Oops, forgot to comment on the bolded and numbered part.

1. That was how I interpreted it when I looked at it again..Obviously, you wouldn't point it out to the town if that was the case, no ?

Also, I'm gonna be looking into the thread to see who thought there was the possibility of being a SK...if there is a 2 man scum team in a 13 man game, then they'd obviously assume that there'd be a SK or another mafia faction. Especially if they were on wildvine's team.

No, I would not lie about my role since that claim was preceded by "just in case there is a LD, they can check this"

Well, you knew he wouldn't be able to check you since you're the SK.

 
   

amirite guys?



1.First mention of SK - wonk...nothing to see there

Replying to prof, who said trucks is always mafia. "no he's also often  SK, cultis and what always gets dsister; Canadian"

2. Then, notstan.

"But thus far, I think I am concrete with my vote, day one lynches are fruitless and are commonly based upon almost to no information - there is no knowledge of how mafia kills, if there are any serial killers, vigilantes or any other power roles that could help deduce the scum from town."

OK my argument isn't exactly looking too good. Both players so far have been pro-town.

3. Silver tiger on an analysis post...regarding heph

"Heph, Heph, Heph.... He was always the opposite of what I've been thinking. If I thought he was town, he was SK. If suspected him as scum, he turned up town."

He does mention SK...but not in this game.

4. Vetteman...in a controversial post.

"I think that just theprof being vague,  all my PMs when I have pro-town roles says that I win when the town wins, its probably him reciting his PM and adding a little extra too it to cause a stir. I cant think of a third party that would fall into that situation, third party kinda implies that he has his own win scenario like a cult or a SK."

This, however, isn't what I'm looking for when players mention SK. I want to see someone, being on a stance that shows that there could most probably be a SK in this game.

5. 

Silver-Tiger said:
Vetteman94 said:

I think that just theprof being vague,  all my PMs when I have pro-town roles says that I win when the town wins, its probably him reciting his PM and adding a little extra too it to cause a stir. I cant think of a third party that would fall into that situation, third party kinda implies that he has his own win scenario like a cult or a SK.


And why should that be so unlikely?

Jackpot !!!! Fits with my lovers = scum on opposite teams scenario too.

6. vetteman, in response to ST, above.

"Because he says that he wins when the town wins,  that kinda rules out third party as those have their own win condition.  Unless you are trying to get me to say I dont think there is a SK or a Cult in this game,  which is far from what I am saying.  Im only saying that given the information that theprof has given us I believe its safe to assume that he is not a third party role like the ones I listed."

7. Prof, @ ST

"And you also recently semi implied that I was a third party, commenting that SK or cult is not unlikely

 

However, I'm also suspicious of Vette for understanding that I'm a townie. But, then again I did say that I only have one vote, I win with town, and there's nothing complicated about my role at all. I'm not a townie-SK like Baal implied last round. THere is literally nothing beyond that."

8. Vigilante claims by Heph, ST, FF

Heph - ABC, does wonk count thowards victory conditions?  Scum usually wins at 50% of town, but here if we have 3 scum 3 townies including a Vig (hypothesis), town could technically still kill as often as scum... but they are already 50%, unless wonk is counted. Or did you put kill all townies as the condition? in which case, if wonk is still considered a townie, the mafia can at best draw! =D

ST (In response to Heph, above) - 

"I also thought about that. At 3vs3 1 sump mafia still wins, because even if all townies vote for one scum, they still need one additional vote. And Scum for sure aren't voting themselves, when it's 3vs3. The stump can't vote so technically the only option would be to lynch another townie, which makes winning for the town even more impossible. The inclusion of a Vig makes this interesting, though he'd need to be a day time Vigilante. A night time Vigilante wouldn't work again, since even if he kills a scum member in the night, The town would need to lynch another townie at day, since, again, scum aren't voting themselves. The result is a 2vs2 situation next day."

FF - 

"3v3 does mafia win?  
Mafia should win when victory is inevitable.  But having 50% of the population does not guarantee this if there are power roles.  For example, a bodysnatcher could cause mafia to kill one of their own, leaving the town at 3v2.  Or a vigilante could get super lucky -- 2v2, 1v1, 0v0 TIE!  "

ST is the only player to think of both Vigs and SKs so far.

9. Linkz

"Vote: Vetteman94

If I'm not being lynched today, he needs to go. If I do get lynched today, and once again I strongly urge pro-town players to condiser hammering me, then tighten the noose day two. I'd go far as telling the vig, if there is one, that they should shoot him tonight if they trust me or if I flip at twilight/evening instead of in the morning."

Again, supports the lovers = scum theory.

10. Heph in response to Linkz on Vette

"3) Agreed, the Vig should take out Vette, "Ah, I see now" is a weak enough defence on accusations to warrant that."

