NO! I DON'T. THEY CLEARLY STATED THAT THEY'D PICK ON YOU IF YOU COMPLAIN.

wow, man! chill! seriously what have they done to you? did you complain or what?

who wouldn't that baby is some fine pootang!! jks lol what have secuirty come to these days what im gonna hide a bomb in my babys nappies

Nobody here pointed out yet, that, the stroller was the item that set off the alarm. Why did the baby get frisked? Couldn't they just inspect the stroller? Are trained personnels not expected to use their heads?

I find if funny that some people don't find this a big deal. The odds that were going to hide some kind of explosive in that little kids pants,was going to be very low and would'nt have been obvious if they did? I guess people like getting treated like criminals. I'm all for security,but there's a fine line between security and invading someone's privacy. 

And some of us don't mind strangers touching their babies, it seems.

I still want to work for TSA so I can rub Miss America vagina without going to jail, though.

As I said in an earlier thread, this is what you get when you base security policy on political correctness ...

There are dozens of ways to classify people based on security risk (including age, gender, race, religion, travel habits, personal life, etc.) and if you focused your security efforts on high risk individuals rather than on low risk individuals you would likely have better, less invasive and less expensive security.

I'm all for the strict security in airports.  If you don't like that we need strict security (Yes, we need it, because fucktards think they have to terrorize stuff), then drive where you want to go, or don't go (either if you can't drive across the ocean, or if you simply don't want to drive).

Damn those high-explosive babies!