| Wonktonodi said: why not under the bus? was he at risk of being lynched? I'd say trying to get someone to post more by bringing attention to lurking can quilify as parenting even if its tought love. I'm not thinking absolutes I'm thingking in condradictions. You define things loosly enough now that what was a scum tell is now a sign of being town. And your crazy escape clause in point one. prop you're a big boy you can multitask. ask one person a question an answer someone else. bull headed I'm barely on here and can only post so often. If you can't answer a question in a few days why noy just admit being scum and save the town some time. your really over it? are you are you? I'd bet you'll bring it up or dig at me again before the game ends :P |
It's like you didn't even read what I wrote in the previous post. He started on wild early early on, and kept on him for days. Bringing it up all the time. He brought it up at least 5 times IIRC. That's not parenting or throwing under the bus.
But whatever dude. You don't want to listen. Fine. I've said it twice now, and I'm not going to say it again, lest you start to think that I'm "pressing the issue", which I'm sure is your next assumption. "This guy is telling me something over and over. Why? Well it's not because I can't understand. I'm always right afterall. He must be scum trying to trick me"-wonk in 5 minutes.
Again, NO, I define things loosely because they're indefinable. They are contextual. Ideas change. (totally deja vu, because I just explained this a minute ago) Things change based on the situation, the context, everything. You think in absolutes. Just because something is a tell in one game, doesn't mean the situations will be the same in another game. One game, the dsis-would you lie as a townie-game, every single mafia voted tipping point vote. Every single one, every single time. The tell works because it is based on momentum. Other times, it doesn't work because maybe mafia don't NEED to be involved in a mislynch. If a townie acts poorly enough, he can get lynched without a single mafia vote. In those cases, the tipping vote ISN'T a tell. Do you understand? Tells are not absolute from context to context.
You're thinking of "meta-rules". Meta-rules are very accurate across all contexts. The only two I know are "lynch all lurkers" and "lynch all liars".
Again, NO. You fail you fail you fail. It's nothing to do with my multitasking, and everything to do with you not thinking before you type. I don't want to answer questions that are contextually sensitive to the ones I'm asking. If I lie that vette is the roleblocker to pressure him into claiming, I don't want you fucking hassling me. You practically give him an out because people are now questioning me instead of him. The spotlight that I need to pressure him is now gone. It's not that I don't want to answer your question. It's that your question can wait, and you should be thinking before you type it, "can this question wait?". You can at least wait until Vette's answer, because then it's win/win. All you're doing asking me so early, is tanking my plan, and making me look bad. And you could've done that AFTER as well.
I'm going to take my own advice now. Every single sentence you write is literally smattered with "I'm right" that I'm finding this a lost cause and a disruption. Normally, I'd have no qualms about disrupting a 10-post-per-day non-existent discussion if I knew I were actually helping someone better their game. But that's not the case here, is it...
; - ) : - ) : - ( : - P : - D : - # ( c ) ( k ) ( y ) If anyone knows the shortcut for 
, let me know!