Exactly the kind of thing I was looking for. Seems confident on the existence of a vig. Him being on Wildvine's team doesn't look too bad now..Considering he ignored him the entire time till he was killed, as prof mentioned. But that'd deviate away from the lovers = scum theory. But, my argument isn't solely based on that. Its based on multiple kill factions, and lovers being on opposite teams was simply a possibility.
Heph mentions it again in response to Vette -
"true, hence why i'm not in a hurry to lynch you. Death by Vig/SK is fine though (better than a townie)."
Then again, after Vette responses with "So what you are saying is that a vigilante kill of a me, a townie, is better than wasting a lynch on me since no info from me will be gotten"-
"besides the fact that I think you're scum, a vigilante has a high chance of hitting a townie, so targeting a player that is likely scum, even if he ends up townie, is still more beneficial to the town than a random townie. (it saves the town the headacke of focussing on him and the potential loss of a misslynch token)."
It could also save your scumbuddy wildvine for the night atleast ? :P
11. Linkz again - "I didn't bring up last game, I brought up my second game where I was a one-shot vig."
12. ST mentions SKs again in response to prof -
"As for the third-party, yes, it's possible that there is a cult or SK. I'm asking you, why not? Does it seem that unlikely that in a GTA-themed game there is a serial killer or a cult? I did not imply that you have on of these roles, I just clarified that these roles my exist in this game."
This is the type of post I'm looking for. Saying that there is most probably an SK/Vig in the game. Just to see who may be influenced to think so based on info they have. We can narrow them down based on how much they mention these extra killing roles and "tone" of post.
13. Linkz mentions vig again...but this time he mentions of the possibility of one not existing
"So then when I flip town and if there was no vig(or he didn't listen) you'll do what should be done today anyway and get him lynched?"
14. Final Fan on vette
"Things were looking awfully bad for Vette ... but now it seems like he has a little bit of wiggle room.  I'd peg him as a good target for vig or cop though. "
Vette for vig is something linkz and heph said before...doesn't look good when you say the same thing, does it ?
15. Linkz again
"Indeed. I will still flip town, but I'm no longer saying Vette should be lynched, in fact he probably should never be lynched. If there is a Vig he should avoid shooting Vette as well."
Then he dismisses the possibility of a SK -

"And if we are both townies then it's fairly certain that there'd be a 3man mafia team and no SK."
Wildvine's mate ? He may have thought hiding was to escape from the vig....but dismisses the possibility of a SK, since hider is usually a pro-town role to avoid death by mafia, the reverse would be for scum to avoid death by vig. Maybe he overlooked the possibility of another team.
16. Stefl
"Actually I believe even if there were 3 Mafia there is still the possibility of a SK being somewhere arround, but then I think we are guarantied to have a protective role, without the SK I somehow doubt the existence of a protective rule."
Response to linkz. 
17. Heph again, in response to Vette "screwing up"

"I'm sorry I guess your definition of screwing up must be nothing short of when a Vig kills 90% of the town while the doc blocks all mafia kills? So then yeah you didn't screw up ^^"
Even a random example includes a vig...maybe its on the back of his mind.
18. Me :D
"I'm watching Dexter right now (no that doesn't make me a serial killer....just an admirer :P)"
19. Prof
"We are currently at 12....I'm thinking that there are three mafia. ABC gave up something about balance being at stake, and 3/12 is standard mafia. This would make me think that there is no SK, as the 1 is usually the SK."
20. Stefl again
"@ Prof - I think as the events turned out so far I would be uncomfortable with a no lynch since we don't know if there is a protective role and we probably will have a dual kill tonight - maybe even a tripple kill if there is an SK out there (I don't hope that there is one - even though I think we would have a protective role 100% then.)"
After this, Wildvine was revealed to be a hider...and I guess pretty much everyone considered the possibility from then.
To Summarize, 
Heph - Linkz - ST mention the SK/Vig thing the most. Interestingly, both lovers there..fitting my ridiculous(ly farfetched, yet possible) scenario. I think anyone involved with Wildvine would assume vig > sk for this game.
ST mentions SK more than Vig. So lets, give him the benefit of the doubt. Linkz also mentions the possibility of there not being a vig in his posts. Also since they're both lovers, we should be cautious.
Heph on the other hand,
1. Mentions Vig far more than SK.
Even prioritizes on Vig when mentioning both.
Ex : Death by Vig/SK suits you better @ Vette 
I this that sounds extremely ridiculous, but if you think there'd be another killing role other than mafia in this game, and thought that vig is more likely than SK, what would you type first if you're mentioning both ?
If someone asked you what your favourite fruits are, you'd obviously start with your absolute favourite right ?
2. Fits the Wildvine profile of Vig > SK. 
3. Possible connection to Wildvine also pointed out by Prof (Not mentioning him much at all till his death).
I really really hope I'm right about this, since we're using the connection of someone's role and posting patterns here. But right now, I'm inclined to believe Heph is anti-town, and possibly Wildvine's scumbuddy. Vette's lynch probably won't happen today, and things don't look good for a final-fan lynch either. I'm arguing as whether to vote Heph or not. :/ As I've said before, if we're wrong about him, we'd be losing a town power role.

Unvote
Heph, show me where you say you knew Stefl visited ToS before Stefl himself spilled the beans. Or I will probably vote for you.

 



regardless of whether you're right or wrong, that was an extremely interesting read.



theprof00 said:

regardless of whether you're right or wrong, that was an extremely interesting read.

care to comment more on that ? I'd like your input on the situation.