lmao heph, that'd be plain dirty. Exploits like that would make the game boring. I have no problems with doing it, but would it really count as a roleclaim if I acknowledge I was lying straight after ?

After some time thinking about it, it doesn't matter if we get the roleblocker or not. Typically, mafia cannot both use an ability and kill at the same time. Therefore, should there be only 2 mafia left, killing one of the two will force a decision to either block or kill. (there is still the possibility that he can do both to the same player. But I sincerely doubt he can visit two different players) So, specifically getting the roleblocker isn't that important. It's good to know that he's scum though.

why would you acknowledge that you were lying?

anyway, I'm pretty sure it's against the rules. Last game it was disallowed by Hatmoza. Odd coincidence, I was the one who suggested the idea of claiming a role in order to prove that you're not the role, and I was mafia defending myself against claims that I was the poisoner.

1) If I recall, I quoted one of the 10 zillion votals you had baal do for that and well it was wrong :p.

2) Both wonk and Gow rub me the wrong way, cause they always try to lynch me :p, really no other reason (besides the stats), I've yet to have a real read on GoW.

3) Well anyone voting for you solely on the 4th voter point while linkz was in the line of fire would have gotten my attention... lookie who joined the discution on that ^^

4) yep, I wasn't "surprised", but moreover, I was weary of where you were trying to get with that and since I was one of the few present for that wonk action, I acted to distance myself from any scheme you might have had.

5) I Initiated Linkz and Vette votes day one.... what else? Oh you mean today where we have a shortlist? yeah i'm shooting rather blind here ^^

I'll also point out that I wasn't on Zarks's lynch... the one I would say was initiated by Stefl's insistance on him (yes you're not the one that voted him first or whatever the discution was earlier Day 2). In fact I noted that Zarx tried to name claim in his first posts, something that reminded me of his DBZ game and gave me a town feeling on him, hence why I didn't participate at all in that "easy" lynch.

When the game started I asked him if I could claim SK day one to prove I wasn't it :p (he said no to that too).

actually a better rule would be: Mafia doesn't get randomed their ability for roleclaiming. They have no interest in doing so in the first place, only townies do.

Let me clarify, you recently said that you targeted him because you thought he was scum. Here you say you had no evidence. Yet, you had plenty of other suspects day one, including Vette. Why go after stefl when you had no evidence, completely ignoring the people that you had been very vocal about during day 1?

haha, can't answer that clearly without roleclaiming :p

I'll just say suspicion draws attention, my other 2 targets were suspected by others too.

of course.

you do realize that the only other person to vote for stefl on day 1 was silver tiger, correct?