First, lolz at the Wonk dig. :P

Now, there's pretty big flaw(2 actually) in your theory of scum Tracker Heph. Just to make sure I have it right, you think that if he's scum he knew(or at least had plenty of evidence to think strongly) already that Stefl was LD?

After some time thinking about it, it doesn't matter if we get the roleblocker or not. Typically, mafia cannot both use an ability and kill at the same time. Therefore, should there be only 2 mafia left, killing one of the two will force a decision to either block or kill. (there is still the possibility that he can do both to the same player. But I sincerely doubt he can visit two different players) So, specifically getting the roleblocker isn't that important. It's good to know that he's scum though.

So you knew, or at least had good reason to believe Stefl was LD at the time of your unvote? You didn't think he was the cop at all?

There is a lot of debate on this. Many believe it is unfair to penalize mafia by essentially removing their ability to roleblock should either player be lynched/killed. Some mods would allow both a kill and RB, on different targets even. I have no idea how ABC would handle it, but I for one decided the mafia RB could've done both so it isn't a given that any mafia kill will force the forfeiture of RBing.

I'm more curious as to why Heph would use an ability on stefl, when the only person to vote for him was ST.  I know he said, "suspicions from other players" and not "votes from other players" as justification, but I do find it odd in any case.

are you even trying?

Yaknow, I just don't have anything concrete on you. I made my case primarily because I see you slipping through the cracks, and want to remind everyone that you're not off the hook. I'm reminded of your SK performance in the GoW round, where you were skating around after being recruited by mafia.

However, the only thing I cannot figure out, and which may be your confirmation of town, is that you asked for the vig to kill vette, yet I was blocked, and from what I've seen thus far, I'm most widely understood to be a third party (which is what a vig is).

This piece of evidence I either don't understand, or is your salvation.

It's either that you have some plan I don't yet understand, or that someone didn't want me to kill vette. There's probably other reasons, as well.

I got interrupted before reading Page 26 (@50).  Having done so, a lot of what prof has said increases my suspicion of Heph.  And I was suspicious of him before that.  So, sorry Linkz but I once again am willing to

Vote Hephaestos.

ummmm.....okkkk.

wait, what?

If I'm lynched and flip town, then an RB exists? I can't possibly see how'd you come to the other conclusion, so that must be it. Those are pretty bad means to an end, linkz.

Vig isn't third party. That would mean that if town vig were to eliminate all mafia, then the vig would still have to eliminate townies to get down to 1on1.

yes. What's the flaw?